Publishing House “Akademperiodyka”

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Books Scientific monographs Ukrainian scientific book in a foreign language

Comprehensive radioecological monitoring for objects of radioactively contaminated areas

Authors:
Boris Prister,
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1440-1481
Tatiana Lev,
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7558-2816
Anatolii Nosovskyi,
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2594-3780
Mykola Talerko,
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7278-5420

 

Reviewers:
Oleg VOITSEHOVYICH, Ph. D. (Geogr.), Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the NAS
of Ukraine and State Service of Emergencies of Ukraine
Oleksandr TARARIKO, Academician of the NAAS of Ukraine, Prof., Dr. Sci. (Agr.),
Institute of Agroecology and Nature Management of the NAAS of Ukraine
Igor SHARAEVSKIY, Senior Researcher, Dr. Sci. (Tech.),
Institute for Safety Problems of Nuclear Power Plants of the NAS of Ukraine

 

Year: 2022
Pages: 286
ISBN: 978-966-360-465-7
Publication Language: English
Publisher: PH “Akademperiodyka”
Place Published: Kyiv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/akademperiodyka.465.286

The principles of forming an optimal network of radioecological monitoring of contaminated territories for acute and remote periods after a radiation accident are outlined, which takes into account the ecological features of the territory. A comprehensive system for assessing the degree of radioecological criticality of the territory, forecasting the radiation situation, monitoring the agrosphere and radiation quality control of products on different spatial scales has been developed.

 

PDF

REFERENCES:

Chapter 1

 

  1. Kuznetsov V.M., Nazarov A.G. Radiation legacy of the Cold War. The experience of historical and scientific research. Moscow, Ed. House “Klyuch-S”, 2006. 719 p. [in Russian].
  1. Arutyunyan R.V., Voronov S.I., Kamyshansky M.I. et al. Ensuring radiation safety of the population and territories. Part 1. Fundamentals of organization and provision of radiation safety of the population and territories. Moscow, IBRAE RAN, 2012. 401 p. [in Russian].
  2. Gubarev V.S. Passion for Chornobyl. Moscow, Algorithm, 2011. 308 p. [in Russian].
  3. Prister B.S. Problems of agricultural radiobiology and radioecology under environmental pollution with a young mixture of nuclear fission products. Chornobyl, Institute for Safety Problems of NPP of NAS of Ukraine, 2008. 320 p. [in Russian].
  1. Bebeshko V.G., Prister B.S., Omelyanets M.I. et al. Radiophysical and medical-hygienic consequences of the Chornobyl catastrophe: ways of cognition and overcoming. A practical guide for the family doctor. TDV Patent, Uzhhorod, 2017. 504 p. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Prister B.S., Shestopalov V.M., Kukhar V.P. On the unlearned lessons of Chornobyl: to look back, to realize, not to repeat. Bulletin of the state of the exclusion zone and the zone of unconditional (compulsory) resettlement. 2011. No. 1 (37). P. 3—28 [in Russian].
  2. Prister B.S., Klyuchnikov A.A., Shestopalov V.M., Kukhar V.P. Nuclear power safety problems. Lessons from Chornobyl. Chornobyl, Institute for Safety Problems of NPP of NAS of Ukraine, 2013. 200 p. [in Russian].
  1. Teverovsky E.N. Contamination of the area with long-lived radioactive isotopes. Proceedings of Institute of Applied Geophysics. 1968. Issue 01. P. 3. [in Russian].
  1. Burnazyan A.I. (Ed.) Results of the study and experience of liquidation of the consequences of accident polution of the territory by the products of uranium fission. Moscow, Energoatomizdat, 1990. [in Russian].
  1. Izrael Y.U. (Ed.). Atlas of Radioactive Contamination of European Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. Moscow, 1998. 143 p.
  2. Takahashi S. (Ed.). Radiation Monitoring and Dose Estimation of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Tokyo, Springer, 2012.
  3. Voitsekhovych O., Giriy V.A. Current state and prospects of development of the national network of radiation monitoring of the environment. Papers of the Central Geophysical Observatory. 2021. Issue 17 (31). P. 70—82. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Bakurov A.S., Romanov G.N., Shein G.P. Dynamics of the radiation situation on the territory of the East Ural radioactive trace. Issues of radiation safety. 1997. No. 4. P. 68—74. [in Russian].
  2. Bakurov A.S. Experience in the rehabilitation of contaminated areas. Regional scientific and practical conference EURT-45. Works and materials, Ozersk, 2002. [in Russian].
  3. Study of radioecological, radiation-hygienic and socio-economic consequences of massive radioactive contamination of large areas (1958—1984). Vol. IV. Agricultural use of the contaminated area: Report on the topic “Mirage”. PO “Mayak”; research managers E. N. Teverovsky, I. A. Ternovsky (Foundations of PA Mayak). Ozersk, Library of “Issues of Radiation Safety”, No. 4. Ozersk, Editorial and Publishing House center VRB, 2005. 132 p. [in Russian].
  4. Nikipelov B.V., Drozhko E.G., Romanov G.N. et al. Kyshtym accident close-up. Nature. No. 5. P. 47— 75. [in Russian].
  5. Conclusion of the expert commission on the environmental situation in the area of activity of PA “Mayak”. Moscow, 1990. 345 p. [in Russian].
  6. Aleksakhin R.M., Buldakov L.A., Gubanov V.A. et al. Major radiation accidents: consequences and protective measures. Moscow, IzdAT, 2004. 752 p. [in Russian].
  7. Prister B.S., Aleksakhin R.M. Problems of radiation safety of the population — lessons of the Kyshtym and Chornobyl accidents. XXXVI radioecological readings of V.M. Klechkovsky. Moscow, 2008. P. 47—75. [in Russian].
  1. Belyaev S.T., Borovoy A.A. On radioactive emissions of the 4th unit of the Chornobyl NPP. International Congress “Nuclear Accidents and the Future of Energy”. Paris, April 15—17, 1991. 11 p. [in Russian].
  2. IAEA Information Circular. International conference “A decade after Chernobyl: an assessment of the consequences of the accident”, 1996, INFCIRC/510. 26 p. [in Russian].
  3. Borzilov V.A., Klepikova N.V. Effect of meteorological conditions and release composition on radionuclide deposition after the Chernobyl accident. The Chernobyl Papers (Eds. S.E. Merwin, M.I. Balonov). Washington, Research Enterprises, Richland, 1993. P. 47—68.
  1. 10 years after the accident at the Chornobyl nuclear power plant. National report of Ukraine. Kyiv, Attika, 2006. 224 p. [in Russian].
  2. Prister B.S. Consequences of the accident at the Chornobyl nuclear power plant for agriculture in Ukraine. Issledovaniya CPER. No. 20. Kyiv, 1999. 104 p. [in Russian].
  1. Aleksakhin R.M., Sanzharova N.I., Fesenko S.V., Kurganov A.A., Mosharov V.N. The main results of work to eliminate the consequences of the accident at the Chornobyl nuclear power plant in the field of agro-industrial production. Moscow, 2001. P. 105—141. [in Russian].
  2. Environmental Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident and Their Remediation: Twenty Years of Experience. Report of the UN Chernobyl Forum Expert Group “Environment” (EGE). Vienna, 2005. 180 p.
  3. Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters, Government of Japan, “Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety — The Accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations”. Vienna, IAEA, June 2011.
  1. MEXT-NRA. Research Sites in Kawamata. Tokyo, 2014.
  2. Steinhauser. G., Brandl A., Johnson T.E. Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: A review of the environmental impacts. Science of the Total Environment. 2014. Vol. 470—471. P. 800—817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.029
  1. Miller Ch., Cubbage A., Dorman D., Grobe J., Holahan G., San-Filippo N. Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, July 12, 2011, http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1118/ML111861807.pdf.
  1. Kimura K. Accident response taken by MEXT (Environment Radiation Monitoring). Emergency Operation Center (EOC). Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). Tokyo, 2012.8 p.
  2. Designating and Rearranging the Areas of Evacuation. Cabinet Office, Japan. Support Team for Residents Affected by Nuclear Incidents. July 26, 2012.14 p.
  3. International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources, Safety Series No. 115, IAEA, Vienna, 1997.
  4. Brown D.G., Cell R., Dahlman R.C. Fallout radiation field. Survival of Food Crops and Livestock in the Event of Nuclear War. Conf. Springfield, 1971. P. 639—642.
  1. Balonov M. The Chernobyl accident as a source of new radiological knowledge: implications for Fukushima rehabilitation and research programs. J. Radiol. Prot. 2013. Vol. 33. P. 27—40. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/33/1/27
  1. Bogdevich I., Sanzharova N., Prister B., Tarasiuk S. Countermeasures on natural and agricultural areas after Chernobyl accident. Role of GIS in lifting the Cloud of Chernobyl. Academic Publishers. 2001. P. 147—158.
  1. Annenkov B.N., Egorov A.V., Ilyazov R.G. Radiation Accidents and Elimination of Their Consequences in the Atmosphere. Kazan, Publishing house of FES of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, 2004. 408 p. [in Russian].
  2. Renaud P.H., Beaugelin K., Maubert H., Ledenvic P.H. Les retombeesen France de accident de Tchernobyl, consequences radioecologiques et dosimetriques. IPSN Collection. EDP Sciences. 1999.
  3. Prister B.S., Ivanov Yu.O., Perepelyatnikova L.V. et al. Agricultural aspects of liquidation of consequences of the Chornobyl accident. Chornobilska catastrophe (Ed. V.G. Baryakhtar). Kyiv, Nauk. dumka, 1996. P. 362—371. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Fukushima Monitoring Database (FMD) created in IAEA. JAEA’s R&D activities for collecting, managing, and providing environmental monitoring data. Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 2015.
  1. Garger E.K. Resuspension of radioactive aerosol in the surface layer of the atmosphere. NAS of Ukraine, Institute of NPP Safety Problems. Chornobyl, Institute for Safety Problems of NPP of NAS of Ukraine, 2008. 192 p. [in Russian].
  1. Salbu B., Krekling T., Lind D.H. et al. High energy X-ray microscopy for characterization of fuel particles. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research. 2001. Vol. A467—468. P. 1249—1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00641-6
  1. Kashparov V.A., Ahamdach N., Zvarich S.I., Yoschenko V.I., Maloshtan I.M., Dewiere L. Kinetics of dissolution of Chernobyl fuel particles in soil in natural conditions. J. Environ. Radioact. 2004. Vol. 72. P. 335—353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2003.08.002
  2. Shevchuk V.E. (ed.) 15 years after the Chornobyl disaster: consequences in the republic and their overcoming. National report. Minsk, Committee on the problems of the consequences of the disaster at the Chornobyl nuclear power plant, 2001. 118 p. [in Russian].
  3. Shevchuk V.E. (ed.). The aftermath of Chornobyl in Belarus: 17 years later. National report. Minsk, Propilei, 2003. 54 p. [in Russian].
  4. Bogdevich I.M. et al. Recommendations for the conduct of agro-industrial production in the conditions of radioactive contamination of the lands of the Republic. RUE “Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus”. Minsk, 2003. 72 p. [in Russian].
  5. Bogdevich I.M. et al. Fundamentals of agriculture. Ecological, biomedical and socio-economical consequences of the Chornobyl disaster in Belarus. Institute of Radiobiology of the Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, 1996. Ch. 2. P. 52—102. [in Russian].
  1. Prister B.S., Perepelyatnikov G.P., Ilyin M.I. Actual problems of fodder production in conditions of radioactive contamination of the territory. Dokl. NAS of Ukraine. 1993. No. 1. P. 153—163. [in Russian].
  1. Israel Yu.A., Sokolovsky V.G., Sokolov V.E. et al. Environmental consequences of radioactive contamination of natural environments in the area of the Chornobyl nuclear power plant accident. Atomic Energy. 1988. Vol. 64, No. 1. P. 28—40. [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01124005
  2. Likhtarov I.A. (ed.) General dosimetric certification of settlements of Ukraine that were exposed to radioactive contamination after the Chornobyl accident. Collection 6. Kyiv, Ministry of Health of Ukraine, 1997. 103 p. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Samoilov O.B., Usynin G.B., Bakhmetyev A.M. Safety of nuclear power plants. Moscow, Energoatomizdat, 1989. 280 p. [in Russian].
  1. Battist L., Peterson H. T. Radiological consequences of the Three Mile Island accident (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (USA). Office of Standards Development). International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, 5. Jerusalem, Israel, March 9—14, 1980.
  1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation (UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly, with Annexes); Annex D, Health Effects due to Radiation from the Chernobyl Accident. New York, United Nations, 2011.
  2. Nosovskiy A.V., Vasilchenko V.N., Klyuchnikov A.A., Prister B.S. The accident at the Chornobyl nuclear power plant: Overcoming experience. Lessons learned. Kyiv, Tekhnika, 2006. 264 p. [in Russian].
  3. Ilyin L.A., Pavlovsky O.A. Radiological consequences of the accident at the Chornobyl nuclear power plant and measures taken to mitigate them. Atomic Energy. 1988. Vol. 65, Issue. 2. P. 119—129. [in Russian].
  1. Shilov V.P. Consequences of the 1957 accident for agriculture in the area of pollution. Regional scientific and practical conference EURT-45. Works and materials, Ozersk, 2002. P. 38—55. [in Russian].
  1. Kozlova E. Evgeny Ilyich Mikerin. The road chosen by the word “must” … Moscow, Izdat, 2012. 232 p. [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036029512030159
  1. Fedorov E.A., Prister B.S., Romanov G.N., Arkhipov N.P., Burov N.I., Aleksakhin R.M., Tikhomirov F.A., Dibobes I.K., Povalyaev A.P. Recommendations for the conduct of agriculture and forestry in case of radioactive contamination of the environment. Moscow, 1973. 101 p. [in Russian].
  2. Prister B.S., Burov N.I., Buldakov L.A. et al. Recommendations for early prediction of radiation injury, sorting and preservation of cattle when a mixture of young nuclear fission products enters the body of animals. Radioecology of vertebrates animals. Moscow, Nauka, 1978. P. 138—148. [in Russian].
  3. Fifteen years of the Chornobyl disaster. Overcoming experience. Materials of the international conference. (Kyiv, Ukraine, April 18—20, 2001). Kyiv, Chernobylinform, 2001. [in Russian].
  4. Prister B.S., Aleksakhin R.M., Bebeshko V.G., Likhtarev I.A., Ivanov V.K., Kruk Yu. The Chornobyl disaster: the effectiveness of measures to protect the population, the experience of international cooperation. Kyiv, Energetika i elektrifikatsiya, 2007. 100 p. [in Russian].
  1. Romanov G.N. Elimination of the consequences of radiation accidents. Moscow, IzdAT, [in Russian].
  2. Romanov G.N. Radiation accident at PA Mayak: practice of countermeasures, their effectiveness and lessons learned. Issues of radiation safety. 1997. No. 3. P. 3—11. [in Russian].
  3. Korsakov Yu.D., Fedorov E.A., Romanov G.N., Panteleev L.I. Assessment of the radiation situation in the territory contaminated as a result of wind transport of radioactive aerosols in the area of the enterprise in 1967. Issues of radiation safety. 1994. No. 4. P. 50—59. [in Russian].
  1. Izrael Yu.A., Stukin E.D. Gamma — radiation from radioactive fallout. Moscow, Atomizdat, [in Russian].
  2. Kukhtevich V.I., Goryachev I.V., Trykov L.A. Protection from the penetrating radiation of a nuclear explosion. Moscow, Atomizdat, 1970. [in Russian].
  3. Zolotukhin V.G., Kimel L.R., Ksenofontov A.I., Leipunsky O.I., Panchenko A.M. Field of study of a point monodirectional source of monodirectional source of gamma quanta. Moscow, Atomizdat, 1974. [in Russian].

Chapter 2

  1. Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 7. IAEA. Vienna, 2015. 136 p.
  2. Environmental and Source Monitoring for Purposes of Radiation Protection: IAEA Safety Standards. Safety Guide. No. RS-G-1.8. IAEA. Vienna, 2005. 136 p.
  3. Programmers and Systems for Source and Environmental Radiation Monitoring, Safety Reports Series No. 64. IAEA. Vienna, 2010. 248 p.
  4. Generic Procedures for Monitoring in a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. IAEA-TECDOC-1092. IAEA. Vienna, 1999. 287 p.
  5. Generic Assessment Procedures for Determining Protective Actions during a Reactor Accident. IAEA-TECDOC-955. IAEA. Vienna, 1997. 260 p.
  6. Method for the Development of Emergency Response Preparedness for Nuclear or Radiological Accidents. IAEA-TECDOC-953. IAEA. Vienna, 1997. 126 p.
  7. Sampling of Radionuclides in the Environment, ICRU Report 75, International Commission on Radiation Units & Measurements. 2006.
  8. Soil Sampling for Environmental Contaminants. IAEA-TECDOC-1415. IAEA. Vienna, 2004. 84 p.
  9. Temporary acceptable levels (TAL-91) of radionuclides of cesium-137 and strontium-90 in food and drinking water, established in connection with the Chernobyl accident: “Handbook for radiological services of the Ministry of Agriculture of Ukraine”. Kyiv, 1997. P. 145. [in Ukrainian].
  10. General safety of nuclear power plants. НП 306.2.141-2008. State Committee for Regulation of Ukraine. Order No. 162 of 19.11.2007. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Requirements for determining the size and boundaries of the observation zone of a nuclear power plant. Approved by the Order of the State Inspectorate for Nuclear Regulation of Ukraine, Ministry of Health of Ukraine. Order No. 153/766 of 11.07.2011. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Regulations on the state environmental monitoring system. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 391 of 30.03.1998. [in Ukrainian].
  2. List of current regulations PR-D.0.06.555-16 of the operating organization State Enterprise “NEGC Energoatom”. Order of 03.07.2016. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Radiation control regulations for power units with WWER reactors. Sectoral normative document of the Ministry of Fuel and Energy GDN 95.1.01.03.657-2004, 2004. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Regulations for radiation control of Rivne NPP NEGC Energoatom No. 1-R-RB. 2005. [in Ukrainian].
  2. Requirements for internal and external NPP crisis centers. State Committee for Nuclear Regulation of Ukraine No. 2 dated January 16, 2004. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Regulations on the state environmental monitoring system. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of 30.03.1998 No. 391. [in Ukrainian].
  2. Regulations for the exchange of environmental information prior to the agreement on cooperation in the field of environmental monitoring of the Ministry of Environmental Protection of Ukraine and the Ministry of Health of Ukraine (2008b). 18.06.2008. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Regulations for the exchange of environmental information to the agreement on cooperation in the field of environmental monitoring of the Ministry of Environmental Protection of Ukraine and the State Agency of Land Resources of Ukraine. 22.05.2009. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Regulations on soil monitoring on agricultural lands. Ministry of Agriculture of Ukraine No. 51 dated February 26, 2004. [in Ukrainian].
  2. Standard plan for response to accidents and emergencies at Ukrainian nuclear power plants. NEGC “Energoatom”, 2004. [in Russian].
  3. Typical regulations on the functional subsystem of the unified state system of prevention and response to emergencies of man-made and natural disasters. Order No. 387 Ministry of Emergencies of 21.12.98. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Recommendations for dosimetric control in the areas of nuclear power plants: Sanitary rules and regulations on radiation safety in nuclear energy. Moscow, Ministry of Health of the USSR, 1989. Vol. 3. P. 323—341. [in Russian].
  2. Romanenko A.N. The organization of control and forecasting of a radiation situation at emergency situations on OP “RAES”: Problems of operative reaction at local and regional accidents at objects of atomic power. Kyiv, ISP NPP NASU, 2007. [in Russian].
  3. State of radiation safety and radiation protection at the Zaporozhe nuclear power plant in 2005: Annual report OP “Zaporozhe NPP”. Energodar, 2006. 109 p. [in Russian].
  4. Annual report on the assessment of the radiation impact of the Rivne NPP on the environment in 2004 OP “Rivne NPP”. Kuznetsovsk, 2005. 92 p. [in Russian].
  5. Report on radiation safety of Khmelnitsky NPP for 2004 OP “Khmelnitsky NPP”. Netishin, 2005. 58 p. [in Russian].
  6. Report on radiation safety in South Ukraine for 2004 No. ОЧ.0.0026.125. OP “South-Ukrainian NPP”. Yuzhnoukrainsk, 2005. 47 p. [in Russian].
  7. Annals of the ICRP: The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 103. Elsevier, Vol. 37 No. 2—4. 2007. 339 p.
  8. Palitskaya T.A. Ecological monitoring at Russian nuclear power plants: seminar “Environmental monitoring in Russia on the eve of the Kiev conference 2003”. Moscow. Seminar materials. 2002. URL: http://archive.energoatom.kiev.ua/ru/press/nnegc/32715-sistema_ekologicheskogo_monitoringa_na_atomnyh_stantciyah_rossii/ (Last accessed 06.09.2021) [in Russian].
  1. Aleksakhin R.M., Fesenko S.V., Vdovin E.K., et al. Fundamentals of environmental policy of the Ministry of Atomic Energy of Russia. 2002. [in Russian].
  2. Radioecological Monitoring: Safety and Quality Directorate. 2007. Kozloduy NPP. URL: http://www.kznpp.org. (Last accessed 06.09.2021) [in Bulgarian].
  1. Aarkrog A. On the direct contamination of rye, barley, wheat and oats with 85Sr, 137Cs, 54Mn and 141Ce. Radiat. Bоt. 1969. Vol. 9 (5). P. 357—366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-7560(69)80062-1
  1. Osmachkin V.S. Analysis of existing radiation monitoring systems. 2008. URL: http://www.eco.nw.ru (Last accessed 16.09.2015) [in Russian].
  2. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SF-1: Fundamental Safety Principles. IAEA. Vienna, 2006. 37 p.
  3. The concept of protection of the population and territories in case of threat and emergence of emergency situations. Decree of the President of Ukraine of March 26, 1999. [in Ukrainian].
  4. General safety of nuclear power plants. НП 306.2.141-2008/State Committee for Regulation of Ukraine. Order No. 162 of 19.11.2007. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Radiation safety standards of Ukraine: NRBU-97/State hygienic standards. Kyiv, Department of Printing of the Ukrainian Center for State Sanitary Supervision of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, 1997. 121 p. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3. IAEA. Vienna, 2014. 471 p.
  2. Arrangements for Preparedness for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GS-G-2.1. IAEA. Vienna, 2007. 145 p.
  3. Method for Developing Arrangements for Response to a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. Updating IAEA-TECDOC-953. IAEA, Vienna, 2003. 273 p.
  4. The concept of agricultural production in contaminated areas and their comprehensive rehabilitation for the period 2000—2010 (Ed. Prister B.S.). Kyiv, Svit, 2000. 48 p. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Criteria for Use in Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. IAEA Safety Standards Series No GSG-2. IAEA. Vienna, 2011. 91 p.
  1. Allowable levels of 137Cs and 90Sr of radionuclides in food and drinking water: Resolution Chief State doctor of Ukraine from 03.05.2006. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Temporary allowable levels of radioactive substances in food, drinking water, medicinal herbs (total beta activity)/Decree of Ch. State sanitary doctor USSR on 30.05.1986. Book “Collection of normative and methodical documents regulating agriculture in the territories exposed to radioactive contamination as a result of the Chernobyl accident”. Vol. 1. Obninsk, 2006. P. 11—13. [in Russian].
  2. Temporary allowable levels (TAL-91) of radionuclides of cesium-137 and strontium-90 in food and drinking water, set in connection with the Chernobyl accident: In the “Handbook for radiological services of the Ministry of Agriculture of Ukraine”. Kyiv, 1997. P. 145. [in Ukrainian].

Chapter 3

  1. About the legal regime of the territory that was exposed to radioactive contamination as a result of the Chernobyl disaster: Law of Ukraine of 27.02.1991 No. 79IA-XII, VVR, 1991, No. 16, article 198. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Aleksakhin R.M., Buldakov L.A., Gubanov V.A. et al. Major radiation accidents: consequences and protective measures. Moscow, IzdAT, 2004. 752 p. [in Russian].
  1. Prister B.S., Aleksakhin R.M., Bebeshko V.G., Likhtarev I.A., Ivanov V.K., Kruk Yu. The Chornobyl disaster: the effectiveness of measures to protect the population, the experience of international cooperation. Kyiv, Energetika i elektrifikatsiya, 2007. 100 p. [in Russian].
  1. Study of radioecological, radiation-hygienic and socio-economic consequences of massive radioactive contamination of large areas (1958—1984). Vol. IV. Agricultural use of the contaminated area: Report on the topic “Mirage”/PO “Mayak”. Scientific advisers Teverovsky E.N., Ternovsky I. A. (Funds PO “Mayak”). Ozersk, 1984/Bibliographic journal: “Radiation Safety Issues”. Ozersk, VRB Editorial and Publishing Center, 2005. No. 4. 132 p. [in Russian].
  2. Ivanov Yu.A. Radioecological substantiation of long-term forecasting of radiation situation on agricultural lands in case of large nuclear accidents (on an example of accident at the Chernobyl NPP).: Dissertation for the degree of Doctor Biol. Science. Obninsk, 1997. [in Russian].
  3. Prister B.S. Problems of agricultural radiobiology and radioecology under environmental pollution with a young mixture of nuclear fission products. Chornobyl, Institute for Safety Problems of NPP of NAS of Ukraine, 2008. 320 p. [in Russian].
  1. Environmental Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident and Their Remediation: Twenty Years of Experience. Report of the UN Chernobyl Forum Expert Group “Environment” (EGE). Vienna, 2005. 180 p.
  2. Programs and Systems for Source and Environmental Radiation Monitoring. Safety Reports Series No. 64. IAEA, Vienna, 2010. 234 p.
  3. Prister B.S. Agricultural aspects of the Chernobyl disaster: Problems of agricultural radiology. Collection of scientific works. Kyiv, 1996. No. 4. P. 3—9. [in Russian].
  4. Prister B.S. Problems of predicting the behavior of radionuclides in the soil-plant system. Adaptation of the agroecosphere to the conditions of technogenesis (Ed. R.G. Ilyazov). Kazan, FEN, 2006. P. 85—127. [in Russian].
  1. Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. General Safety Requirements. No. GSR Part 7. IAEA, Vienna, 2015. 136 p.
  1. Radiation safety standards of Ukraine (NRBU-97). Kyiv, Printing Department of the Ukrainian Center for State Sanitary and Epidemiological Surveillance of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, 1997. 125 p. [in Ukrainian].
  2. Prister B.S., Loshchilov N.A., Nemets O.F., Poyarkov V.A. Fundamentals of Agricultural Radiology. Kyiv, Urozhay, 1991. 472 p. [in Russian].
  1. Prister B.S., Kashparov V.O., Lazarev M.M., Perepelyatnikova L.V. et al. Agriculture in the conditions of radioactive contamination of the territory of Ukraine as a result of the Chernobyl accident for the period 1999—2002: Methodical recommendations. Kyiv, 1998. 104 p. [in Russian].
  2. Prister B.S. Consequences of the accident at the Chornobyl nuclear power plant for agriculture in Ukraine. Issledovaniya CPER. No. 20. Kyiv, 1999. 104 p. [in Russian].
  3. Israel Yu.A., Sokolovsky V.G., Sokolov V.E. et al. Ecological consequences of radioactive contamination of natural environments in the area of the Chernobyl accident. Atomic Energy, 1988. Vol.64. No. 1. P. 28—40. [in Russian].
  1. Prister B.S. Guide to the organization of control of the state of the natural environment in the area of the NPP location. In: Methodical recommendations for conducting comprehensive (radioecological, chemical) monitoring of soils and landscapes around of NPP (Ed. K.P. Mahonko). Leningrad, Hydrometeoizdat, 1990. P. 239—249. [in Russian].
  2. Prister B.S., Truskavetsky R.S., Grabovsky M.P., Emilyanova J.L., Pronevich V.A. et
  3. Agroecological monitoring system of peat lands: Methodical recommendations. Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry named O.N. Sokolovsky. Kharkiv, 1995. 34 p. [in Russian].
  4. Glazovskaya M.A. General soil science and soil geography. Moscow, Higher school, 1981. 400 p. [in Russian].
  5. Glazovskaya M.A. Geochemical bases of typology and methods of research of natural landscapes. Smolensk, Oikumena, 2002. 145 p. [in Russian].
  1. Polynov B.B. The doctrine of landscapes. On the geological role of organisms. Questions of geography. 1953, No. 33. P. 33—64. [in Russian].
  2. Glazovskaya M.A. On geochemical principles of classification of natural landscapes. In: Geochemistry of steppes and deserts. Moscow, Geografgiz, 1962, P. 6—52. [in Russian].
  3. Glazovskaya M.A. Geochemistry of natural and man-made landscapes of the USSR. Мoscow, Higher school, 1988. 328 p. [in Russian].
  4. Shaposhnikov E.S., Minaeva T.Yu. Complex landscape-typological method of protected area allocation. Criteria and methods of formation of ecological network of natural territories. No. 1, 2nd edition. Moscow, Center for Wildlife Conservation SOES, 1999. P. 32—37. [in Russian].
  5. Polynov B.B. Selected works. Moscow, Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1956. 752 p. [in Russian].
  6. Perelman A.I., Kasimov N.S. Landscape geochemistry. Astrea-2000, 1999. 730 p. [in Russian].
  7. Isachenko A.G. Landscape science and physical-geographical zoning. Moscow, Higher school, 1991. 366 p. [in Russian].
  8. Perelman A.I. Landscape geochemistry. Moscow, Geografgiz, 1961. 391 p. [in Russian].
  9. Kogotkov A.Ya. Behavior of radioisotopes in soils of the middle Trans-Urals.: Dissertation of Dr. Biol. Science. ONIS Fund of the enterprise/postbox no. A-7564, inv. No. OH, 1968. 773 p. [in Russian].
  1. Klechkovsky V.M., Fedorov E.A., Arkhipov N.P. et al. Regularities of soil and aeral intake of radioactive strontium in agricultural plants. Soil Science, 1973. No. 5. P. 38—47. [in Russian].
  2. Fedorov E.A., Filatova E.V. Study of biogeochemical patterns of behavior of strontium-90 and cesium-137 in the soil and vegetation cover of natural landscapes: Report. ONIS Fund of the enterprise, postbox no. A-7564, inv. No. OH-1376. 1980. [in Russian].
  1. Prister B.S., Kluchnikov A.A., Baryakhtar V.G., Shestopalov V.M., Kukhar V.P. Nuclear Power Security Issues. Chornobyl lessons. 2nd edition, supplemented. Chornobyl, 2016. 356 p. [in Russian].
  1. Prister B.S., Vinogradskaya V.D., Lev T.D., Talerko N.N., Garger E.K., Onishi Y, Tischenko O.G. Preventive radioecological assessment of territory for optimization of monitoring and countermeasures after radiation accidents. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2018. Vol. 184—185. P. 140—151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.01.021
  1. Yamaguchi M., Kitamura A., Oda Y., Onishi Y. Predicting the long-term 137Cs distribution in Fukushima after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident: a parameter sensitivity analysis. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2014. Vol. 135. P. 135—146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.04.011
  1. Shilov V.P. Radiation and ecological characteristics of 137Cs and 90Sr depositions in the territory of radionuclide fallout in the spring of 1967 (part 1). Problems of radiation safety. 2003. No..1. P. 35—42. [in Russian].
  1. Dobrovolsky V.V. Geochemical geography. Moscow. 2008. 207 p. [in Russian].
  2. B. Prister, Perepelyatnikov G., Alexakhin R., Arkhipov N., Pronevych V. The behavior of radionuciides in natural and semi-natural environments. Luxembourg, Office for Official Pubtications of the European Communities, 1996. 147 p.
  3. Prister B.S., Ivanov Y.O., Perepelyatnikova L.V., Kudryk M.N., Mozhar A.O., Skorobogatko V.P. Agricultural aspects of liquidation of consequences of the Chernobyl accident: Book “Chernobyl disaster” (Ed. V.G. Baryahtar). Kyiv, Naukova dumka, 1996. P. 362—371. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Perepelyatnikova L.V., Prister B.S., Omelyanenko N.P., Gritsyuk N.R. Influence of landscape-geochemical features of the Chernobyl evacuation zone on the horizontal migration of radionuclides: Proceeding of III Congress of Radiation Research. Pushchino (Russia), Iz-vo RAN, 1997. 465p. [in Russian].
  1. Ramensky L.G. Introduction to complex soil-geobotanical research of lands. Moscow, Selkhozgiz, 1938. 620 p. [in Russian].
  2. Prister B.S., Garger E.K., Talerko N.N., Vinogradskaya V.D., Lev T.D. Model of zoning of the territory at different levels of possible radioactive contamination of the agrosphere. Agriculture. 2015. No. 2. P. 79—86. [in Russian].
  1. Lev T.D., Prister B.S., Vinogradskaya V.D. Preventive integrated assessment of radioecological criticality of agricultural areas for the purposes of effective management of radiation disaster response processes. Safety problems of nuclear power plants and Chernobyl, 2016. No. 26. P. 113—121. [in Russian].
  2. Prister B.S., Vinogradskaya V.D., Lev T.D., Talerko N.N., Garger E.K., Tishchenko O.G. Landscape and radioecological zoning of the territory for the purposes of monitoring the agrosphere in the event of an accident at a nuclear power plant. PEMME, Vol. XXIX, No. 2, 2018. P. 51—79. [in Russian].
  3. Lev T.D., Prister B.S., Vinogradskaya V.D., Tishchenko O.G., Piskun V.N. Basin-landscape principle in assessing the degree of radioecological criticality of the territory of Ukraine. Ukr. Geogr. Journal. 2018, No.4 (104). P. 49—58. [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2018.04.049
  1. Prister B.S., Aleksakhin R.M. Problems of ensuring radiation safety of the population — lessons from the Kyshtym and Chornobyl accidents. Experience of overcoming the consequences of technogenic accidents and the development of nuclear technologies. Materials of scientific-practical. conf., dedicated to the 50th anniversary of the accident at PA Mayak. Chelyabinsk, 2007. P. 68—93. [in Russian].
  2. Aarkrog A. Environmental Studies on Radioecological Sensitivity and Variability with Special Emphasis on the Fallout Nuclides 90Sr and 137Cs. Riso National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark. June 1979. Riso-R-437. Part one. 269 p.
  3. Howard B.J. The concept of radioecological sensitivity. Rad. Prot. Dos. 2000. No. 92 (1—3). P. 29—34. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033279
  1. Howard B.J. et al. Radioecological Sensitivity Final Report, September 1998—March 2001. Center for Ecology and Hydrology, Natural Environment Research Council, March 2002. 68 p.
  2. Howard B.J., Wright S.M., Barnett C.L. Spatial Analysis of Vulnerable Ecosystems in Europe: Spatial and Dynamic Prediction of Radiocaesium Fluxes into European Foods (SAVE): Final Report. CEH. March 2002. 68 p.
  3. Working Group 8 Environmental Sensitivities Progress Report: 3rd EMRAS II Technical Meeting, Closing Plenary. Presented by: Bliss Tracy, Health Canada. Vienna. January 28, 2011. 19 p.
  1. Prister B.S., Vinogradskaya V.D. Radioecological consequences. Dynamics of radioactive contamination of terrestrial ecosystems and the effectiveness of protective measures: National Report of Ukraine “Twenty-Five Years of the Chornobyl Accident. Security of the future”. Kyiv. KIM, 2011. P. 39—98. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Fortescue J. Geochemistry of the environment. Publisher: Progress. 1985. 360 p.
  2. Pronevich V.A., Voznyuk S.T., Veremeenko S.I. Accumulation and migration of 137Сs in soils and plants of natural pastures in the conditions of Volyn Polissya of Ukraine: Visnyk of NUVGP. Rivne, 2006. No. 2 (34). P. 21—28. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Egorova T.M. Ecological and geochemical principles of assessment of agrolandscapes of Ukraine: dissertation. Kyiv, Institute of Agroecology and Nature Management of NAAS, 2018. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Prister B.S. Radioecological consequences. Dynamics of radioactive contamination of terrestrial ecosystems and the effectiveness of protective measures. In: National Report of Ukraine “Twenty-Five Years of the Chernobyl Accident. Security of the future”. Kyiv, Pub. KIM, 2011. P. 39—98. [in Ukrainian].
  2. Prister B.S. et al. Experimental substantiation in parametrization of the model describing 137Cs and 90Sr behavior in a soil-plant system. Environment Science and Pollution Research. 2003. Special issue 1. P. 126—136.
  1. Medvedev V.V., Laktionova T.N. Soil-technological zoning of arable lands of Ukraine. Kharkiv, 2007. 396 p. [in Russian].
  1. Fedorov E.A. et al. Biological action of young products of division into dairy cattle and their transition into livestock products. (Eds. B.N. Annenkov, I.K Dibobes, R.M Alexahin). Radiobiology and radioecology of farm animals. Moscow, Atomizdat, 1973. P. 70—140. [in Russian].
  2. Prister B.S., Lev T.D., Vinogradskaya V.D, Tishchenko O.G., Piskun V.M. Preventive radioecological assessment of the territory for agricultural production in case of radiation accidents. Agroecology. 2016. No. 1. P. 14—20. [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.33730/2077-4893.1.2016.248018
  1. Strand P., Howard B.J., Averin V., Skuterud L., Pronevych V. Interim report summarising progress of ECP-9. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities. 1995. 175 p.
  1. Gillett A.G., Crout N.M., Absalom J.P., Wright S.M., Young S.D., Howard B.J., Barnett C.L., McGrath S.P., Beresford N.A., Voigt G. Temporal and spatial prediction of radiocaesium transfer to food products. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2001. Vol. 40 (3). P. 227—235.
  1. Instructional and methodical instructions “Reconstruction and forecast of radiation doses of the population living in the territories of Ukraine exposed to radioactive contamination as a result of the Chernobyl accident”. Methodology-97. Kyiv, 1998. 76 p. [in Ukrainian].
  2. General dosimetric certification of settlements of Ukraine that were exposed to radioactive contamination after the Chornobyl accident. Kyiv, Ministry of Health of Ukraine, 1997. No. 6. 103 p. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Perepelyatnikova L.V., Shevchenko A.L., Prister B.S., Omelyanenko N.P., Charny D.V., Shmatok V.I., Gritsyuk N.R. Redistribution of radionuclides on landscape landfills after the Chernobyl accident. Problems of agricultural radiology: Scientific papers of Ukrainian Scientific Institute of Agricultural Radiology. Kyiv, UkrINTEI, 1996. No. 4. P. 78—89. [in Ukrainian].
  2. Jacik A.V. Water management in Ukraine. Кyiv, Genesa, 2000. 456 p. [in Russian].
  3. Zub L.M., Karpova G.O. Small rivers of Ukraine: characteristics, current state, ways of preservation. URL: http://www.uarivers.net/ (Last accessed 12.02.2021).
  4. Water Code of Ukraine. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VVR). 1995, No. 24. p. 189. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Prister B.S., Burrough P.A., Gillespie M.K., Howard B.J., Howard, D.C., Pronevych V. Redistribution of Chernobyl 137Cs in Ukraine wetlands by flooding. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Centre, 1996. 43 р.
  6. Kuzin P.S., Babkin V.I. Geographical regularities of the hydrological regime of rivers. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 1979. 200 p. [in Russian].
  7. Prister B.S., Barjakhtar V.G., Perepelyatnikova L.V., Vynogradskaja V.D., Rudenko V.A., Grytschuk N.R. and Ivanova T.N. Experimental substantiation in parametrization of the model describing 137Cs and 90Sr behavior in a soil-plant system. Environment Science and Pollution Research, 2003. No.1. P. 126—136.
  8. Prister B.S., Vinogradskaya V.D., Perepelyatnikova L.V. Substantiation and parametrization of the 13⁷Cs behavior model in the “soil-plant” system. Problems of safety of nuclear power plants and Chernobyl. 2006. No. 5. P. 170—178. [in Russian].
  1. Aleksakhin R.M. Problems of Radioecology: Evolution of Ideas. Results. Moscow, Russian Agricultural Academy: GNU VNIISKHRAE, 2006. 880 p. [in Russian].
  2. Klimenko V.G. Hydrology of Ukraine: A manual for students-geographer. Kharkiv, Pub. KhNU named. V. Karazin, 2010. 124 p. [in Russian].
  3. Chebotarov A. І. Hydrological vocabulary. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 1978. 308 p. [in Russian].
  4. Lev T.D., Vinogradskaya V.D., Piskun V.N., Tishchenko O.G. Creation and organization of interaction of a complex spatial databases for solving problems of numerical modeling and assessment of the radiation situation in emergency response systems. Problems for the safety of nuclear power plants and Chernobyl, No. 26. P. 103—112. [in Russian].
  1. T. D. Lev, Tishchenko O.G., Piskun V.N. Features of the creation of cartographic material for solving the problems of assessing and forecasting the radioecological situation. Nuclear energy and the environment, 2020. No.1 (16). P. 68—84. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Lev T.D., Prister B.S., Vinogradskaya V.D., Tishchenko OG, Piskun V.N. Assessment of the radioecological criticality of the territory of the hydrographic regions of Ukraine. Geoinformatika, 2017. No. 2 (62). P. 44—54. [in Russian].
  2. Hare K. Safety of Ontario’s Nuclear Power Reactors: A Scientific and Technical Review. Toronto, Ontario, 1988. Vol. 1. 405 p.
  1. World Imagery Digital Globe ArcGIS. URL: http://server.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/services/World_Imagery/MapServer https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels?tab=overview   (Last accessed 25.04.2020).
  2. Landsat satellite imagery data. URL: http://goto.arcgisonline.com/map/World_Imagery(Last accessed 12.02.2021)
  1. National Atlas of Ukraine, electronic version. URL: http:// www.isgeo.com.ua (Last accessed 25.04.2020).
  1. Archives tribute to the relief of the Earth’s surface. US Project Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM). URL: http://gisweb.ciat.cgiar.org/TRMM/SRTM_Resampled_250m  (Last accessed 19.06.2021)
  1. Interactive topographic map of Ukraine 1: 100,000. URL: http://maps.vlasenko.net (Last accessed 25.04.2020).
  2. Public cadastral map of Ukraine. URL: http://map.land.gov.ua/kadastrova-karta (Last accessed 25.04.2020).
  3. Berlyant A.M. Geoinformation mapping. Moscow, 1997. 64 p. [in Russian].
  4. Lev T.D. Estimation of the roughness parameter of the territory of Ukraine at different spatial scales for models of atmospheric transport and deposition of pollutants. Problems of nuclear power plants’ safety and of Chornobyl, 2018. No 31. P. 16—30. [in Russian].
  1. Simonov Yu.G., Simonova T.Yu. River basin and basin organization of the geographic envelope: Proceedings “Soil erosion and channel processes. No 14”. Moscow, 2004. P. 7—32.
  1. Nemykin A.Ya. Landscape-basin approach in the territorial land management of the Voronezh region.: Dissertation abstract. Voronezh, 2005. 24 p. [in Russian].
  2. Davydchuk V.S., Zarudnaya R.F., Mikheli S.V., et al. Landscapes of the Chernobyl zone and their assessment under the conditions of radionuclide migration. Kyiv, Naukova Dumka, 1994. 111 p. [in Russian].
  3. Fisburn P.C. Utility theory for decision making. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1972.
  4. Prister B.S., Bizold G., Deville-Kavelin J. Method of complex assessment of soil properties for predicting the accumulation of radionuclides by plants. Radiation biology. Radioecology. 2003. Vol. 43. No. 6. P. 39—42. [in Russian].
  1. Prister B.S., Vinogradskaya V.D. Kinetic model of 137Cs behavior in the soil-plant system, taking into account the agrochemical properties of the soil. Problems of nuclear power plants’ safety and of Chornobyl. 2011. Issue 16. P. 151—161. [in Russian].
  1. Gulyakin I.V., Yudintseva E.V., Panov V.Z. The entry of strontium, cesium and iodine into plants through leaves and roots. Bulletin of the Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 1967. No. 6. P. 85—90. [in Russian].
  2. Yudintseva E.V., Gulyakin I.V., Demin V.A. Accumulation of strontium-90 and cesium-137 in vegetable crops. Agrochemistry. 1968, No. 8. P. 101—110. [in Russian].

Chapter 4 

  1. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3, IAEA, Vienna. 2014.
  2. Тalerko N.N., Garger Е.К., Klyuchnikov A.A. Prediction of the consequences of accidental releases from nuclear power plants with the help of the mesoscale atmospheric transport model LEDI. Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 2010. No.12. P. 74—79. [in Russian].
  1. ARW Version 3 Modeling System User’s Guide. National Center for Atmospheric Research, July 2012. 214 pp.
  2. Veltischev N.F., Zhupanov V.D. Numerical weather forecasts from non-hydrostatic public WRF-ARW and WRF-NMM models. Gidrometeocenter of Russia. Book_Gidromet. indb. 2010. P. 94—135. [in Russian].
  3. Rivin G.S. Modern systems of mesoscale weather forecast: state and prospects. Gidrometeocenter of Russia. Book_Gidromet.indb. 2010. P. 82—93. [in Russian].
  4. ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1979 to present. URL: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-single-levels?tab=overview (Last accessed 25.04.2020).
  5. ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels from 1979 to present. URL: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels?tab=overview (Last accessed 25.04.2020).
  6. Talerko N. Mesoscale modelling of radioactive contamination formation in Ukraine caused by the Chernobyl accident. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2005. Vol. 78. P. 311—329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.04.008
  7. Talerko N. Reconstruction of 131I radioactive contamination in Ukraine caused by the Chernobyl accident using atmospheric transport modelling. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2005. Vol. 84. P. 343—362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2005.04.005
  8. Makhon’ko K.P. (Ed.) Guide on organization of environmental monitoring in the area of a nuclear power plant location. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 1990. [in Russian].
  9. Byzova N.L., Garger E.K., Ivanov V.N. Experimental investigations of atmospheric diffusion and pollution dispersion. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 1991. [in Russian].
  10. Orlenko L.R. The structure of atmospheric planetary boundary layer. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 1979. [in Russian].
  11. Yordanov D. About surface layer height. Izvestiya AN SSSR, ser. FAO. 1977. Vol. 13. No. 7. [in Russian].
  12. Nieuwstadt F.T.M., Van Dop H. (Eds.) Atmospheric turbulence and air pollution modelling. Reidel. Dordrecht, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9112-1
  13. Nieuwstadt F.T.M. The steady-state height and resistance laws of the nocturnal boundary layer: Theory compared with Cabauw observations. Bound.-Layer Meteor. 1981. Vol. 20. P. 3—17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119920
  14. Deardorff J.W. Three dimensional numerical study of the height and mean structure of a heated planetary boundary layer. Bound.-Layer Meteor. 1974. No. 7. P. 81—106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224974
  15. Nicholson K.W. The dry deposition of small particles: a review of experimental measurements. Atmospheric Environment. 1988. Vol. 22. P. 2653—2666. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(88)90434-9
  16. Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling Liaison Committee Annual Report. Appendix A: Review of Deposition Velocity and Washout Coefficient. NRPB-R322. 2001.
  17. Aleksakhin R.M., Buldakov L.A., Gubanov V.A. et al. Major radiation accidents: consequences and protective measures. Moscow, IzdAT, 2004. 752 p. [in Russian].
  18. Shilov V.P. Consequences of the 1957 accident for agriculture in the area of pollution. Regional scientific and practical conference EURT-45. Works and materials, Ozersk, 2002. P. 38—55. [in Russian].
  19. Radioecological assessments of the consequences of the accident at the Chornobyl Nuclear power plant for the territory 30-kilometer zone and the Ukrainian SSR: Research report; research manager G.N. Romanov. Fund ESRS PA “Mayak”, 1987. [in Russian].
  20. Prister B. Behavior of the Chernobyl-Derived Radionuclides in Agricultural Ecosystems. In: Behavior of Radionuclides in the Environment II. Chernobyl. Eds. A. Konoplev, K. Kato, S. Kalmykov. Singapore, Springer, 2020. P. 229—282. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3568-0_5
  21. Burnazyan A.I. (Ed.) Results of the study and experience of liquidation of the consequences of accident polution of the territory by the products of uranium fission. Moscow, Energoatomizdat, 1990. [in Russian].
  1. Wakeford R. A double diamond anniversary — Kyshtym and Windscale: the nuclear accidents of 1957. J. Radiol. Prot. 2017. Vol. 37. E7—E13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aa7e87
  2. Fedorov E.A., Prister B.S., Romanov G.N., Arkhipov N.P., Burov N.I., Aleksakhin R.M., Tikhomirov F.A., Dibobes I.K., Povalyaev A.P. Recommendations for the conduct of agriculture and forestry in case of radioactive contamination of the environment. Moscow, 1973. 101 p. [in Russian].
  3. Prister B.S. Problems of agricultural radiobiology and radioecology under environmental pollution with a young mixture of nuclear fission products. Chornobyl, Institute for Safety Problems of NPP of NAS of Ukraine, 2008. 320 p. [in Russian].
  1. Muller H., Prohl G. ECOSYS-87: A Dynamic Model for Assessing Radiological Consequences of Nuclear Accidents. Health Physics. 1993. Vol. 64 (3). P. 232—252. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199303000-00002
  2. Hungate F.F. et al. Decontamination of plants exposed to a simulated reactor burn. USAEC Report. HW-63173, 1960.
  3. Nakanishi T.M., Tanoi K. Agricultural Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Springer, 2013. 209 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00008-0_9
  1. Romanov G.N., Ukhanova V.A. Some quantitative characteristics of direct contamination of the terrestrial part of plants by global radioactive fallout. Moscow, Atomizdat, 1969. [in Russian].
  1. Russell R.S. Deposition of 90Sr and its content in vegetation and human diet in the United Kingdom. Nature. 1958. Vol. 182, No. 4. P. 639. https://doi.org/10.1038/182834a0
  2. Aarkrog A. On the direct contamination of rye, barley, wheat and oats with 85Sr, 137Cs, 54Mn and 141Ce. Radiat. Bоt. 1969. Vol. 9 (5). P. 357—366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-7560(69)80062-1
  3. The hazards to man of nuclear and allied radiations. A Second Report to Medical Research Council. London, HMSO, 1960. 155 p.
  4. Martin W.E. Losses of 90Sr, 89Sr and 131I from fallout contaminated plants. Radiat. Bot.
  5. Vol. 4 (3). P. 275—284.
  6. Middleton L.I., Squire H.M. Comparison of the retention of various nuclides by cabbage. Agricultural Research Council Radiological Laboratory Report. 5, 1961. 50 p.
  1. Tkachenko N.V. Peculiarities of radioactive contamination of vegetation and its role in theformation of the radiation situation in the first years after the accident at the Chornobyl NPP. Kyiv, Biol. Sciences, 1990. 161 p. [in Russian].
  2. Fukushima Monitoring Database (FMD) created in IAEA. JAEA’s R&D activities for collecting, managing, and providing environmental monitoring data. Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 2015.
  3. Unweltradiaktivitat und Strahlenexposition in Sudbayern durch dem Tschernobyl (1986) — Unfall.-Munchen-Neuherberg. GSF-Bericht. Vol. 16 (86). P. 37.
  4. Environmental Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident and Their Remediation: Twenty Years of Experience. Report of the UN Chernobyl Forum Expert Group “Environment” (EGE). Vienna, 2005. 180 p.
  5. Renaud P.H., Beaugelin K., Maubert H., Ledenvic P.H. Les retombeesen France de accident de Tchernobyl, consequences radioecologiques et dosimetriques. IPSN Collection. EDP Sciences. 1999.
  1. Fedorov E.A., Prister B.S., Romanov G.N., Burov N.I., Ryabova E.R., Ukhanova V.A., Ryabov G.G. Biological action and behavior of radioactive fission product — in agricultural chains. In the collection “Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy”. Vienna, IAEA, 1971. Vol. 11. P. 663—674.
  1. Barkhudarov R.M., Gordeev K.I., Dibobes I.L., Likhtarev I.A., Margulis U.Ya., Osanov D.P., Pavlovsky O.A., Prister B.S., Savkin M.N., Shamov V.P. Methodological principles for calculating the levels of external and internal exposure of the population, used in making operational decisions. Materials of the scientific conference “Medical aspects of the accident at the Chornobyl nuclear power plant”. May 11—12. Kyiv, Health, 1988. P. 111—118. [in Russian].
  2. Prister B., Talerko M., Garger E., Vinogradskaya V., Lev T. Methodology for longterm radiation monitoring for dose assessments using radiological zoning and modeling of radionuclides migration in environmental and food chains. Countermeasures of Cesium Uptake by Farm Crops and Livestock: Proceeding of the Final ISTC/STCU Technical Review Committee Meeting of Fukushima Initiative “On the Environmental Assessment for Long Term Monitoring and Remediation in and around Fukushima”. Tokyo, Japan, November 5—6, 2015. JAEA-Conf 2016 — 002. P. 55—87.
  1. Prister B.S. Consequences of the accident at the Chornobyl nuclear power plant for agriculture in Ukraine. Issledovaniya CPER. No. 20. Kyiv, 1999. 104 p. [in Russian].
  2. Three Mile Island. A Report to the Commissioners and to the Public / UREG/CR-1250. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Special Inquiry group. Vol. II. Part 2. 1980. P. 308—805.
  3. Wakeford R. The Windscale reactor accident — 50 years on. J. Radiol. Prot. 2007. Vol. 27, No. 3. P. 211—215. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/27/3/E02
  4. Biosfere. Modelling and Assessment BIOMASS programme. IAEA, Vienna. 2002. 126 р.
  5. Prister B.S., Loshchilov N.A., Nemets O.F., Poyarkov V.A. Fundamentals of Agricultural Radiology. Kyiv, Urozhay, 1991. 472 p. [in Russian].
  1. Prister B.S., Bizold G., Deville-Kavelin J. Method of complex assessment of soil properties for predicting the accumulation of radionuclides by plants. Radiation biology. Radioecology. 2003. Vol. 43. No. 6. P. 39—42. [in Russian].
  1. Prister B.S. Problems of predicting the behavior of radionuclides in the soilplant system. Adaptation of the agroecosphere to the conditions of technogenesis (Ed. R.G. Ilyazov). Kazan, FEN, 2006. P. 85—127. [in Russian].
  2. Klechkovsky V.M., Tselischeva G.N. On the Behavior of Radioactive Fission Products in Soils, Their Intake into Plants and Their Accumulation in the Harvest. Moscow, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1956. P. 3—74. [in Russian].
  3. Klechkovsky V.M., Sokolova L.N., Tselischeva G.N. Sorption of trace amounts of strontium and cesium by soils. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy. Moscow, Atomizdat, 1958. 470 p. [in Russian].
  4. Klechkovsky V.M. (ed.) On the behavior of radioactive fission products in soils, their entry into plants and their accumulation in the harvest. Moscow, AN SSSR, 2006. 177 p. [in Russian].
  5. Cremers A., Elsen A., De Preter P., Maes A. Quantitative analysis of radiocaesium retention in soils. Nature. 1988. No. 6187. Р. 247—249. https://doi.org/10.1038/335247a0
  6. De Preter P. Radiocaesium retention in aquatic, terrestrial and urban environment: a quantities and unifying analysis. Ph.D. Thesis. K.V. Leuven. Belgium, 1990. 93 p.
  7. Konoplev A.V., Konopleva I.V. Parameterization of 137Cs transfer from soil to plants based on key soil characteristics. Radiation biology. Radioecology. 1999. Vol. 39, No. 4. P. 455—461. [in Russian].
  8. Prister B., Howard B., Vinogradskaya V. Regularities of Chernobyl 137Cs and 90Sr behaviour in soil-plant system. International congress on the radioecology of continental and estuarine environments. Aix-en-Provence, France, 3—7 September 2001. P2T11 (575).
  9. Prister B.S. A quantitative comprehensive assessment of soil properties in predicting the behavior of radionuclides in the soil-plant system. Bulletin of Agrarian Science. 2002. No. 1. P. 61—68.
  10. Prister B.S., Barjakhtar V.G., Perepelyatnikova L.V., Vynogradskaja V.D., Rudenko V.A., Grytschuk N.R. and Ivanova T.N. Experimental substantiation in parametrization of the model describing 137Cs and 90Sr behavior in a soil-plant system. Environment Science and Pollution Research, 2003. No.1. P. 126—136.
  11. Prister B.S., Vinogradskaya V.D. Kinetic model of 137Cs behavior in the soil-plant system, taking into account the agrochemical properties of the soil. Problems of nuclear power plants’ safety and of Chornobyl. 2011. Issue 16. P. 151—161. [in Russian].
  1. Prister B.S., Vinogradskaya V.D. A model for predicting the dose of internal exposure of the population at the soil path of the inclusion of long-lived radionuclides in the food chain. Problems of nuclear power plants’ safety and of Chornobyl. 2009. Issue 11. P. 128—135.
  2. Lev T.D., Tishchenko O.G., Piskun V.N. Information, analytical and cartographic support of NPP emergency response systems. Problems of nuclear power plants’ safety and of Chornobyl. 2011. Issue 16. P. 17—26.
  3. Lev T.D., Piskun V.N., Vinogradskaya V.D., Tishchenko O.G. Creation and organization of interaction of a complex of spatial databases for solving problems of numerical modeling and assessment of the radiation situation in emergency response systems. Problems of nuclear power plants’ safety and of Chornobyl. 2016. Issue 26. P. 103—112.
  4. State hygiene standards “Norms of radiation safety of Ukraine (НРБУ-97)”, approved by the Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of Ukraine of December 01, 1997 No 62. 121 p.
  5. World Imagery Digital Globe ArcGIS. URL: http://server.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/services/World_Imagery/MapServer https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels?tab=overview  (Last accessed 25.04.2020).
  6. Lev T.D., Tishchenko O.G., Piskun V.N. Features of the creation of cartographic material for solving the problems of assessing and forecasting the radioecological situation. Nuclear Power and the Environment. 2020. No. 1 (16). P. 68—84. [in Ukrainian].
  7. National Atlas of Ukraine, electronic version. URL: http:// www.isgeo.com.ua (Last accessed 25.04.2020).
  8. Interactive topographic map of Ukraine 1: 100,000. URL: http://maps.vlasenko.net(Last accessed 25.04.2020).
  1. Public cadastral map of Ukraine. URL: http://map.land.gov.ua/kadastrova-karta (Last accessed 25.04.2020).
  1. Berlyant A.M. Geoinformation mapping. Moscow ,1997. 64 p. [in Russian].
  2. Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 7, IAEA, Vienna, 2015.
  3. Criteria for Use in Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-2, IAEA, Vienna. 2011.
  1. Prister B. Model of Radionuclide Uptake by Plants via Foliar Pathway: Kyshtym, Сhernobyl, Fukushima. Behavior of Radionuclides in the Environment. III Fukushima (Eds. K. Nanba, A. Konoplev, T. Wada). Springer, Singapore, 2022. P. 389—424. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6799-2_18

Chapter 5 

  1. Prister B.S., Aleksakhin R.M., Bebeshko V.G. et al. The Chernobyl disaster: The effectiveness of measures to protect the population, the experience of international cooperation. Kyiv, Energy and electrification, 2007. 100 p. [in Russian].
  1. Ilyazov R.G., Sirotkin A.N., Kruglikov B.P. et al. Ecological and radiobiological consequences of the Chernobyl catastrophe for animal husbandry and ways to overcome them. Kazan, Phaeton, 2002. 330 p. [in Russian].
  2. Prister B.S. Problems of agricultural radiobiology and radioecology under environmental pollution with a young mixture of nuclear fission products. Chornobyl, Institute for Safety Problems of NPP of NAS of Ukraine, 2008. 320 p. [in Russian].
  1. Prister B.S., Loshchilov N.A., Nemets O.F., Poyarkov V.A. Fundamentals of Agricultural Radiology. Kyiv, Urozhay, 1991. 472 p. [in Russian].
  1. Prister B.S., Barjakhtar V.G., Perepelyatnikova L.V., Vynogradskaja V.D., Rudenko V.A., Grytschuk N.R. and Ivanova T.N. Experimental substantiation in parametrization of the model describing 137Cs and 90Sr behavior in a soil-plant system. Environment Science and Pollution Research, 2003. No.1. P. 126—136.
  2. Generic Assessment Procedures for Determining Protective Actions during a Reactor Accident. IAEA-TECDOC-955. IAEA. Vienna, 1997.
  3. Norms of Radio Safety of Ukraine NRBU-97: State Hygienic Norms/Ministry of Health (MH). Kiev, Publisher the polygraph of the Ukrainian Center for the State Sanitary and Epidemiological Department of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, 1997. 121 p. [in Ukrainian].
  4. Criteria for Use in Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-2, IAEA, Vienna, 2011.
  1. Allowable levels for radionuclides 137Cs and 90Sr in food products and drinking water: Resolution of the St. Dr. of Ukraine, dated 03.05.2006. [in Ukrainian].
  1. Prister B.S. Problems of predicting the behavior of radionuclides in the soil-plant system. Adaptation of the agroecosphere to the conditions of technogenesis (Ed. R.G. Ilyazov). Kazan, FEN, 2006. P. 85—127. [in Russian].
  1. Lev T.D., Prister B.S., Vinogradskaya V.D. Geoinformation technology for the formation of a monitoring network for territories contaminated as a result of a radiation accident, taking into account the degree of radioecological criticality: Thesis of XXV Annual Scientific Conference of the Institute of Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv, April 16—20, 2018). Kyiv, 2018. P.219. [in Russian].
  2. Berlyant A.M. Geoinformation mapping. Moscow, 1997. 64 p. [in Russian].
  3. Lev T.D., Piskun V.N., Vinogradskaya V.D., Tishchenko O.G. Creation and organization of interaction of a complex of spatial databases for solving problems of numerical modeling and assessment of the radiation situation in emergency response systems. Problems of nuclear power plants’ safety and of Chornobyl. 2016. Issue 26. P. 103—112. [in Russian].

CONCLUSIONS 

  1. Khmelnytsky NPP Power Unit No. 2. Environmental impact assessment. Volume 3. Book 2. Section 3. General characteristics of the power unit and economic activities in the zone of its influence. 43-915.201.012. OB03.02, rev. 1. 2000. 134 p. [in Russian].
  2. Safety analysis report. Safety feasibility study. Unit No. 5. Zaporizhzhya NPP. No. 21.5.70.OB.05.04. Chapter 4 “NPP Safety Analysis”. Kyiv, NNEGC “Energoatom”, 1999 [in Russian].
  3. Aleksakhin R.M., Buldakov L.A., Gubanov V.A. et al. Major radiation accidents: consequences and protective measures. Moscow, IzdAT, 2004. 752 p. [in Russian].
  4. Prister B.S., Aleksakhin R.M., Bebeshko V.G., Likhtarev I.A., Ivanov V.K., Kruk Yu. The Chornobyl disaster: the effectiveness of measures to protect the population, the experience of international cooperation. Kyiv, Energetika i elektrifikatsiya, 2007. 100 p. [in Russian].
  5. Kovgan L.N., Likhtarev I.A. General external and internal exposure of the population of Ukraine for 15 years after the Chornobyl accident and risk prediction. International Journal of Radiation Medicine. 2002. Vol. 4, no. 1–4. P. 79—98. [in Russian].
  6. 20 years of the Chornobyl disaster. Looking to the future: National report of Ukraine. Kyiv, Attica, 2006. 224 p. [in Ukrainian].
  7. Thirty years of the Chornobyl disaster: radiological and medical consequences: National Report of Ukraine. Kyiv, 2016. 177 p. [in Ukrainian].
  8. Prister B.S., Kluchnikov A.A., Baryakhtar V.G., Shestopalov V.M., Kukhar V.P. Nuclear Power Security Issues. Chornobyl lessons. 2nd ed., supplemented. Chornobyl, 2016. 356 p. [in Russian].
  1. Voitsekhovych O., Giriy V.A. Current state and prospects of development of the national network of radiation monitoring of the environment. Papers of the Central Geophysical Observatory. 2021. Issue 17 (31). P. 70—82 [in Ukrainian].
  1. Talerko M., Garger E., Lev T., Nosovskyi A. Atmospheric Transport of Radionuclides Initially Released as a Result of the Chernobyl Accident. Chapter 1. In: Behavior of Radionuclides in the Environment II. Chernobyl. Eds. A. Konoplev, K. Kato, S. Kalmykov. Singapore, Springer, 2020. P. 3—74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3568-0_1
  2. Guidelines on Soil and Vegetation Sampling for Radiological Monitoring, Technical Reports Series No. 486, IAEA, Vienna, 2019.
  3. Prister B.S. Methodical recommendations for conducting complex (radioecological, chemical) monitoring of soils and landscapes in the vicinity of the NPP. In: Guidelines for organizing monitoring of the state of the environment in the area of the NPP location (Ed. Makhonko K.P.). Leningrad, Hydrometeoizdat, 1990. P. 239—249 [in Russian].

 

 

 

Related Post

Books Scientific book Scientific monographs

Hallmarks of Ukrainian Literature in Europe: Volodymyr Vynnychenko’s Emigrant Works within the Cross-Cultural Paradigm

Books Science for all

Ukrainian Sixties Movement as a Phenomenon of World Culture

Books Scientific book Scientific monographs

Energy-efficient thermal processing technologies for dry powdered protein-carbohydrate composite concentrates