{"id":7055,"date":"2025-12-17T16:06:23","date_gmt":"2025-12-17T16:06:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/uk\/?p=7055"},"modified":"2026-04-20T09:35:24","modified_gmt":"2026-04-20T09:35:24","slug":"essays-on-the-logic-ontology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/en\/books\/scientific_monographs\/essays-on-the-logic-ontology\/","title":{"rendered":"Essays on the Logic, Ontology, and Axiology of Modern Scientific Knowledge"},"content":{"rendered":"

Authors:<\/strong>
\nHardashuk Tetiana Vasylivna
\nHabovych Oleksandr Markovych
\nKuznetsov Volodymyr Ivanovych
\nOmelianchyk Valentyn Yosypovych
\nNavrotskyi Volodymyr Viacheslavovych
\nVasylchenko Andrii Anatoliiovych
\nViatkina Nataliia Borysivna
\nMaievskyi Oleksandr Leontiiovych
\nKokhan Yaroslav Oleksiiovych<\/p>\n

Editor-in-Chief:\u00a0<\/strong> T.V. Hardashuk, Doctor of Philosophy<\/p>\n

Reviewers:<\/strong>
\nYa.V. Liubyvyi, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor
\nV.I. Dodonova, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor
\nM.I. Boichenko, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor<\/p>\n

\n
Year:<\/strong>\u00a02025<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Pages:<\/strong>\u00a0 256<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
ISBN:<\/strong> 978-966-360-563-0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
Publication Language:<\/strong>\u00a0Ukrainian<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Publisher:<\/strong>\u00a0PH \u201cAkademperiodyka\u201d<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Place Published:<\/strong>\u00a0Kyiv<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

DOI: <\/strong>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15407\/akademperiodyka.563.256<\/a><\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n

The book is dedicated to a comprehensive philosophical analysis of the role of science and scientific knowledge in solving the problems of modernity (application of artificial intelligence, deepening environmental and economic crises, accelerating climate change, aggravation of conflicts and war, including information war). The authors also explore scientific values \u200b\u200band the interaction of science with other social institutions, driven by the challenges of our days.
\nTheoretical conclusions and practical recommendations can be applied in the development of the theory of decision-making and models and algorithms for timely response to crisis phenomena, in particular, in the field of public administration, development of communication strategies and counteraction to hybrid warfare, formation of conceptual principles and approaches to the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine and European integration.
\nThe book is addressed to scientists, teachers, and university students, to everyone interested in the problems of logic, philosophy, and methodology of science.<\/p>\n

\n

References:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Essay 1<\/p>\n

Abakumov, V. N., Perel, V. Y., Yassyevych, Y. N. (1997). Bezyzluchatelnaia rekombynatsyia v poluprovodnykakh. Sankt-Peterburh: Peterburhskyi yn-t yadernoi fyzyky ym. B. P. Konstantynova RAN.<\/p>\n

Abolina, T. (2002). Tsinnosti moralni. Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk (s. 708). Kyiv: Abrys, Kyiv.<\/p>\n

Ahatstsy, E. (1998). Moralnoe yzmerenye nauky y tekhnyky. Moskva: Moskovskyi fylosofskyi fond.<\/p>\n

Bohush, A. A. (2003). Vvedenye v kalybrovochnuiu polevuiu teoryiu elektroslabykh vzaymodeistvyi. Moskva: Edytoryal URSS.<\/p>\n

Bohush, A. A., Moroz, L. H. (2004). Vvedenye v teoryiu klassycheskykh polei. Moskva: Edytoryal URSS.<\/p>\n

Burhyn, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1988). Teoretychnost, konstruktyvnost y strukturnost kak svoistva elementov nauchnykh teoryi. V: Teoryia, lohyka poznanyia: Preprynty dokladov sovetskykh uchenykh k Vosemnadtsatomu Vsemyrnomu. fylosofskomu. konhressu \u00abFylosofskoe ponymanye cheloveka\u00bb, 21-27 avhusta 1988 h. (s. 46-52). Moskva: Yn-t fylosofyy AN SSSR.<\/p>\n

Burhyn, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1989). Tsennosty v strukture teoretycheskoho znanyia. V: Dyalektyka. Perestroika. Chelovek: Vsesoiuz. nauch.-prakt. konf., 16-19 maia 1989 h. (s. 3-5). Mynsk.<\/p>\n

Burhyn, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1991). Aksyolohycheskye aspekty nauchnykh teoryi (s. 99). Kyev: Nauk. dumka.<\/p>\n

Veber, M. (1998). Pro vnutrishnie poklykannia do nauky. U: Veber, M. Sotsiolohiia. Zahalnoistorychni analizy. Polityka (s. 310-337). Kyiv: Osnovy.<\/p>\n

Vithenshtain, L. (1995). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: Filosofski doslidzhennia. Ye. Popovych (Per.). Kyiv: Osnovy.<\/p>\n

Volkenshtein, M. (1999). Krasota nauky. Nauka y tekhnyka. https:\/\/n-t.ru\/tp\/br\/kn.htm<\/a><\/p>\n

Habovych, O., Kuznietsov, V. (2015a). Problemy yak vnutrishni struktury system naukovoho znannia. U: Filosofski dialohy2015. Do 85-richchia akademika M. Popovycha. Filosofiia. Kultura. Suspilstvo (s. 132-154). Kyiv: In-t filosofii imeni H. S. Skovorody.<\/p>\n

Habovych, O., Kuznietsov, V. (2015b). Shchodo vyznachennia novyzny naukovoho znannia. V: Mezhdunar. konf. \u00abIII Vesennye nauchnye chtenyia\u00bb, 14 marta 2015 (s. 43-47). Kharkov: Nauchno-ynformatsyonnyi tsentr \u00abZnanye\u00bb.<\/p>\n

Habovych, O., Kuznietsov, V. (2016). Krytyka yak sine qua non naukovoho postupu. U: Mizhnar. konf. \u00abFilosofiia dialohu y porozuminnia v pobudovi yevropeiskoi y svitovoi spilnot\u00bb (s. 48-50). Lviv: Lvivskyi nats. un-t imeni Ivana Franka.<\/p>\n

Habovych, O., Kuznietsov, V. (2020). Teoretychna fizyka. U: Velyka ukrainska entsyklopediia. https:\/\/vue.gov.ua<\/a><\/p>\n

Habovych, O., Kuznietsov, V. (2021a). Materialnist svitu ta poniattia obiektyvnosti pryrodnychykh nauk u svitli vdoskonalennia tekhnichnykh zasobiv doslidzhennia. U: L. Hriffen (Red.). Materialy 20 Vseukr. nauk. konf. \u00abAktualni pytannia istorii nauky i tekhniky\u00bb (s. 43-46). Kyiv: Tsentr pamiatkoznavstva NAN Ukrainy i UTOPIK.<\/p>\n

Habovych, O. Kuznietsov, V. (2021b). Uposlidzhennia zakhidnoi nauky yak symptom zanepadu vsiiei tsyvilizatsii . Sensor Electronics and Microsystem Technologies, 18(2), 33-46.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18524\/1815-7459.2021.2.235210<\/a><\/p>\n

Habovych, O. Kuznietsov, V. (2023). Filosofiia naukovykh teorii. Narys pershyi: nazvy ta realii. Kyiv: Nauk. dumka. https:\/\/philpapers.org\/rec\/KUZOGA<\/a><\/p>\n

Habovych, O. Kuznietsov, V. Semenova, N. (2016). Ukrainska fundamentalna nauka i yevropeiski tsinnosti (2-he vyd., dopov.). Kyiv: VD \u00abKyievo-Mohylianska akademiia\u00bb. https:\/\/philpapers.org\/rec\/GABUFS<\/a><\/p>\n

Halylei, H. (1987). Probyrnykh del master (s. 208). Moskva: Nauka.<\/p>\n

Heizenberh, V. (1987). Shahy za horyzont. Moskva: Prohress.<\/p>\n

Hynzburh, V. L. (2009). Ob ateyzme, relyhyy y svetskom humanyzme (2-e yzd., dop.). Moskva: FYAN.<\/p>\n

Holbakh, P. (1987). Halereia sviatykh. Moskva: Polytyzdat.<\/p>\n

Hrybbyn, D., Hrybbyn, M. (2002). Rychard Feinman: zhyzn v nauke. Moskva; Yzhevsk: Yn-t kompiuternykh yssledovanyi.<\/p>\n

Dokinz, R. (2018). Iliuziia boha. Kharkiv: Klub simeinoho dozvillia.<\/p>\n

Yehorchenko, I. (2016). Vystup na obhovorenni \u00abKontseptsii rozvytku Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy na 2014-2023 roky\u00bb. V: O. Habovych, V. Kuznietsov, N. Semenova. Ukrainska fundamentalna nauka i yevropeiski tsinnosti (2-he vyd., dopov., s. 185-194). Kyiv: VD \u00abKyievo-Mohylianska akademiia\u00bb. https:\/\/philpapers.org\/rec\/GABUFS<\/a><\/p>\n

Zamiatyn, E. (1989). Yzbrannye proyzvedenyia. Moskva: Sovetskyi pysatel.<\/p>\n

Yvyn, A. (2006). Aksyolohyia. Moskva: Vysshaia shkola.<\/p>\n

Yolon, P., Krymskyi, S., Parakhonskyi, B. (1989). Ratsyonalnost v nauke y kulture. Kyev: Nauk. dumka.<\/p>\n

Kaneman, D. (2014). Dumai medlenno\u2026 reshai bystro. Moskva: AST.<\/p>\n

Kaneman, D., Slovyk, P., Tversky, A. (2005). Pryniatye reshenyi v neopredelennosty: Pravyla y predubezhdenyia. Kharkov: Yn-t prykladnoi psykholohyy \u00abHumanytarnyi Tsentr\u00bb.<\/p>\n

Katsnelson, M. (2019, Kviten 13-19). Kury ne vynni, abo yak ochystyty nashu nauku vid plahiatoriv ta falsyfikatoriv. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. https:\/\/zn.ua\/ukr\/science\/kuri-ne-vinni-308411.html<\/a> \u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/parl2.hs13.0019<\/a><\/p>\n

Kyssel, M. A. (1983). Tsennostei teoryia. V: Fylosofskyi entsyklopedycheskyi slovar (s. 763). Moskva: Sovetskaia entsyklopedyia.<\/p>\n

Kosidovskyi, Z. (1978). Bibliini opovidannia. Kyiv: Politvydav.<\/p>\n

Krymskyi, S., Kuznetsov, V. (1983). Myrovozzrencheskye katehoryy v sovremennom estestvoznanyy. Kyev: Nauk. dumka.<\/p>\n

Kuznetsov, V. (1977). Fylosofskyi analyz osnovanyi fyzyky elementarnykh chastyts. Kyev: Nauk. dumka.<\/p>\n

Kuznetsov, V. (1983). O teoretycheskykh kryteryiakh novyzny znanyia v fyzyke. V: M. Popovych (Red.). Puty formyrovanyia novoho znanyia v sovremennoi nauke (s. 121- 148). Kyev: Nauk. dumka.<\/p>\n

Kuznietsov, V. (2019a). Bahatovariantnist rozvytku system naukovoho znannia. V: H. D. Berehova (Red). Filosofski obrii sohodennia: Zbirnyk tez VII Mizhnar. naukovo-prakt. konf. (s. 95-98). Kherson.<\/p>\n

Kuznietsov, V. (2019b). Naukovo-tsentrovani filosofii yak zasib podolannia nihilizmu shchodo filosofii . U: N. Zlenko, T. Ponomarenko (Red.). Vyklyky KhKhI stolittia: nauka, filosofiia, osvita: Materialy Mizhnar. naukovo-prakt. konf., 21-22 lystopada 2019 r. (s. 3-7). Sumy: FOP Tsoma S. P.<\/p>\n

Lamont, K. (1984). Ylliuzyia bessmertyia (2-e yzd.). Moskva: Polytyzdat.<\/p>\n

Lisovyi, V. (2002). Tsinnist. U: Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk (s. 707). Kyiv: Abrys.<\/p>\n

Novykov, S. (2006). Vtoraia polovyna XX veka y ee ytoh: kryzys fyzyko-matematycheskoho soobshchestva v Rossyy y na Zapade. Vestnyk DVO RAN, 4 (15).<\/p>\n

Orvell, Dzh. (2015). 1984. Bucha: Vyd-vo Zhupanskoho.<\/p>\n

Pennok, R. (2016). Plekannia kultury etychnoi tsilisnosti nauky: pravovyi ta tsinnisnyi pidkhody. V: O. Habovych, V. Kuznietsov, N. Semenova. Ukrainska fundamentalna nauka i yevropeiski tsinnosti (2-he vyd., dopov., s. 269-274). Kyiv: VD \u00abKyievo-Mohylianska akademiia\u00bb. https:\/\/philpapers.org\/rec\/GABUFS<\/a><\/p>\n

Pidlisnyi, M., Shubin, V. (2017). Filosofiia tsinnostei. Istoriia i suchasnist. Dnipro: Dnipropetrovskyi derzh. un-t vnutrishnikh sprav.<\/p>\n

Puankare, A. (1989). Tsennost nauky. V: A. Puankare. O nauke (s. 197-366). Moskva: Nauka.<\/p>\n

Rassel, B. (2004). Brak y moral. Moskva: Kraft+.<\/p>\n

Tvardovskyi, K. (2016). Pro hidnist universytetu. V: O. Habovych, V. Kuznietsov, N. Semenova. Ukrainska fundamentalna nauka i yevropeiski tsinnosti (2-he vyd., dopov., s. 148-152). Kyiv: VD \u00abKyievo-Mohylianska akademiia\u00bb. https:\/\/philpapers.org\/rec\/GABUFS<\/a><\/p>\n

Torn, K. (2007). Chernye dyry y skladky vremeny. Derzkoe nasledye Einshteina (s. 467- 468). Moskva: Fyzmatlyt.<\/p>\n

Universytet shtatu Michyhan. (2016). Yaki tsinnosti vazhlyvi dlia vchenoho? V: O. Habovych, V. Kuznietsov, N. Semenova. Ukrainska fundamentalna nauka i yevropeiski tsinnosti (2-he vyd., dopov., s. 267-268). Kyiv: VD \u00abKyievo-Mohylianska akademiia\u00bb.<\/p>\n

Shokhyn, K. (2010). Aksyolohyia. V Novaia fylosofskaia entsyklopedyia (T. 1, s. 62). Moskva: Mysl.<\/p>\n

Ferhiuson, N. (2017). Tsyvilizatsiia. Yak Zakhid stav uspishnym. Kyiv: Nash Format.<\/p>\n

FES – Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk. (2002). (s. 14). Kyiv: Abrys.<\/p>\n

Fuller, L. L. (1999). Moral prava. N. Komarova (Per.). Kyiv: Sfera.<\/p>\n

Yakovenko, N. (2007). Vstup do istorii . Kyiv: Krytyka.<\/p>\n

Abimbola, K. O. (1993). Scientific Rationality and Methodological Change: A Critical Examination of Some Recent Attempts to Naturalize Methodology. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.<\/p>\n

Adam, B. (1998). Values in the cultural timescapes of science. Cultural Values, 2(2-3), 385-402. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14797589809359306<\/a><\/p>\n

Agazzi, E., Minazzi F. (\u0415ds). (2008). Science and Ethics. The Axiological Contexts of Science. Bern; Berlin; Frankfurt am Main; New York; Oxford; Wien: Peter Lang.<\/p>\n

Alai, M., Buzzoni, M., Tarozzi, G. (\u0415ds). (2015). Science Between Truth and Ethical Responsibility. Evandro Agazzi in the Contemporary Scientific and Philosophical Debate. Cham: Springer.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-16369-7<\/a><\/p>\n

Alfano, M. (\u0415d.). (2015). Current Controversies in Virtue Theory. New York; London: Routledge.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315728001<\/a><\/p>\n

Allan, L. (2016). Towards an Objective Theory of Rationality. http:\/\/www.rationalrealm.com\/philosophy\/epistemology\/objective-theory-rationality.html<\/a><\/p>\n

Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science. An educational perspective. Science & Education, 8(1), 1-12.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1008600230536<\/a><\/p>\n

Allen, P., Varga, L. (2001). Complexity: the co-evolution of epistemology, axiology and ontology. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 11(1), 19-50.<\/p>\n

Anderson, C. D. (1932). The apparent existence of easily deflectable positives. Science, 76 (1967), 238-239. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.76.1967.238<\/a><\/p>\n

Angelou, M. (2014). Rainbow in the Cloud (\u0440. 63). New York: Random House.<\/p>\n

Aristotle (1998). The Metaphysics. London: Penguin Books. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oseo\/instance.00264022<\/a><\/p>\n

Artigas, M. (2008). Values in science. In: E. Agazzi, F. Minazzi (\u0415ds). Science and Ethics. The Axiological Contexts of Science (\u0440p. 115-124). Bern; Berlin; Frankfurt am Main; New York; Oxford; Wien: Peter Lang.<\/p>\n

Audi, R. (2007). The Architecture of Reason. The Structure and Substance of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

Autschbach, J. (2012). Orbitals: some fiction and some facts. J. Chem. Educ, 89(8), 1032- 1040. https:\/\/doi.org\/1040.10.1021\/ed200673w<\/a><\/p>\n

Azoury, M., Kaissi, B., Attieh, L. (2018). Research Ethics. In: J. G\u00f3mez, S. Mouselli (\u0415ds). Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment. Methodologies and Cases in Business Research (\u0440p. 111-126). Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-74173-4_7<\/a><\/p>\n

Baehr, J. (2011). The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199604074.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Baehr, J. (\u0415d.). (2016). Intellectual Virtues and Education. Essays in Applied Virtue Epistemology. New York: Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315714127<\/a><\/p>\n

Bahm, A. J. (\u0415d.). (1992). Axiology. The Science of Values. Poznan: Rodopi. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004463615<\/a><\/p>\n

Ba\u015fdemir, A. (2025). An Institutional Approach to Values Perspectives on Scientific Data Sharing and Reuse. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies In: partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Calgary, Alberta.<\/p>\n

Barrotta, P. (2018). Scientists, Democracy and Society. A Community of Inquirers. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-74938-9<\/a><\/p>\n

Barrow, J. D., Tipler, F. J. (1986). The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. New York: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

Bedau, M. (2004). A case study in objectifying values in science. In: P. Machamer, G. Wolters (\u0415ds). Science, Values, and Objectivity (\u0440p. 190-219). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/j.ctt5vkg7t.14<\/a><\/p>\n

Benedetto de, M., Luchetti, M. (2023). Specialisation by value divergence: The role of epistemic values in the branching of scientific disciplines. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02698595.2023.2233822<\/a><\/p>\n

Benedict, B. (2001). Curiosity: A Cultural History of Early Modern Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<\/p>\n

Berg, R. (2009). Evaluating scientific theories. Philosophy Now July\/August 2009. (\u0440p. 14- 17). https:\/\/philosophynow.org\/issues\/74\/Evaluating_Scientific_Theories<\/a><\/p>\n

Bergan, W. (2015). Applications of group theory to fundamental particle physics. https:\/\/klixx.people.wm.edu\/teaching\/math300\/bergan.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Bergstr\u00f6m, L. (1996). Scientific value. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 10(3), 189-202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02698599608573539<\/a><\/p>\n

Bertolotti, T. (2015). Patterns of Rationality. Recurring Inferences in Science, Social Cognition and Religious Thinking. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-17786-1<\/a><\/p>\n

Bigu, D. (2014). The place of values in scientific knowledge. Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 11(1), 193-217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5840\/cultura201411111<\/a><\/p>\n

Billings, L. (2024). Can scientific thinking save the world? Scientific American. April. https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/3-ways-scientific-thinking-could-helpsave-the-world\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Bimonte, G., Emig, T., Kardar, M., Kruger, M. (2017). Nonequilibrium fluctuational quantum electrodynamics: heat radiation, heat transfer, and force. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 8, 119-143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-conmatphys031016-025203<\/a><\/p>\n

Bobylev, V. V., Bajkova, A. T. (2023). Review of current estimates of the Galaxy mass. Publications of the Pulkovo Observatory 228. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31725\/0367-7966-2023-228-3<\/a><\/p>\n

Bossert, W., Suzumura, K. (2010). Consistency, Choice and Rationality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/j.ctvjhzq9s<\/a><\/p>\n

Boyer, T. H. (2018). Blackbody radiation in classical physics: A historical perspective. American Journal of Physics, 86(7), 495-509. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1119\/1.5034785<\/a><\/p>\n

Boyer, T. H. (2019). Stochastic electrodynamics: the closest classical approximation to quantum theory. Atoms, 7(1), 29. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/atoms7010029<\/a><\/p>\n

Boyer, T. H. (2021). Thermal radiation equilibrium: (nonrelativistic) classical mechanics versus (relativistic) classical electrodynamics. European Journal of Physics, 42(5). 055102. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/1361-6404\/abffee<\/a><\/p>\n

Brigandt, I. (2015). Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories. Beyond inductive risk. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 45(3), 326-356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00455091.2015.1079004<\/a><\/p>\n

Bronowski, J. (1973). The principle of tolerance. https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/magazine\/toc\/1973\/12\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Brown, M. (2013). Values in science beyond underdetermination and inductive risk. Philosophy of Science 80(5), 829-839. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/673720<\/a><\/p>\n

Buchanan, M. (2023). A post-particle future. Nature Physics, 19(9), 1223. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41567-023-02193-2<\/a><\/p>\n

Buchwald, J. Z., Warwick, A. (\u0415ds). (2001). Histories of the Electron. The Birth of Microphysics. Cambridge; MA. London: The MIT Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7551\/mitpress\/3526.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Burgin, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1987). Scientific theory and its axiology. In: J. Fenstad, I. Frolov, R. Hilpinen (\u0415ds). Abstracts of the Eighth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. (Vol. 4 (1), \u0440p. 116-118). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR.<\/p>\n

Burgin, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1993a). Properties in science and their modelling. Quality and Quantity, 27, 371-382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF01102499<\/a><\/p>\n

Burgin, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1993b). The beauty measures of a scientific theory. In: R. Harre (\u0415d). Anglo-Ukrainian Studies in the Analysis of Scientific Discourse. Reason and Rhetoric (\u0440p. 69-93). Lewiston; Queenstown; Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press.<\/p>\n

Burhoe, R. (1969). Values via science. Zygon. Journal of Religion and Science, 4(1), 65-99 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9744.1969.tb00895.x<\/a><\/p>\n

Callebaut, W. (Ed.). (1993). Taking the Naturalistic Turn or How Real Philosophy of Science Is Done. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.<\/p>\n

Carrier, M. (2013). Values and objectivity in science: Value-ladenness, pluralism and the epistemic attitude. Science & Education, 22(10), 2547-2568. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11191-012-9481-5<\/a><\/p>\n

Chadwick, J. (1932). Possible existence of a neutron. Nature, 129(3252), 312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/129312a0<\/a><\/p>\n

Chang, R. (2015). Value pluralism. In: J. Wright (\u0415d.). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 25, \u0440p. 21-26). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-0-08-097086-8.63090-8<\/a><\/p>\n

Cheyne, C., Worrall, J. (2006). Rationality and Reality. Conversations with Alan Musgrave. Dordrecht: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/1-4020-4207-8<\/a><\/p>\n

Christophorou, L. (2018). Emerging Dynamics Science, Energy, Society and Values (\u0440p. 97- 117). Berlin: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-90713-0<\/a><\/p>\n

Cond\u00e9, M. L., Salomon, M. (\u0415ds). (2023). Handbook for the Historiography of Science. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-27510-4<\/a><\/p>\n

Crisp, R. (1998). Fact\/value distinction. In: E. Craig (\u0415d.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Version 1.0). London and New York: Routledge.<\/p>\n

Cze\u017cowski, T. (2000). Knowledge, Science and Values. A Program for Scientific Philosophy. Amsterdam: Rodopi. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004457683<\/a><\/p>\n

Danks, D., Ippoliti, E. (\u0415ds). (2018). Building Theories. Heuristics and Hypotheses in Sciences. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-72787-5<\/a><\/p>\n

Daston, L., Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.<\/p>\n

Davson-Galle, P. (2002). Science, values and objectivity. Science & Education, 11(2), 191- 202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1014412500803<\/a><\/p>\n

Del Re, G. (2001). Ethics and science. HYLE – International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 7(2), 85-102.<\/p>\n

Demeter, T., Murphy, K., Zittel, C. (\u0415ds). (2015). Conflicting Values of Inquiry: Ideologies of Epistemology in Early Modern Europe. Leiden: Brill. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004282551<\/a><\/p>\n

Dirac, P. A. M. (1928). The quantum theory of the electron. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 117 (778), 610-24. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rspa.1928.0023<\/a><\/p>\n

Dongen van, J., Paul, H. (Eds.). (2017). Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities. \u0421ham: Spr\u0456nger.<\/p>\n

Doppelt, G. (2013). Values in science. In: M. Curd, S. Psillos (\u0415ds). The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. 2nd ed., p. 346-357. London: Routledge.<\/p>\n

Dorato, M. (2004). Epistemic and nonepistemic values in science. In: P. Machamer, G. Wolters (\u0415ds). Science, Values, and Objectivity (\u0440p. 52-77). Pittsburgh. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/j.ctt5vkg7t.7<\/a><\/p>\n

Douglas, H. (2013). The value of cognitive values. Philosophy of Science, 80(5), 796-806. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/673716<\/a><\/p>\n

Dyakonov, M., Efros, A., Merkulov, I., Shklovskii, B. (2008). Vladimir Idelevich Perel. Phys. Today, 61 (7), 65-66. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1063\/1.2963018<\/a><\/p>\n

Echeverr\u00eda, J. (2013). Some questions from the point of view of an axiology of science. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 81(1), 311-315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004333222_034<\/a><\/p>\n

Editorial (2018). Nobel committees must do more to achieve equality. Nature, 562(7726), 164. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-018-06951-8<\/a><\/p>\n

Editorial (2024). Retractions are part of science, but misconduct isn’t – lessons from a superconductivity lab. Nature, 628(8009), 689-690. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-024-01174-6<\/a><\/p>\n

Einstein, A., Stern, O. (1913). Einige Argumente f\u00fcr die Annahme einer molekularen Agitation beim absoluten Nullpunkt. Annalen der Physik, 345(3), 551-560. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/andp.19133450309<\/a><\/p>\n

Elliott, K. (2017). A Tapestry of Values. An Introduction to Values in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780190260804.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Elliott, K., McKaughan, D. (2009). How values in scientific discovery and pursuit alter theory appraisal. Philosophy of Science, 76(5), 598-611. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/605807<\/a><\/p>\n

Elliott , K., McKaughan, D. (2014). Nonepistemic values and the multiple goals of science. Philosophy of Science, 81(1), 1-21. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/674345<\/a><\/p>\n

Elliott, K., Richards T. (\u0415ds.). (2017). Exploring Inductive Risk. Case Studies of Values in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780190467715.003.0013<\/a><\/p>\n

Elliott , K., Willmes, D. D. (2013). Cognitive attitudes and values in science. Philosophy of Science, 80(5), 807-817. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/673719<\/a><\/p>\n

Ellis, B. (1988). Solving the problem of induction using a values-based epistemology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39(2), 141-160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjps\/39.2.141<\/a><\/p>\n

Engle, E. (2008). Ontology, epistemology, axiology. Bases for a comprehensive theory of Law. Appalachian Journal of Law Winter 2008. http:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=1268528<\/a><\/p>\n

Fairweather, A. (\u0415d.). (2014). Virtue Epistemology Naturalized. Bridges Between Virtue Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-04672-3<\/a><\/p>\n

Fairweather, A., Zagzebski, L. (Eds.). (2001). Virtue Epistemology. Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780195140774.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Ferguson, N. (2004). Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power. New York: Basic Books.<\/p>\n

Ferguson, N. (2005). Colossus. The Rise and Fall of The American Empire. London: Penguin Books.<\/p>\n

Frampton, P. H, Kim, J. E. (2020). History of Particle Theory. Between Darwin and Shakespeare. Singapore: World Scientific. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1142\/11948<\/a><\/p>\n

Frankena, W. K. (1967). Value and valuation. http:\/\/www.encyclopedia.com\/humanities\/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps\/value-and-valuation<\/a><\/p>\n

Friedrich, B., Hoffmann, D., James, J. (2011). One hundred years of the Fritz Haber Institute. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 123(43), 10 022-10 049. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/anie.201104792<\/a><\/p>\n

Gabovich, A., Kuznetsov, V. (2019, July 15th – July 19th). Towards periodizations of science in the history of science. In: F. Seroglou, V. Koulountzos (\u0415ds.). Conference Book of Proceedings of 15th International Conference \u00abHistory, Philosophy, and Science Teaching\u00bb, Re-Introducing Science: Sculpting the Image of Science for Education and Media in Its Historical and Philosophical Background, Thessaloniki (\u0440p. 585-594). Greece.<\/p>\n

Gabovich, A., Kuznetsov, V. (2023a). Anatoly Vlasov heritage: 60-year-old controversy. European Physics Journal, 48(1), 5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1140\/epjh\/s13129-023-00051-6<\/a><\/p>\n

Gabovich, A., Kuznetsov, V. (2023b). Scientific realism from a polysystemic view of physical theories and their functioning. Global Philosophy, 33(6), 53. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10516-023-09703-0<\/a><\/p>\n

Galison, P. (2004). Mirror symmetry. Persons, values, and objects. In: M. Wise (\u0415d.). Growing Explanations: Historical Perspectives on Recent Science (\u0440p. 23-63). Durham; London: Duke University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/j.ctv11hpm7f.4<\/a><\/p>\n

Gapochenko, S., Khlyap, H. (2016). Aesthetic principles in the history of physics. Almagest. International Journal for the History of Scientific Ideas, 7(2), 105-119. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1484\/J.ALMAGEST.5.112688<\/a><\/p>\n

Gaszczyk, G. (2023). Interrogatives, inquiries, and exam questions. Erkenntnis https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10670-023-00758-4<\/a><\/p>\n

Gibney, E. (2018). Nobel committees to tackle gender skew. Nominators will be asked to consider diversity in gender. Nature, 562(7725), 19. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-018-06879-z<\/a><\/p>\n

Glynn, I. (2010). Elegance in Science: The Beauty of Simplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

G\u00f3mez, J., Mouselli, S. (\u0415ds.). (2018). Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment. Methodologies and Cases in Business Research. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-74173-4<\/a><\/p>\n

Gonzalez, W. (2013). Value ladenness and the value-free ideal in scientific research. In: Ch. Luetege. (\u0415d.). Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics (\u0440p. 1503-1521). Dordrecht: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-007-1494-6_78<\/a><\/p>\n

Gonz\u00e1lez, W. (2018). Economic values in the configuration of science. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 96(1), 85-112.<\/p>\n

Gorka, S. (2018). Why We Fight: Defeating America’s Enemies. With No Apologies. New York: Regnery Publishing.<\/p>\n

Gouttenoire, Y. (2022). Beyond the Standard Model Cocktail. Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY and Hamburg University. https:\/\/www.academia.edu\/102905634\/<\/a>\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-11862-3<\/a><\/p>\n

Guill\u00e1n, A. (2017). Axiological elements of scienti\ufb01c prediction. In: A. Guill\u00e1n. Pragmatic Idealism and Scienti\ufb01c Prediction (\u0440\u0440. 251-284). Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-63043-4_8<\/a><\/p>\n

Gutzwiller, M. G. (1998). Moon-Earth-Sun: The oldest three-body problem. Rev. Mod. Phys, 70,(2), 589-639. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1103\/RevModPhys.70.589<\/a><\/p>\n

Haddock, A., Millar, A., Pritchard, D. (\u0415ds.). (2009). Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199231188.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Hargittai, I. (2011). Drive and Curiosity. What Fuels the Passion for Science. New York: Prometheus Books.<\/p>\n

Hauser, M. (2006). Moral Minds. How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York: Harper Collins.<\/p>\n

Henning, T., Schweikard, D. (\u0415ds.). (2013). Knowledge, Virtue, and Action. Putting Epistemic Virtues to Work. New York and London: Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780203098486<\/a><\/p>\n

Hensel, W., Mi\u0142kowski, M., Nowakowski, P. (2022). Without more theory, psychology will be a headless rider. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45(20). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0140525X21000212<\/a><\/p>\n

Hicks, D., Stapleford, Th. (2016). The virtues of scienti\ufb01c practice: MacIntyre, virtue ethics, and the historiography of science. ISIS. A Journal of the History of Science, 107(3), 449-72. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/688346<\/a><\/p>\n

Hoeckley, C. (1998). Good Science: Ethical, Prudential and Aesthetic Factors in Accepting Scienti\ufb01c Hypotheses. Dissertation. The Claremont Graduate University.<\/p>\n

Hookway, C. (1994). Cognitive virtues and epistemic evaluations. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2(2), 211-227. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09672559408570791<\/a><\/p>\n

Ioannidis, J. P. A., Klavans, R., Boyack, K. W. (2018). Thousands of scientists publish a paper every \ufb01ve days. Nature, 561(7722), 167-169. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-018-06185-8<\/a><\/p>\n

Ivanova, M. (2017a). Aesthetics in science. Philosophy Compass, 12(10), 1-9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/phc3.12433<\/a><\/p>\n

Ivanova, M. (2017b). Poincar\u00e9’s aesthetics of science. Synthese, 194(7), 2581-2594. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1069-1<\/a><\/p>\n

Jankowska, M., Martynoga, M. (2016). A few words on ethics of scienti\ufb01c research. World Scienti\ufb01c News, 57, 324-331.<\/p>\n

Jenkins, Z. (2003). Do you need to believe in orbitals to use them?: Realism and the autonomy of chemistry. Philosophy of Science 70(5), 1052-1062. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/377388<\/a><\/p>\n

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A. (1982). (\u0415ds.). Judgment Under Uncertainty. Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511809477<\/a><\/p>\n

Karp, M. (2023). George Orwell and Russia. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5040\/9781788317160<\/a><\/p>\n

Karstens, B. (2017). \u00abThe lonely form dies\u00bb: how epistemic virtues connect Roman Jakobson’s New Science of language and his personality. In: J. van Dongen, H. Paul. (\u0415ds.). Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities (\u0440p. 149-171). Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-48893-6_10<\/a><\/p>\n

Keas, M. N. (2018). Systematizing the theoretical virtues. Synthese, 195, 2761-2793. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-017-1355-6<\/a><\/p>\n

Kennedy, D. (1997). Academic Duty. London: Harvard University Press.<\/p>\n

Kincaid, H., Dupr\u00e9, J., Wylie, A. (2007). Value-Free Science. Ideals and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195308969.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

King, J., McLure, M. (2015). Value. History of the concept. In: J. Wright (\u0415d.). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 25, \u0440p. 7-13). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-0-08-097086-8.03123-8<\/a><\/p>\n

Kirchin, S. (2018). Thick Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780198803430.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Koepsell, D. (2017). Scienti\ufb01c Integrity and Research Ethics. An Approach from the Ethos of Science. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-51277-8<\/a><\/p>\n

Koertge, N. (2005a). A Bouquet of Scienti\ufb01c Values. In: N. Koertge. (\u0415d.). Scienti\ufb01c Values and Civic Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/0195172256.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Koertge, N. (\u0415d.). (2005b). Scienti\ufb01c Values and Civic Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/0195172256.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Kuhn, T. (1977), Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In: T. Kuhn. The Essentialension (\u0440p. 320-333). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<\/p>\n

Kuznetsov, V. (2021), Modi\ufb01ed structure-nominative reconstruction of practical physical theories as a frame for the philosophy of physics. Epistemolohichni doslidzhennia v filosofii, sotsialnykh i politychnykh naukakh, 4(1), 20-28. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15421\/342103<\/a><\/p>\n

Labarca, M., Lombardi, O. (2010). Why orbitals do not exist? Found. Chem, 12(2), 149-157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10698-010-9086-53<\/a><\/p>\n

Laudan, L. (1984a). Pseudo-science of science. In: J. R. Brown. (\u0415d.). Scienti\ufb01c Rationality. The Sociological Turn. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands (\u0440p. 41-74). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-015-7688-8_2<\/a><\/p>\n

Laudan, L. (1984b). Science and Values. The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scienti\ufb01c Debate. Berkeley: University of California Press.<\/p>\n

Lawrence, P. (2008). Lost in publication. How measurement harms science. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 9-11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3354\/esep00079<\/a><\/p>\n

Levin, M. L., Rytov, S. M. (1967). Theory of Equilibrium Thermal Fluctuations in Electrodynamics. Moscow: Nauka.<\/p>\n

Longino, H. E. (1996). Cognitive and non-cognitive values in science: Rethinking the dichotomy. In: L. H. Nelson, J. Nelson (\u0415ds.). Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science (\u0440p. 39-58). Netherlands: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-009-1742-2_3<\/a><\/p>\n

Longino, H. E. (2004). How values can be good for science. In: P. Machamer, G. Wolters (\u0415ds.). Science, Values, and Objectivity (\u0440p. 127-142). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/j.ctt5vkg7t.11<\/a><\/p>\n

Lunteren van, F. H., Hollestelle, M. J. (2013). Paul Ehrenfest and the dilemmas of modernity. Isis. A Journal of the History of Science, 104(3), 504-536. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/673271<\/a><\/p>\n

MacDonald, H. (2018). The Diversity Delusion. New York: St. Martin’s Press.<\/p>\n

Machamer, P., Wolters, G. (\u0415ds.). (2004). Science, Values, and Objectivity. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/j.ctt5vkg7t<\/a><\/p>\n

MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue (3rd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.<\/p>\n

Magnani, L. (2007). Morality in a Technological World. Knowledge as Duty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511498657<\/a><\/p>\n

Marcus, A. (2018). A scientist’s fraudulent studies put patients at risk. Science, 362(6413), 394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.362.6413.394-a<\/a><\/p>\n

Marshall, T. W. (1963). Random electrodynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 276(1367), 475-491. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rspa.1963.0220<\/a><\/p>\n

Martinson, B., Anderson, M., Vries de, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737-738. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/435737a<\/a><\/p>\n

Marx, W. (2014). The Shockley-Queisser paper – A notable example of a scienti\ufb01c sleeping beauty. Ann. Phys. 526, 5-6: A41-A45. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/andp.20140080<\/a><\/p>\n

Marx, W., Cardona, M. (2004). Blasts from the past. Phys. World, 17(2), 14-15. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/2058-7058\/17\/2\/21<\/a><\/p>\n

McCook, A. (2018a). Fallout for co-authors. Science, 362(6413), 394-395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.362.6413.394-b<\/a><\/p>\n

McCook, A. (2018b). One publisher, more than 7000 retractions. Science, 362(6413), 393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.362.6413.393<\/a><\/p>\n

Meis, C. (2017). Light and Vacuum. The Wave Particle Nature of the Light and the Quantum Vacuum. Electromagnetic Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics Beyond the Standard Model (2nd ed.). Singapore: World Scienti\ufb01c. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1142\/10450<\/a><\/p>\n

Mele, A., Piers, R. (2004) (\u0415ds.). The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780199752393.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Melo-Mart\u00edn de, I., Intemann, K. (2012). Interpreting evidence. Why values can matter as much as science. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 55(1), 59-70. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/pbm.2012.0007<\/a><\/p>\n

Melville, W., Campbell, T., Jones, D. (2019). Axiology, the subject and the chair. Research in Science Education, 49, 679-69. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11165-017-9646-y<\/a><\/p>\n

Menapace, M. (2018). Scienti\ufb01c ethics. A new approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(101),1-24. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-018-0050-4<\/a><\/p>\n

Minazzi, F. (2008). The axiological dimension of science. In: E. Agazzi, F. Minazzi (\u0415ds.). Science and Ethics. The Axiological Contexts of Science (\u0440p. 83-100). Bern; Berlin; Frankfurt am Main; New York; Oxford; Wien: Peter Lang.<\/p>\n

Montano, U. (2013). Beauty in science: A new model of the role of aesthetic evaluations in science. Eur. J. Phil. Sci., 3(2), 133-156. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13194-013-0064-3<\/a><\/p>\n

Myrvold, W. C. (2012). Epistemic values and the value of learning. Synthese, 187(2), 547- 568. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-010-9860-x<\/a><\/p>\n

Newman, J. H. (1990). The Idea of a University. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.<\/p>\n

Noether, E. (1918). Invariante Variationsprobleme. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G\u00f6ttingen (\u0440. 235-257). Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse.<\/p>\n

Nozick, R. (1993). The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9781400820832<\/a><\/p>\n

Nuzzo, R. (2015). How scientists fool themselves – and how they can stop. Nature, 526(7572), 182-185. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/526182a<\/a><\/p>\n

O’Loughlin, I., VcCallum, K. (2018). The aesthetics of theory selection and the logics of art. Philosophy of Science, 86(2), 325-343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/701953<\/a><\/p>\n

Olson, J. (2005). Axiological Investigations. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.<\/p>\n

Orwell, G. (2013). The Complete Works. Delphi Classics.<\/p>\n

Pais, A. (1979). Einstein and the quantum theory. Rev. Mod. Phys., 51(4), 863-914. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1103\/RevModPhys.51.863<\/a><\/p>\n

Paul de, M., Zagzebski, L. (\u0415ds.). (2003). Intellectual Virtue. Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

Peels, R. (2018). Epistemic values in the humanities and in the sciences. History of Humanities, 3(1), 97. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/696304<\/a><\/p>\n

Pe\u00f1a de la, L., Ce-o, A. M. (1996). The Quantum Dice. An Introduction to Stochastic Electrodynamics. Dordrecht: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-015-8723-5<\/p>\n

Pe\u00f1a de la, L., Ce-o, A. M., Vald\u00e9s-Hern\u00e1ndez, A. (2015). The Emerging Quantum. The Physics Behind Quantum Mechanics. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-07893-9<\/a><\/p>\n

Plait, P. (2023). How seeing the \u041cilky way helped us discover the whole Universe. https:\/\/www.scienti\ufb01camerican.com\/article\/how-seeing-the-milky-way-helped-us-discover-the-whole-universe\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Priest, S., Goodwin, J., Dahlstrom, M. F. (\u0415ds.). (2018). Ethics and Practice in Science Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7208\/chicago\/9780226497952.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Purdy, R. (2023). Particle Physics. An Introduction (2nd ed.). Dulles; Boston; New Delhi: Mercury Learning and Information. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9781683928768<\/a><\/p>\n

Radder, H. (\u0415d.). (2010). The Commodi\ufb01cation of Academic Research. Science and the Modern University. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.<\/p>\n

Regt de, H. W. (2020). Understanding, values, and the aims of science. Philosophy of Science, 87(5), 921-932. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/710520<\/a><\/p>\n

Resnik, D. (1988). The Ethics of Science. An Introduction. London and New York Routledge.<\/p>\n

Richter, B. (2006). Theory in particle physics: Theological speculation versus practical knowledge. Physics Today, 59(10), 8-9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1063\/1.2387062<\/a><\/p>\n

Roberts, B., Wood, W. (2007). Intellectual Virtues. An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199283675.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Roberts, P. (2011). Putting knowledge in its place. Virtue, value, and the internalism\/externalism debate. Philosophical Studies, 159(2), 241-61. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-011-9700-y<\/a><\/p>\n

Roman, P. (1961). Theory of Elementary Particles (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Romero, G. (2018). Outline of a theory of scienti\ufb01c aesthetic. Foundations of Science, 23(4), 795-807. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10699-018-9551-5<\/a><\/p>\n

Rooney, P. (1992). On Values in Science: Is the Epistemic\/Non-Epistemic Distinction Useful? PSA. Contributed Papers, 1, 13-22. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/psaprocbien-meetp.1992.1.192740<\/a><\/p>\n

Rosenblum, B., Ku-ner, F. (2006). Quantum Enigma. Physics Encounters Consciousness (\u0440. 6). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780195175592.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Ross, A. (Ed.). (1996). Science Wars. Duke University Press Durham and London. Roy, A. E. (2004). Orbital motion (4th ed.). Rota Bacon: CRC Press.<\/p>\n

Roychoudhuri, C., Kracklauer, A. F., Creath, K. (2008). The Nature of Light. What Is a Photon? Boca Raton: CRC Press.<\/p>\n

Ryan, S. (2003). Objectivism and the Corruption of Rationality. A Critique of Ayn Rand’s Epistemology. New York: Writers Club Press.<\/p>\n

Sante di, D. et al. (2023). Flat band separation and robust spin Berry curvature in bilayer kagome metals. Nature Physics, 19(8), 1135-1142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41567-023-02053-z<\/a><\/p>\n

Sarkar, H. (2007). Group Rationality in Scienti\ufb01c Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511498565<\/a><\/p>\n

Sayer, A. (2011). Why Things Matter to People. Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511734779<\/a><\/p>\n

Scerri, E. R. (2000). Have orbitals really been observed? J. Chem. Educ., 77(11), 1492-1494. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1021\/ed077p1492<\/a><\/p>\n

Scerri, E. R. (2001). The recently claimed observation of atomic orbitals and some related philosophical issues. Philosophy of Science, 68(S3), S76-S88. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/392899<\/a><\/p>\n

Schindler, S. (2018). Theoretical Virtues in Science. Uncovering Reality Through Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781108381352<\/a><\/p>\n

Schweber, S. (2000). In the Shadow of the Bomb: Oppenheimer, Bethe, and the Moral Responsibility of the Scientist. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1063\/1.1292484<\/a><\/p>\n

\u0160e\u0161elja, D., Kosolosky, L., Stra\u00dfer, Ch. (2012). The rationality of scienti\ufb01c reasoning in the context of pursuit: drawing appropriate disctinctions. Philosophica, 86, 51-82. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21825\/philosophica.82146<\/a><\/p>\n

Shanin, A. (2016). A critical axiology for big data studies. Palabra Clave, 19(4), 972-996. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5294\/pacla.2016.19.4.2<\/a><\/p>\n

Shapin, S. (2008). The Scienti\ufb01c Life. A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7208\/chicago\/9780226750170.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Sharma, D., Singh, V., Tripathi, A., Mahapatra, P. (2022). History of the standard model in particle physics. https:\/\/evincism.com\/history-development-of-particle-phys-ics-and-the-standard-model\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Shrader-Frechette, K. (2008). Ideological toxicology. Invalid logic, science, ethics about low-dose pollution. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 27, 647-657. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0960327108098491<\/a><\/p>\n

Smith, B., Thomas, A. (1998). Axiology. In: E. Craig (\u0415d.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Version 1.0. London; New York: Routledge.<\/p>\n

Snider, E., Dasenbrock-Gammon, N., McBride, R., Debessai, M., Vindana, H., Vencatasamy, K, Lawler, K. V., Salamat, A., Dias, R. P. (2022). Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride. Nature, 586(7829), 373-377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-020-2801-z<\/a><\/p>\n

Sokal, A., Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable Nonsense. Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. New York: Picador. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1063\/1.882506<\/a><\/p>\n

Spohn, W. (2002). The many facets of the theory of rationality. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 2(6), 249-264.<\/p>\n

Spohn, W. (2004). On the objectivity of facts, beliefs, and values. In: P. Machamer, G. Wolters (\u0415ds.). Science, Values, and Objectivity (\u0440p. 172-189). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/j.ctt5vkg7t.13<\/a><\/p>\n

Spratt, E.L., Elgammal, A. (2015). Computational Beauty: Aesthetic Judgment at the Inter- section of Art and Science (pp. 35-53). In: Agapito, L., Bronstein, M., Rother, C. (Eds.). Computer Vision – ECCV 2014 Workshops. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8925. Springer, Cham. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-16178-5_3<\/a><\/p>\n

Standard Model (2023). https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Standard_Model<\/a><\/p>\n

Stump, D. (2007). Pierre Duhem’s virtue epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, A 38(1), 149-159. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.shpsa.2006.12.010<\/a><\/p>\n

The Standard Model (2023). https:\/\/home.cern\/science\/physics\/standard-model<\/a><\/p>\n

Thomas, A. (1998). Values. In: E. Craig (\u0415d.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Version 1.0. London; New York: Routledge.<\/p>\n

Universit\u00e0 di Bologna (2023). Quantum materials: Electron spin measured for the \ufb01rst time by Universit\u00e0 di Bologna. https:\/\/phys.org\/news\/2023-06-quantum-materi-als-electron.html<\/a><\/p>\n

Vecchia di, P. (2008). The birth of string theory. In: M. Gasperini, J. Maharana (\u0415ds.). String Theory and Fundamental Interactions. Gabriele Veneziano and Theoretical Physics: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Lecture Notes in Physics (\u0440p. 59-118). Berlin: Springer.<\/p>\n

Weingart, P. (2004). Between Science and Values. In: P. Machamer, G. Wolters (\u0415ds.). Science, Values, and Objectivity (\u0440p. 112-126). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/j.ctt5vkg7t.10<\/a><\/p>\n

Weirich, P. (2009). Collective Rationality. Equilibrium in Cooperative Games. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780195145397.003.0020<\/a><\/p>\n

Wells, J. D. (2020). Discovery Beyond the Standard Model of Elementary Particle Physics. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-38204-9<\/a><\/p>\n

Wheeler, J. (1954). Letter to John von Neumann. \u0426\u0438\u0442. \u0437\u0430: Rickles, D. Geon Wheeler: from nuclear to spacetime physicist. EPJ H, Vol. 43, 243-265 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1140\/epjh\/e2018-80053-x<\/a><\/p>\n

Wilczek, F. (2015). A Beautiful Question. Finding Nature’s Deep Design. New York: Penguin Press<\/p>\n

Williams, P. (2023). Philosophy of Particle Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009205382<\/a><\/p>\n

W\u00fcthrich, A. (2010). The Genesis of Feynman Diagrams. Dordrecht: Springer, Dordrecht. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-90-481-9228-1<\/a><\/p>\n

Yang, Seolmin, Youn, Hyejin (2023). Capturing Values at the Boundaries. arxiv.org\/pdf\/2311.16360<\/p>\n

Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the Mind. An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9781139174763<\/a><\/p>\n

Zahar, P., Bartlett, S. (2002). Basic emotions and their biological substrates: A nominalistic interpretation. Consciousness & Emotion, 2(2), 189-221. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/ce.2.2.02zac<\/a><\/p>\n

Zenker, F. G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (2014, 27-28 March). Communication, Rationality, and Conceptual Changes in Scienti\ufb01c Theories: Meeting of the Nordic Network for Philosophy of Science. Lund, Sweden). http:\/\/philsci-archive.pi-.edu\/10367\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Essay 2<\/p>\n

Omelianchyk, V. (1989). Myr, struktura, vozmozhnost. V: M. Popovych (Red.). Struktura i smysl. Kyiv.<\/p>\n

Aharonov, Y., Anandan, J., Vaidman, L. (1993). Meaning of the wave function. Physical Review, 47(6). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1103\/PhysRevA.47.4616<\/a><\/p>\n

Alter, O., Yamamoto, Y. (2001). Quantum measurement of a single system. New York: JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9783527617128<\/a><\/p>\n

James, R. (2020, April) Beebe and Finnur Dells\u00e9n, Scienti\ufb01c Realism in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Seven Sciencesand History and Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science, 87, 336-364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/707552<\/a><\/p>\n

Bhaskar, R. (1975). Realist Theory of Science<\/p>\n

Bhaskar, R. (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism. A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences.<\/p>\n

Bohm, D., Hiley, B. (1995). The Undivided University: an ontological interpretation of quantum theory. Rougtlage: NY-L.<\/p>\n

Brading, K. (2011). Structuralist Approaches to Physics: Objects, Models and Modality. \u0406n: M. Massimi, A. Bokulich, P. Bokulich (\u0415ds.) Scienti\ufb01c Structuralism. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-90-481-9597-8_3<\/a><\/p>\n

Bush, J. W. M. (2015). The new wave of pilot-wave theory. Physics Today, 68(8), 47. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1063\/PT.3.2882<\/a><\/p>\n

Bush, J., Oza, A. (2021). Hydrodynamic quantum analogs. Rep. Prog. Phys, 84. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/1361-6633\/abc22c<\/a><\/p>\n

Carnap, R. (1991). Logical Foundations of the Unity of Science. In: R. Boyd, P. Gasper, J. D. Trout (\u0415ds.). The philosophy of science. Massachusetts: The MIT Press Cambridge.<\/p>\n

Cartwright, N. (1999). Models and the limits of theory: quantum Hamiltonians and the BCS model of superconductivity. \u0406n: Models as mediators. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511660108.010<\/a><\/p>\n

Cartwright, N. (2000). The Dappled World. A Study of the Boundaries of Science. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9781139167093<\/a><\/p>\n

Cartwright, N. (2010). Models: Parables v Fables Roman. \u0406n: F. Ma-hew, C. Hunter. Mimesis \u0430nd Convention. Representation. Art \u0430nd Science. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-90-481-3851-7_2<\/a><\/p>\n

Chattaraj, P. (\u0415d.) (2010). Quantum Trajectories. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.<\/p>\n

Couder, Y., Proti\u00e8re, S., Fort, E., & Oudaoud, A. (2005). Dynamical phenomena: walking and orbiting droplets. Nature, 437(208). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/437208a<\/a><\/p>\n

Devitt, M. (1994). Realism and Truth, Princeton (2ed ed.). NJ: Princeton University Press.<\/p>\n

Devitt, M. (1999). A naturalistic defense of realism. In: S. D. Hales (Ed.). Metaphysics: Contemporary readings (pp. 90-103). Belmont; CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.<\/p>\n

Devitt, M. (2010). Putting Metaphysics First. New York: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199280803.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Devitt, M. (2017). Naturalistic Defence of Realism. In: The Problem of Realism. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315185507-2<\/a><\/p>\n

Devitt, M. (2020). An Ignored Argument for Scienti\ufb01c Realism, Filozo\ufb01a Nauki (The Philosophy of Science) (Vol. 28(2), \u0440\u0440. 5-24). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14394\/filnau.2020.0007<\/a><\/p>\n

Dummett, M. (1978). Truth and Other Enigmas. Cambridge; MA: Harvard University Press.<\/p>\n

D\u00fcmont, J. (1999). Putnam’s Model-Theoretic Argument(s). A Detailed Reconstruction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 30, 341-364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1008369914990<\/a><\/p>\n

Elder-Vass, D. (2005). Emergence and the Realist Account of Cause. Journal of Critical Realism, 4(2), 315-338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1558\/jocr.v4i2.315<\/a><\/p>\n

English, J. (1973). Underdetermination: Craig and Ramsey. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(14), 453-462. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2025109<\/a><\/p>\n

Esfeld, M. (2015). Review of (Steven French, 2014). Mind,124(493), 334-338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/fzu191<\/a><\/p>\n

Fraassen van, B. (1980). The Scienti\ufb01c Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/0198244274.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Fraassen van, B. (1989). Laws and Symmetry. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/0198248601.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Fraassen van, B. (1994). Gideon Rosen \u043en Constructive Empiricism. Philosophical Studies, 74(2).https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00989802<\/a><\/p>\n

French, S., Ladyman, J. (2003, Jul.). Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics \u0430nd The Metaphysics \u043ef Structure. Synthese, 136(1), 31-56. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1024156116636<\/a><\/p>\n

French S., Ladyman J. (2011). In Defence of Ontic Structural Realism. \u0406n: M. Massimi, Bokulich, P. Bokulich (\u0415ds.) Scienti\ufb01c Structuralism. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-90-481-9597-8_2<\/a><\/p>\n

French, S. (2014). The Structure of the World. Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford UP https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199684847.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Giere, R. (2008). Why Scienti\ufb01c Models Should Not Be Regarded as Works of Fiction. \u0406n: M. Su\u00e1rez (\u0415d.). Fictions in science: philosophical essays on modeling and idealization. Routledge.<\/p>\n

Giere, R. (2010). Explaining Science. A Cognitive Approach.<\/p>\n

Gi\ufb00ord, M. (2019). Reconsidering Devitt on Realism and Truth. Erkenntinis, 86(6), 1367-1380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10670-019-00158-7<\/a><\/p>\n

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2006). The strategy of model-based science. Biological Philosophy, 21, 725-740. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10539-006-9054-6<\/a><\/p>\n

Gonzalez, M. F., Gimenez, X., Gonzalez-Aguilar, J., Bo\ufb01ll, J. M. (2007). Quantum Trajectories from a Discrete-Variable Representation Method. J. Phys. Chem. A, 111, 10226-10233. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1021\/jp072237o<\/a><\/p>\n

Grover, M. (1962). The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities. In: Feigl, G. Maxwell (\u0415d.). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 3, \u0440\u0440. 3-27). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.<\/p>\n

Gutzwiller, \u041c. (1990). Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics. NY: Springer Vg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-4612-0983-6<\/a><\/p>\n

Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511814563<\/a><\/p>\n

Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? (pp. X-261). Harvard University Press.<\/p>\n

Hacking, I. (2004). Historical Ontology. Harvard University Press.<\/p>\n

Harr\u00e9, R., Madden, E. H. (1975). Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<\/p>\n

Harr\u00e9, R., Secord, P. F. (1972). The Explanation of Social Behaviour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<\/p>\n

Humphrey, P. (\u0415d.) (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Oxford UP. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780199368815.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Joasa, C., Lehnera, C., (2009, June 16). The classical roots of wave mechanics: Schrodinger’s transformations of the optical-mechanical analogy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.shpsb.2009.06.007<\/a><\/p>\n

Kaidesoja, T. (2005). The Trouble with Trancendental Arguments: Towards a Naturalization of Roy Bhaskar’s Early Realist Ontology. Journal of Critical Realism, 4(1), 28-61. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1558\/jocr.v4i1.28<\/a><\/p>\n

Kaidesoja, T. (2007,\u00b7March). Exploring the Concept of Causal Power in a Critical Realist Tradition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1468-5914.2007.00324.x<\/a><\/p>\n

Karitzis, A. (2011, May). On Devitt’s Defence of Realism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 42(1), 61-73. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10838-011-9144-2<\/a><\/p>\n

Kemp, G., Lugg, A. (2020). Quine on Ontology: Chapter 7 of Word and Object. In: F. Jans-sen-Lauret (Ed.). Quine, Structure, and Ontology. Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780198864288.003.0009<\/a><\/p>\n

Kukla, A. (1998). Studies in Scienti\ufb01c Realism (\u0440. 90). Oxford: Oxford UP. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780195118650.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Kusch, M. (2002). Metaphysical d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu: Hacking and Latour on science studies and metaphysics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 639-647 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0039-3681(01)00037-1<\/a><\/p>\n

Kusch, M. (2010). Hacking’s historical epistemology: a critique of styles of reasoning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41, 158-173. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.shpsa.2010.03.007<\/a><\/p>\n

Ladyman, J. (1998). What is Structural Realism? Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci., 29(3), 409-424. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0039-3681(98)80129-5<\/a><\/p>\n

Ladyman, J. (2000, Dec.). What’s Really Wrong with Constructive Empiricism? Van Fraassen and the Metaphysics of Modality. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51(4), 837-856. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjps\/51.4.837<\/a><\/p>\n

Leifer, S. (2014). Is the Quantum State Real? An Extended Review of \u03c8-ontology Theorems. Quanta, 3(1), 67-155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12743\/quanta.v3i1.22<\/a><\/p>\n

Mart\u00ednez Rodr\u00edguez, M.-L. (2021). Texture in the Work of Ian Hacking. Michel Foucault as the Guiding Thread of Hacking’s Thinking. Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-64785-8<\/a><\/p>\n

Massimi, M. (2008, Oct.). Why There are No Ready-Made Phenomena: What Philosophers of Science Should Learn From Kant, (Vol. 63, \u0440\u0440. 1-35). Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1358246108000027<\/a><\/p>\n

Massimi, M. (2011). Structural Realism: A Neo-Kantian Perspective. \u0406n: M. Massimi, A. Bokulich, P. Bokulich (\u0415ds.). Scienti\ufb01c Structuralism (1-25). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-90-481-9597-8_1<\/a><\/p>\n

Massimi, M. (2018). Perspectival modeling. Philosophy of Science, 85(3), 335-359. Massimi, M., Bokulich, A., Bokulich, P. (\u0415ds.) (2011). Scienti\ufb01c Structuralism. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/697745<\/a><\/p>\n

Mcarthur, D. (2006, Jul.). Contra Cartwright: Structural Realism, Ontological Pluralism And Fundamentalism About Laws. Synthese, 151(2), 233-255. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-004-5406-4<\/a><\/p>\n

McCall, S. (2003, Jan.). Review \u00abThe Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, by Nancy Cartwright\u00bb. Mind, New Series, 112(445), 99-106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/112.445.99<\/a><\/p>\n

Morgan, M. S., Morrison, M. (\u0415ds.) (1999). Models as mediators. Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge UP. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511660108<\/a><\/p>\n

Morrison M., Morgan, M.-S. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. \u0406n Models as mediators. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511660108.003<\/a><\/p>\n

Nussinov, S. (1998). Realistic Experiments for Measuring the Wave Function of a Single. Particle, Foundations of Physics, 28 (6), 865-880. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1018891028578<\/a><\/p>\n

Omel’yanchyk, V. (1991). Soviet philosophy. \u0406n: H. Burkhardt, B. Smith (\u0415ds.). Handbook in Metaphysics and Ontology (Vol. 2, pp. 848-850). Munchen.<\/p>\n

Penrose, R. (1989). The emperor’s new mind. Oxford Un. Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780198519737.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511625398<\/a><\/p>\n

Putnam H. (1994). Sense, Nonsense, and the Senses: An Inquiry into the Powers of the Human Mind. The Journal of Philosophy, 91(9), 445-517. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2940978<\/a><\/p>\n

Quine, W., Goodman, N. (1947). Steps Toward a Constructive Nominalism. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 13(1), 49-50. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2267526<\/a><\/p>\n

Quine, W. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia UP. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7312\/quin92204<\/a><\/p>\n

Rebufello, E., Piacentini, F., Avella, A., Lussana, R., et al. (2021). Protective Measurement – A New Quantum Measurement Paradigm: Detailed Description of the First Realization. Appl. Sci., 11, 42-60. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/app11094260<\/a><\/p>\n

Resnik, M. (2020). Quine’s non-ontological structuralism (and mine). \u0406n: F. Janssen-Lau- rent (\u0415d.). Qunie, Structure and Ontology (\u0440\u0440. 7-26). Oxford UP. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780198864288.003.0002<\/a><\/p>\n

Rochefort, P.-Y. (2021). Did Putnam Really Abandon Internal Realism in the 1990s? European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 8(2). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4000\/ejpap.2515<\/a><\/p>\n

Ronald, N. (1985). Giere Constructive Realism. \u0406n Imagies of Sciences (\u0440\u0440. 75-98).<\/p>\n

Ronald, N. (2006). Giere – Scienti\ufb01c Perspectivism.<\/p>\n

Rosen, G. (1994). What is Constructive Empiricism? Philosophical Studies, 74, 143-178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00989801<\/a><\/p>\n

Rouse, J. (1998). New Philosophies of Science in North America – Twenty Years Later. Journal for General Philosophy of Sciences, 29, 71-122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1008259514953<\/a><\/p>\n

Samir, O. (2016). Philosophy of Science – A Very Short Introduction.<\/p>\n

Sarkar, S., Pfeifer, J. (\u0415ds.) (2005). Philosophy of Science – An Encyclopedia.<\/p>\n

Sankey, H. (2018). Putnam’s Internal Realism in Retrospect. Analisis. Revista de investigation Filoso\ufb01ca, 5(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.26754\/ojs_arif\/a.rif.201812921<\/a><\/p>\n

Simchen, O., Putnam, H. (2005). The philosophy of science: an encyclopedia (\u0440. 623).<\/p>\n

Tumulka, R. (2019). Bohmian Mechanics. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/71080.4071<\/p>\n

Winsberg, E. (2003). Simulated experiments: Methodology for a virtual world. Philosophy of Science, 70, 105-125. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/367872<\/a><\/p>\n

Worrell, J. (1989). Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds? Dialectica, 43, 99-124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x<\/a><\/p>\n

Essay 3<\/p>\n

Ushkalov, L. (Red.). (2011). Skovoroda H. Povna akademichna zbirka tvoriv. Kharkiv; Ed- monton; Toronto: Maidan: Vyd-vo Kanadskoho instytutu ukrainskykh studii.<\/p>\n

Ainslie, G. (2008). Breakdown of Will. In: J. Adler, L. Rips (Eds.). Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and Its Foundations (\u0440\u0440. 156-186). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511814273.010<\/a><\/p>\n

Barbalet, J. M. (2004). Emotion, Social Theory, and Social Structure: A Macrosociological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<\/p>\n

Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2003). Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks. J. Logic Computat, 13(3), 429-448. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429<\/a><\/p>\n

Brandolini, Silva Marzetti Dall’Aste (2011). Moral Good and Right Conduct. In: Silva Marzetti Dall’Aste Brandolini, R. Scazzieri (Eds.). Fundamental Uncertainty. Rationality and Plausible Reasoning (\u0440\u0440. 294-330). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1057\/9780230305687_12<\/a><\/p>\n

Camus, A. (1955). The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. London: Hamish Hamilton. Doyle, J., Thomason, R. H. (1999). Background to Qualitative Decision Theory. AI Magazine,\u00a0 55 (68).<\/p>\n

Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Arti\ufb01cial Intelligence, 77, 321-357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X<\/a><\/p>\n

Hage, J. (2005). Studies in Legal Logic. Dordrecht: Springer.<\/p>\n

Dhami, S., \u0410l-Nowaihi, A. (2021) Rationality in Economics: Theory and Evidence. In: M. Knau\ufb00, W. Spohn (Eds.). The Handbook of Rationality (\u0440\u0440. 565-576). Cambridge; Massachusetts; London: The MIT Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7551\/mitpress\/11252.003.0059<\/a><\/p>\n

Gordon, T. F. (2018). De\ufb01ning Argument Weighing Functions. IFCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 5(3), 747-773.<\/p>\n

Lorini, E. (2017). Logics for Games, Emotions and Institutions. IFCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 4(9), 3075-3113.<\/p>\n

Miyata, M., Omori, T. (2018). Modeling emotion and inference as a value calculation system. Procedia Computer Science, 123, 295-301. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.procs.2018.01.046<\/a><\/p>\n

Modgil, S., Prakken, H. (2017). Abstract Rule-Based Argumentation. IFCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 4(8), 2319-2406.<\/p>\n

Perea, A. (2021). Epistemic Game Theory. In: M. Knau\ufb00, W. Spohn (Eds.). The Handbook of Rationality (\u0440\u0440. 543-551). Cambridge; Massachuse-s; London: The MIT Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7551\/mitpress\/11252.003.0057<\/a><\/p>\n

Plantin, C. (2004). On the inseparability of emotion and reason in argumentation. In:\u00a0 E. Weigand (Ed.). Emotions in dialogic interactions (\u0440\u0440. 265-275). Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/cilt.248.18pla<\/a><\/p>\n

Pollock, J. L. (1995). Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. Cambridge; Massachusetts; London: A Bradford Book; The MIT Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Pollock, J. L. (2006). Thinking about Acting. Logical Foundations for Rational Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195304817.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G. (2002). Logics for Defeasible Argumentation. In: D. Gabbay, F. Guenthner (\u0415ds.). Handbook of Philosophical Logic (Vol. 4, 2nd ed., 219-318). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-017-0456-4_3<\/a><\/p>\n

Prakken, H. (2017). Historical Overview of Formal Argumentation. IFCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 4(8), 2183-2262.<\/p>\n

Smith, C. A., Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Emotion and Adaptation, In: L. A. Pervin (Ed.). Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (\u0440\u0440. 609-637). New York: Guilford.<\/p>\n

Sousa de, R. (2008). Logic and Biology: Emotional Inference and Emotions in Reasoning. \u0406n: J. Adler, L. Rips (\u0415d.). Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and Its Foundations (\u0440\u0440. 1002-1015). New York: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511814273.053<\/a><\/p>\n

Weide van der, T. L. (2011). Arguing to Motivate Decisions. SIKS Dissertation Series, 33. Printed by W\u0151hrmann Print Service.<\/p>\n

Weide van der, T. L., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J. Ch., Prakken, H., and Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (2009, May 12). Practical Reasoning Using Values: Giving Meaning to Values. Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems: 6th International Workshop, ArgMAS 2009 (Vol. 6, \u0440\u0440. 79-93). Budapest: Revised Selected and Invited Papers. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-12805-9_5<\/a><\/p>\n

Essay 4<\/p>\n

Arieti, S. (1955). Some aspects of language in schizophrenia. In: H. Werner (\u0415d.). On Expressive Language: Papers Presented at the Clark University Conference on Expressive Language Behavior (\u0440\u0440. 53-67). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/411370<\/a><\/p>\n

Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity. The Magic Synthesis. New York: Basic Books.<\/p>\n

Arieti, S. (1978). From primary process to creativity. J Creat, 12(4), 225-246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/j.2162-6057.1978.tb00171.x<\/a><\/p>\n

Auchincloss, E. L., Samberg, E. (\u0415ds.). (2012). Psychoanalytic Terms and Concepts. Lon- don: Yale University Press.<\/p>\n

Battilotti, G. (2014). Symmetry vs. Duality in Logic: An Interpretation of Bi-Logic to Model Cognitive Processes Beyond Inference. Int J Cognit Informat Nat Intell, 8(4), 83-97 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4018\/ijcini.2014100105<\/a><\/p>\n

Battilotti, G., Borozan M., and Lauro Grotto, R. (2023). The Modal Components of Judgements in a Quantum Model of Psychoanalytic Theory. Entropy, 25, \u0440. 1057. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/e25071057<\/a><\/p>\n

Bazan, A., Kim Van, D., Kock de, L., Brakel, L. A. W., Geerardyn, F., and Shevrin, H. (2013). Empirical evidence for Freud’s theory of primary process mentation in acute psycho- sis. Psychoanal Psychol, 30, 57-74. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0027139<\/a><\/p>\n

Bell, D. (2017). Unconscious phantasy: Some historical and conceptual dimensions. Int J Psychoanal, 98(3), 785-798. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1745-8315.12586<\/a><\/p>\n

Boag, S. (2014). Ego, drives, and the dynamics of internal objects. Frontiers in Psychoanalysis and Neuropsychoanalysis, 5, 1-13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2014.00666<\/a><\/p>\n

Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child’s tie to his mother. Int J Psycho-Anal, 39, 350-373.<\/p>\n

Brakel, L. A. W. (2009). Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, and the a-Rational Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/med\/9780199551255.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Brakel, L. A. W. (2015). Two fundamental problems for philosophical psychoanalysis. In: S. Boag, L. A. W. Brakel, L. Talvitie. Philosophy, Science, and Psychoanalysis. A Critical Meeting. London: Karnac Books (pp. 119-143). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429478277-6<\/a><\/p>\n

Brakel, L. A. W. (2018). The Primary Process: Bridges to Interdisciplinary Studies of Mind. Psychoanal Inq, 38(3), 177-185. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07351690.2018.1430964<\/a><\/p>\n

Breuer, J., Freud, S. (1953 (1895)). Studies on Hysteria (SE, 2, \u0440\u0440. 1-335).<\/p>\n

Brodie, B. (2020). Object Relations and Intersubjective Theories in the Practice of Psychotherapy. London: Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780367855697<\/a><\/p>\n

Chambers, J. (2017). The Neurobiology of Attachment: From Infancy to Clinical Outcomes. Psychodyn Psychiatry, 45(4), 542-563. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1521\/pdps.2017.45.4.542<\/a><\/p>\n

Domarus von, E. (1944). The speci\ufb01c laws of logic in schizophrenia. In: J. S. Kasanin (\u0415d.).<\/p>\n

Language and thought in schizophrenia: collected papers. Berkeley: University of California Press.<\/p>\n

Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1994 (1943)). Phantasy and Inner Reality. In: D. E. Schar\ufb00, E. F. Birtles (\u0415d.). From Instinct to Self (Vol. 2, \u0440\u0440. 557-560). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.<\/p>\n

Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1944). Endopsychic structure considered in terms of object-relationships. The Int J Psychoanal, 25, 70-93.<\/p>\n

Freud, S. (1953 (1899)). The Interpretation of Dreams. In: S. Freud. SE IV-V (ix-627). Freud, S. (1957 (1915)). The Unconscious. In: S. Freud. SE XIV (159-190).<\/p>\n

Greenberg, J., Mitchell, S. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Boston: Harvard University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/j.ctvjk2xv6<\/a><\/p>\n

Grotstein, J. S. (1997). ‘Internal objects’ or ‘chimerical monsters’?: the demonic ‘third forms’ of the internal world. J Anal Psychol, 42(1), 47-80. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1465-5922.1997.00047.x<\/a><\/p>\n

Hensel, B. F. (2014). On the origin of internal objects in the works of Fairbairn and Klein and the possible therapeutic consequences. In: G. S. Clarke, D. E. Schar\ufb00 (\u0415ds.). Fairbairn and the Object Relations Tradition (147-160). London: Karnac. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429474538-13<\/a><\/p>\n

Holmes, J., Slade, A. (2019). The neuroscience of attachment: implications for psychological therapies. Br J Psychiatry, 214(6), 318-319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1192\/bjp.2019.7<\/a><\/p>\n

Isaacs, S. (1948). The nature and function of phantasy. Int J Psychoanal, 2, 73-97.<\/p>\n

Iurato, G. (2018). Computational Psychoanalysis and Formal Bi-Logic Frameworks. Hershey: IGI Global. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4018\/978-1-5225-4128-8<\/p>\n

Kernberg, O. (1976). Object-relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. New York: Jason Aronson.<\/p>\n

Khrennikov, A. (2002). Classical and Quantum Mental Models and Freud’s Theory of Unconscious\/Conscious Mind. V\u00e4xj\u00f6: V\u00e4xj\u00f6 University Press.<\/p>\n

Klein, M. (1984). Love, Guilt and Reparation and Other Works 1921-1945. London: Virago Press Ltd.<\/p>\n

Klein, M. (1984a (1930)). The importance of symbol-formation in the development of the ego. In: M.<\/p>\n

Klein. Love, Guilt and Reparation and Other Works 1921-1945 (\u0440\u0440. 219-232).<\/p>\n

Klein, M. (1984b (1940)). Mourning and its relation to manic-depressive states. In: M. Klein. Love, Guilt and Reparation and Other Works 1921-1945 (\u0440\u0440. 344-369).<\/p>\n

Knox, J. (1999). The relevance of attachment theory to a contemporary Jungian view of the internal world: internal working models, implicit memory and internal objects. J Anal Psychol, 44(4), 511-530. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1465-5922.00117<\/a><\/p>\n

Laplanche, J., Pontalis J.-B. (1973). The Language of Psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press & The Institute of Psychoanalysis.<\/p>\n

Laplanche,J. and Pontalis,J.-B.(2003(1968)).Fantasy and the origins of sexuality. In: R. Steiner Unconscious phantasy (\u0440\u0440. 107 -143). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429484469-5<\/a><\/p>\n

Lauro Grotto, R. (2008). The unconscious as an ultrametric set. The American Imago, 64(4), 52-62. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/aim.2008.0009<\/a> https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429484469-5<\/a><\/p>\n

Matte Blanco, I. (1975). The Unconscious as In\ufb01nite Sets: An Essay in Bi-Logic. London: Duckworth. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429483592<\/a><\/p>\n

Matte Blanco, I. (2005 (1988)). Thinking, Feeling, and Being. Clinical Re\ufb02ections on the Fundamental Antinomy of Human Beings and World. London: Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780203358849<\/a><\/p>\n

Mijolla, Alain de (\u0415d.). (2005). International dictionary of psychoanalysis (Vol. 1-4). New York: Thomson Gale.<\/p>\n

Mitchell, S. (1981). The origin and nature of the \u00abobject\u00bb in the theories of Klein and Fairbairn. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00107530.1981.10745670<\/a><\/p>\n

Contemp Psychoanal, 17, 374-398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00107530.1981.10745670<\/a><\/p>\n

Nanay, B. (2021). Mental Imagery. In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/win2021\/entries\/mental-imagery\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Nanay, B. (2021a). Unconscious mental imagery. Phil Trans R Soc B 376: 20190689. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rstb.2019.0689<\/a><\/p>\n

Ogden, T. H. (2004 (1986)). The Matrix of the Mind. Object Relations and the Psychoanalytic Dialogue. New York: Rowman & Little\ufb01eld Publishers. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429482403<\/a><\/p>\n

Ogden, T. H. (2011). Reading Susan Isaacs: Toward a radically revised theory of thinking. Int J Psychoanal, 92, 925-942. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1745-8315.2011.00413.x<\/a><\/p>\n

Perlow, M. (1995). Understanding Mental Objects. London & New York: Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780203360187<\/a><\/p>\n

Pitt, D. (2022). Mental Representation. In: E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman (Eds.). The Stan- ford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/fall2022\/en-tries\/mental-representation\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Priest, G. (2005). The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

Rayner, E., Tuckett, D. (2005). An introduction to Matte Blanco’s reformulation of the Freudian unconscious and his conceptualization of the internal world. In: I. Matte Blanco Thinking, Feeling, and Being. Clinical Re\ufb02ections on the Fundamental Antinomy of Human Beings and World (3-34). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780203358849-6<\/a><\/p>\n

Robbins, M. (2018). The Primary Process: Freud’s Profound Yet Neglected Contribution to the Psychology of Consciousness. Psychoanal Inq, 38(3), 186-197. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07351690.2018.1430965<\/a><\/p>\n

Saad, A. (2020). On the logic of the unconscious. Int J Psychoanal, 101(2), 239-256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00207578.2020.1726713<\/a><\/p>\n

Saad, A. (2022). On the logic of unconscious objects. Int J Psychoanal, 103(4), 581-600. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00207578.2022.2028551<\/a><\/p>\n

Sandler, J., (\u0415d.). (1988). Projection, Identi\ufb01cation, Projective Identi\ufb01cation. London: Karnac Books. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429478567<\/a><\/p>\n

Sandler, J. (1990). On internal object relations. J Amer Psychoanal Assn, 38, 859-880. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/000306519003800401<\/a><\/p>\n

Sandler, J. (1990a). On the structure of internal objects and internal object relationships.\u00a0Psychoanal Inq, 10(2), 163-181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07351699009533805<\/a><\/p>\n

Sandler, J. (2003). On attachment to internal objects. Psychoanal Inq, 23(1), 12-26. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07351692309349024<\/a><\/p>\n

Sandler, J., Sandler, A.-M. (2003 (1998)). Internal Objects Revisited. London: Karnac Books. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429476099<\/a><\/p>\n

Schar\ufb00, D. E. (\u0415d.). (2005). Object Relations Theory and Practice: An Introduction. Selected and Integrated by D. E. Schar\ufb00. New York: Rowman & Little\ufb01eld. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5040\/9798216436898<\/a><\/p>\n

Selesnick, S. A., Owen, G. S. (2012). Quantum-like logics and schizophrenia. J Appl Logic, 10, 115-126. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jal.2011.12.001<\/a><\/p>\n

Smith, D. L. (1999). Freud’s Philosophy of the Unconscious. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-017-1611-6<\/a><\/p>\n

Spillius, E. B., Milton, J., Garvey, P., Couve, C., and Steiner, D. (\u0415ds.). (2011). The New Dictionary of Kleinian Thought. London: Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780203815762<\/a><\/p>\n

Steiner, R. (2003). Introduction. In: R. Steiner (\u0415d.). Unconscious phantasy. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429484469-1<\/a><\/p>\n

Steiner, R. (\u0415d.). (2003). Unconscious phantasy. London: Karnac. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429484469<\/a><\/p>\n

Strachey J. (Ed.). (1953-1964). The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.<\/p>\n

Svrakic, D., Zorumski, C. (2021). Neuroscience of Object Relations in Health and Disorder: A Proposal for an Integrative Model. Front Psychol 12:583743 (\u0440\u0440. 1-25). https:\/\/doi.rg\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.58374\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

Torok, M. (1994 (1968)). The illness of mourning and the fantasy of the exquisite corpse. In: N. Abraham, M. Torok. The Shell and the Kernel: Renewals of Psychoanalysis (Vol. 1, \u0440\u0440. 107-124). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.<\/p>\n

VandenBos, G. R. (\u0415d.). (2015). APA Dictionary of Psychology (2nd \u0435d.). Washington: American Psychological Association. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/14646-000<\/a><\/p>\n

Vasylchenko, A. (2015). Towards the logic of projective identi\ufb01cation. J Appl Logic, 13, 197-214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jal.2015.03.008<\/a><\/p>\n

Vasylchenko, A. (2025a). Internal Object Relations and the Logic of the Unconscious. Organon F 32(2), to appear. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31577\/orgf.2025.32201<\/a><\/p>\n

Vasylchenko, A. (2025b). The Logic of Object Relations. LOGICA 2025. Abstracts. Hejnice, pp. 88-90. https:\/\/logika.\ufb02u.cas.cz\/images\/konference\/Logica2025\/L25-abstracts-compressed.pdf#page=92<\/p>\n

Weiss, E. (1939). The psychic presence. Bull Menninger Clinic, 3, 177-183.<\/p>\n

Weiss, E. (1947). Projection, Extrajection and Objectivation. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 16(3), 357-377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/21674086.1947.11925686<\/a><\/p>\n

Wollheim, R. (1984). The Thread of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<\/p>\n

Zizzi, P., Pregnolato, M. (2012). Quantum logic of the unconscious and schizophrenia. NeuroQuantology, 10(3), 566-579. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14704\/nq.2012.10.3.550<\/a><\/p>\n

Essay 5<\/p>\n

Honcharov, K. (2022). Ukraintsi vkhodiat do top-10 naineshchasnishykh natsii – sotsiolohy. U: DW. Suspilstvo: Ukraina (2022, 3 liutoho). https:\/\/www.dw.com\/uk\/ukraintsi-vkhodiat-do-top-10-naineshchasnishykh-natsii-sotsiolohy\/a-60642782<\/a><\/p>\n

Yefymenko, V. (2002). Shchastia. U Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk (s. 729). Kyiv: Abrys.<\/p>\n

Kyselov, M. M., Hardashuk, T. V., Hrabovskyi, S. I. ta in. (2024). Etyka nauky: vyklyky suchasnosti: monohrafiia. Nizhyn: Vydavets PP Lysenko M. M.<\/p>\n

Kortasar, Kh. (2009). Chytanka dlia Manuelia: roman. Kharkiv: Folio.<\/p>\n

Krymskyi, S. B. (2010). Pro sofiinist, pravdu, smysly liudskoho buttia. U: Zbirnyk naukovo-publitsystychnykh i filosofskykh statei. Kyiv.<\/p>\n

Luman, N. (2010). Realnist masmedia. V. Ivanov, M. Minakov (Red.). Kyiv: TsVP.<\/p>\n

U svitovomu reitynhu shchastia Ukraina zaimaie piate mistse z kintsia – opytuvannia (2021). U: LB. Ukraine. https:\/\/lb.ua\/society\/2021\/01\/14\/475196_svitovomu_reytingu_shchastya_ukraina.html<\/a><\/p>\n

Frankl, V. (2004). Liudyna v poshukakh spravzhnoho sensu. Kyiv: KSD.<\/p>\n

Yaroshchuk, O. (2017). (Ne)shchaslyva natsiia. Chy spravdi ukraintsi – naineshchasnishi u Yevropi? Voks Ukraina. https:\/\/voxukraine.org\/ne-shhasliva-natsiya-chi-spravdi-ukrayintsi-najneshhasnishi-u-yevropi<\/p>\n

Ballas, D. (2013). What makes a \u00abhappy city\u00bb? Cities, 32(1), 39-50. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cities.2013.04.009<\/a><\/p>\n

Besser, L. (2021). The Philosophy of Happiness. An Interdisciplinary Introduction. 1st ed. Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780415249126-L033-2<\/a><\/p>\n

Building a Sustainable and Desirable Economy-in-Society-in-Nature. Report to the United Nations for the 2012 Rio+20 Conference (2013). ANU E Press.<\/p>\n

Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The Relationship Between Nature Connectedness And Happiness: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. Sec. Cognitive Science, 5, 1-15. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2014.00976<\/a><\/p>\n

Conti de Melo, D., Roble de Elua, G. L., Santos, J. M., Corr\u00eaa, R. M. (2012). Innovative Cities: the Way of Management, Sustainability and Future. RISUS – Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, 3(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24212\/2179-3565.2012v3i1p75-88<\/a><\/p>\n

Costanza, R. (2008). Ecological Economics: Creating a Sustainable and Desirable Future. Iowa State University. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-008045405-4.00619-4<\/a><\/p>\n

Creative Cities Network. UNESCO. https:\/\/www.unesco.org\/en\/creative-cities?hub=80094<\/a><\/p>\n

Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. In: A. D. Paul (Ed.), W. Melvin (Red.). Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz. (\u0440p. 89-125). Academic Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7<\/a><\/p>\n

Frey, B. S. (2011). Peace, war, and happiness: Bruder Klaus as wellbeing facilitator. Inter- national Journal of Wellbeing, 1(2), 226-234. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5502\/ijw.v1i2.5<\/a><\/p>\n

Gardashuk, T. (2022). Environmental Threats of War in Ukraine. In: Envigogica, 17(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14712\/18023061.639<\/a><\/p>\n

Global Happiness and Wellbeing. Policy Report 2019 (2019). Global Council for Happiness and Wellbeing.<\/p>\n

Grau-Ruiz, R., L\u00f8voll, H. S., & Dyrdal, G. M. (2024). Norwegian Outdoor Happiness: Residential Outdoor Spaces and Active Leisure Time Contributions to Subjective Well-being at the National Population Level at the Start of and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Happiness Studies, 25(9). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10902-024-00732-z<\/a><\/p>\n

Gullone, E. (2000). The Biophilia Hypothesis and Life in the 21st Century: Increasing Mental Health or Increasing Pathology? Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(3), 293-322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1010043827986<\/a><\/p>\n

Happy City Index (2024). https:\/\/happy-city-index.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Heinelt, H., Terizakis, G. (2020). Innovative cities: how to explain di\ufb00erences between cities? An answer based on an interpretive approach. Urban Research & Practice, 14(2), 1-15. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17535069.2020.1723032<\/a><\/p>\n

Keat, R. (2000). Market Boundaries and Human Goods. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 45, 23-36. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1358246100003283<\/a><\/p>\n

Kellert, S. (1997). The Value of Life. Biological Diversity and Human Society. Island Press. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. Penguin Books.<\/p>\n

Outdoor Education in the Norwegian and Dutch Curriculum Compared. https:\/\/home.uia.no\/arjenr13\/outdoor-education\/fri-109\/outdoor-education-in-the-norwe-gian-and-dutch-curriculum\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Principles of Sociological Inquiry: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. https:\/\/saylor-dotorg.github.io\/text_principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantita-tive-methods\/s09-02-conceptualization.html<\/a><\/p>\n

Sj\u00f6blom, P., Eklund, G., & Fagerlund, P. (2021). Student teachers’ views on outdoor education as a teaching method – two cases from Finland and Norway. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(4), 1-15. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14729679.2021.2011338<\/a><\/p>\n

The (Un)Happy Planet Index. The Index of Human Well-Being and Environmental Impacts (1986). NEF; FoE.<\/p>\n

The (Un)Happy Planet Index 2.0. Why good lives don’t have to cost the Earth (2007). NEF.<\/p>\n

Veenhoven, R., Diener, E., & Michalos, A. (2000). What this journal is about. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 5-8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/a:1010077309452<\/a><\/p>\n

Wilson, E. O. (1995). Naturalist. Warner Books; Island Press.<\/p>\n

World Database of Happiness. Archive of Research Findings on Subjective Enjoyment of Life. https:\/\/worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl\/search-the-database\/bibliography\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Zelenski, J. M., Nisbet, E. K. (2014). Happiness and Feeling Connected: The Distinct Role of Nature Relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 3-23. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0013916512451901<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00d6stlund, S. (2024). Well-Being Contextualism and Capabilities. Journal of Happiness Studies, 25(10). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10902-024-00718-x<\/a><\/p>\n

Essay 6<\/p>\n

Andrukh, V. S., Andrukh, V. N., Slobodian, M. V. (2016). Antonii Kempinski (Entoni, Ignaci- Tadeusz K\u0119pi\u0144ski): medychna i naukova diialnist vidomoho polskoho psykhiatra. Mizhnarodnyi zhurnal pediatrii, akusherstva ta hinekolohii, 9(1), 56-60.<\/p>\n

Viatkina, N. (2012). Priama referentsiia, deferentsiia i de re komunikatsiia. Filosofska dumka, 3, 78-85.<\/p>\n

Viatkina, N. (2019). Teoriia znachennia, deferentsiia i normatyvnist. Filosofska dumka, 5, 40-51.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15407\/fd2019.05.040<\/a><\/p>\n

Viatkina, N. (2022a). War, Massmedia and the Problems within Reference. In: A. Konverskyi et al (Eds.). The Days of Science of the Faculty of Philosophy – 2022. International Scienti\ufb01c Conference \u00abThe Days of Science of the Faculty of Philosophy – 2022\u00bb (Abstracts) (pp. 161- 167). Kyiv: Publishing center \u00abKyiv University\u00bb\/<\/p>\n

Viatkina, N. (2022b). Naukovi komunikatsii z pohliadu evoliutsii sotsiosemantychnykh merezh znan. Komunikatyvni transformatsii v suchasnii nautsi (s.117-140). Kyiv: Instytut filosofii imeni H. S. Skovorody NAN Ukrainy.<\/p>\n

Viatkina, N. (2022c). Realnist informatsiinoi zbroi. Ese. Filosofska dumka, 3, 115-118. https:\/\/dumka.philosophy.ua\/index.php\/fd\/article\/view\/622<\/a><\/p>\n

Viatkina, N. (2023). Concept of deference: semantic and pragmatic interaction. Materialy XVII Konhresu z lohiky, metodolohii, filosofii nauky i tekhnolohii (s. 528-530). Buenos-Aires. https:\/\/clmpst2023.dc.uba.ar\/pdf-sched-abstracts\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Yermolenko, V., Kebuladze, V. (2023). Navishcho nam slova?_KultPodkast. https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=u4Jjl6Ajx7g<\/a><\/p>\n

Ideolohiia i politychni perekonannia. https:\/\/www.thephilosopher1923.org\/events\/ideology-and-political-belief<\/a><\/p>\n

Kempinski, A. (2000). Shyzofrenichnyi svit. Chasopys Yi, 37(5).<\/p>\n

Liutyi, T. (2020). Vlada media. V: Kultura prynad i sprotyvu (576 s.). Kyiv: Tempora.<\/p>\n

Maliarchuk , T. (2023) \u00abMy nichoho ne znaly pro Ukrainu\u00bb: nimetski dosvidy pysmennytsi Tani Maliarchuk. https:\/\/pen.org.ua\/my-nichoho-ne-znaly-pro-ukrayinu-nimecki-dosvidy-pysmennyci-tani-malyarchuk<\/a><\/p>\n

Parkhomenko-Kutsevil, O. (2022). Problemy zabezpechennia informatsiinoi bezpeky pid chas zdiisnennia viiskovykh operatsii ta boiovykh dii. Publichne upravlinnia i administruvannia v Ukraini, 28,177-182.<\/p>\n

Popovych, M. (2016). Vidpovidalna liudyna – chy vynni obstavyny? _Buty liudynoiu (s. 225-235). Kyiv: VD \u00abKyievo-Mohylianska akademiia”\u00bb.<\/p>\n

Yankovych, N. (2023) Nina Yankovich: rosiiska informatsiina viina v Ukraini provaliuietsia. https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=1dfxXNmcI-E&list=PLteX4Oo4FBkQa3LMbShIGwG5gPPzWkNV-&index=20<\/a><\/p>\n

Abrahams, A., Lim, G. (2020). Repress\/redress: What the “war on terror can teach us about \ufb01ghting misinformation.The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 1, 3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37016\/mr-2020-032<\/a><\/p>\n

Alonso-Mart\u00edn-Romo, L., Oliveros-Mediavilla, M., Vaquerizo-Dom\u00ednguez, E. (2023). Perception and opinion of the Ukrainian population regarding information manipulation: A \ufb01eld study on disinformation in the Ukrainian war. Profesional de la informaci\u00f3n, 32(4), 320-405. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3145\/epi.2023.jul.05<\/a><\/p>\n

Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/0199276382.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Arellano, A. (2020). Mill on Deference and Democratic Character. Political Research Quarterly, 74(4), 1125-1136.<\/p>\n

Brinkmann, M. (2020). In Defence of Non-ideal Political Deference. Episteme, 19, 264-285. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/epi.2020.26<\/a><\/p>\n

De Brabanter, Ph., Leclercq, B. (2023). From Semantic Deference to Semantic Externalism to Metasemantic Disagreement. Topoi, 4, 1039-1050 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11245-023-09906-5<\/a><\/p>\n

Chang, Y., et al. (2019). The Value of Misinformation and Disinformation. arXiv, 5.<\/p>\n

Dictionary. https:\/\/www.dictionary.com\/e\/misinformation-vs-disinformation-get-informed-on-the-di\ufb00erence\/\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

Dunn, J. M. (2016). An Engeneer in Philosopher’s Clothing. Outstandin Contributions to Logic. In: K. Bimb\u00f3 (Ed.). Springer (\u0440\u0440. xvii-xxxv).<\/p>\n

Dunn, J. M. (2001). The concept of information and the development of modern logic. In: W. Stelzner and M. Stoeckler (\u0415ds). Zwischen traditioneller und moderner Logik: Nichtklassiche Ans\u00e4tze (p\u0440. 423-447).<\/p>\n

Dunn, J.M. (1966). The Algebra of Intensional Logic. Thesis. January 1996. Indiana University Bloomigton. https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/263125907_The_Al-gebra_of_Intensional_Logics.<\/a><\/p>\n

Elinson, G. (2022). The Politics of Deference. Vanderbilt Law Review. Harvard Public Law Working Paper (Vol. 75, 21-42).<\/p>\n

Floridi, L. (2015) https:\/\/\ufb01vebooks.com\/best-books\/luciano-\ufb02oridi-philosophy-inform-ation\/Interview by Nigel Warburton<\/p>\n

Hannikainen, I. R. et al. (2022). Coordination and expertise foster legal textualism. PNAS, 119(44). Princeton: Princeton University, NJ.<\/p>\n

Ikuta, J. C. (2014). Mill as Ambivalent Democrat: The Corruption and \u0421ultivation of Human Flourishing in Democratic Society and Politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 41(7),697-724. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0191453714547895<\/a><\/p>\n

Jaszczolt, K. M. (2024). Representing Discourse Meaning: Default Semantics and Functional propositions. https:\/\/sites.google.com\/view\/k-m-jaszczolt<\/a>\u00a0 https:\/\/cambridge.academia.edu\/KasiaJaszczolt<\/a><\/p>\n

Lafont, K. (2020). Democracy without Shortcuts (268 p.).Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

Lewandowsky, S. et al. (2013). Misinformation, disinformation, and violent con\ufb02ict: from Iraq and the \u00abWar on Terror\u00bb to future threats to peace. Am Psychol, 68(7), 487-501. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0034515<\/a><\/p>\n

Luhmann, N. (2000) The Reality of the Mass Media. Stanford University Press. Mahtani, A. (2017). Deference, respect and intensionality. Philos Stud, 174, 163-183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-016-0675-6<\/a><\/p>\n

Mandi\u0107, J., Klari\u0107, D. (2023). Case Study of the Russian Disinformation Campaign During the War in Ukraine. Propaganda Narratives, Goals and Impacts, 24( 2). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37458\/nstf.24.2.5<\/a><\/p>\n

Mares, E. (2024). Logic and Information. Cambridge Elements. Elements in Philosophy and Logic. Published online by Cambridge University Press https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/9781009466752<\/a> https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009466745<\/a><\/p>\n

Maricarmen, M., Sequoiah-Grayson, S. (2023). Logic and Information. In: N. Zalta-Ed- ward, U. Nodelman (\u0415ds.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/fall2023\/entries\/logic-information\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Mazepus, H., Bartusevi\u010dius, H., Leeuwen van, F., Laustsen, L., & Tollefsen, A. F. (2023). Russia’s a-acks on civilians strengthen Ukrainian resistance. PNAS Nexus, 2(12). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/pnasnexus\/pgad386<\/a><\/p>\n

Mill, J. S. (1963-1991). Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. In: J. Robson (Ed.). 33 Vols. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.<\/p>\n

Moore, A. (2012). Political Authority and Scienti\ufb01c Authority: What Does Deference Mean? SPS. Scienceconf\/3563\/_Montreal_Abstract.pdf<\/p>\n

N\u00f6th, W. (2013). Charles S. Peirce’s Theory of Information: A Theory of the Growth of Symbols and of Knowledge. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 19(1-2), 137-161.<\/p>\n

Pasitselska, \u041e. (2022). Better ask your neighbor: Renegotiating media trust during the Russian-Ukrainian con\ufb02ict. Human Communication Research, 48(2), 179-202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hcr\/hqac003<\/a><\/p>\n

Passmore, J. (1957). A Hundred Years of Philosophy. London: Cox&Wyman Ltd; , Fakenham and Reading.<\/p>\n

Peter, F. (2023a). The Grounds of Political Legitimacy (245 p.). Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

Peter, F. (2023b). 8 Political Deference. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780198872382.003.0008<\/a><\/p>\n

Peter, F. (2023c). Political Deference. Brown Bag Seminars of Political Philosophy in cooperation with Political Philosophy Seminar. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780198872382.003.0008<\/a><\/p>\n

Pocock, J. G. A. (1976). The Classical Theory of Deference. The American Historical Review, 81(3), 516-523. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/ahr\/81.3.516<\/a><\/p>\n

Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., & Abin, R. (1993). Measuring epistemic authority: Studies of politicians and professors. European Journal of Personality, 7(2), 119-138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/per.2410070204<\/a><\/p>\n

Recanati, F. (2000). Response to Wood\ufb01eld: Deferential Concepts. Mind and Language, 15,452-464. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1468-0017.00144<\/a><\/p>\n

Sam Atis (2024). https:\/\/www.samstack.io\/p\/recommendations-and-thoughts-about?-publication<\/a><\/p>\n

Saward, M. (2010). 6 Representation, legitimacy, and democracy. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199579389.003.0007.<\/a><\/p>\n

Schroeter, L., Schroeter, F. (2016). Semantic Deference Versus Semantic Coordination. American Philosophical Quaterly, 53(2).<\/p>\n

Social: Cognitive Authority. https:\/\/handwiki.org\/wiki\/Social:Cognitive_authority<\/a><\/p>\n

Sreenivasan, G. (2020). Deference and delegation: What is the di\ufb00erence? ZEMO,_3, 345-352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s42048-020-00075-3<\/a><\/p>\n

Stanley, J. (2015). How Propaganda Works. Princeton University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9781400865802<\/a><\/p>\n

Stojanovic, I., De Brabanter , Ph., Villanueva-Fernandez, N., Nicolas, D. (2005). Deferential Utterances. IJN (Institut Jean Nicod); Jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr\/ijn_00000575<\/p>\n

Sutcli\ufb00e-Braithwaite, F. (2018). Class, Politics, and the Decline of Deference in England, 1968-2000. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780198812579.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n

Thuns, A. (2020). Semantic Deference and Groundedness. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 20(3), 415-434.<\/p>\n

Wilson, P. (1983). Second-Hand Knowledge: An Inquiry Into Cognitive Authority (210 p.). Bloomsbury Academic.<\/p>\n

Williams, D. (2024). Misinformation researchers are wrong; There can’t be a science of misleading content. https:\/\/substack.com\/home\/post\/p-140174738<\/a><\/p>\n

Wood\ufb01eld, A. (2000). Reference and Deference. Mind and Language, (15), 433-451. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1468-0017.00143<\/a><\/p>\n

Essay 7<\/p>\n

Maievskyi, O. L. (2020). Funktsionalnyi uspikh intelektualnykh avtomativ. U: Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Filosofiia ta relihiieznavstvo (T. 5, s. 15-25). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18523\/2617-1678.2020.5.15-25<\/a><\/p>\n

Maievskyi, O. L. (2021). Klasternyi analiz i mekhanika dosvidu. Semiotychnyi analiz yavyshch kultury (s. 350-393). Kyiv: IF NANU. https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20220415072219<\/a> ; https:\/\/www.\ufb01losof.com.ua\/Mentaltheorie\/P8.pdf<\/p>\n

Maievskyi, O. L. (2022). Komunikatyvna ratsionalnist suchasnykh intelektualnykh avtomativ. Komunikatyvni transformatsii v suchasnii nautsi (s. 219-278). Kyiv: IF NANU. https:\/\/www.\ufb01losof.com.ua\/elektronna_biblioteka; https:\/\/drive.google.com\/\ufb01le\/d\/1QW2XpbO6oUA67TBCPB704KENEV8IKxEa<\/a><\/p>\n

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21 (pp. 610-623). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3442188.3445922<\/a><\/p>\n

Caucheteux, C., King, J.-R. (2022). Brains and algorithms partially converge in natural language processing. Communications Biology, 5(134). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s42003-022-03036-1<\/a> https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3442188.3445922<\/a><\/p>\n

Jaegle, A., Gimeno, F., Brock, A., Zisserman, A., Vinyals, O., Carreira, J. (2021). Perceiver: General Perception with Iterative A-ention. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, (139). https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2103.03206<\/a><\/p>\n

Kaelbling, L. P., Li-man, M. L., Moore, A. W. (1996). Reinforcement Learning: A Sur- vey. Journal of Arti\ufb01cial Intelligence Research, (4), 237-285. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/cs\/960510<\/a>3 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1613\/jair.301<\/a><\/p>\n

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444.<\/p>\n

Long Ouyang, Wu, J., Xu Jiang, Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Chong Zhang, Agarwal, S., Slama, K. … Lowe, R. (2022). Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. arXiv:2203.02155 (cs.CL). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2203.02155\u00a0<\/a> https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature14539<\/a><\/p>\n

McCulloch, W. S., Pi-s, W. (1943). A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5(4), 115-133. https:\/\/waldirbertazzijr.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/mcp.pdf<\/a>\u00a0 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF02478259<\/a><\/p>\n

OpenAI (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv:2303.08774 (cs.CL). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2303.08774<\/a><\/p>\n

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.1706.03762<\/a><\/p>\n

Essay 8<\/p>\n

Veil, H. (1989). Heometryia y fyzyka. V: H. Veil Matematycheskoe myshlenye (s. 194- 212). Moskva: Nauka.<\/p>\n

Hylbert, D. (1969). Matematycheskye problemy. V: P. S. Aleksandrov (Red.). Problemy Hylberta. Moskva: Nauka.<\/p>\n

Hylbert, D., Bernais, P. (1979). Osnovanyia matematyky: Lohycheskye yschyslenyia y formalyzatsyia aryfmetyky. Moskva: Nauka.<\/p>\n

Hylbert, D., Bernais, P. (1982). Osnovanyia matematyky: Teoryia dokazatelstv. Moskva: Nauka.<\/p>\n

Kokhan, Ya. (2009). Nepomichena metalohichna dystsyplina. U: Filosofski dialohy2009 (s. 325-340). Kyiv.<\/p>\n

Kokhan, Ya. (2010). Lohichna mozhlyvist yak semantychna katehoriia. Filosofska dumka, 5, 68-78.<\/p>\n

Kokhan, Ya. (2012). Intensionalni ta prahmatychni predykaty. Filosofska dumka, 2, 61-69.<\/p>\n

Kokhan, Ya. (2012a). Rozuminnia movnykh vyraziv. Filosofska dumka, 3, 55-68.<\/p>\n

Kokhan, Ya. O. (2012b). Teoretychnyi aparat lohichnoi semantyky v matematychnykh ta empirychnykh dystsyplinakh. U: M. V. Popovych (Red.). Teoriia smyslu v humanitarnykh dosli- dzhenniakh ta intensionalni modeli v tochnykh naukakh (s. 188-220). Kyiv: Nauk. dumka. Kokhan, Ya. O. (2013). Vyrazhalni mozhlyvosti formalnykh mov. Ch. 2. U Mova i kultura, 16(163), 13-21. Kyiv: VD Dmytra Buraho.<\/p>\n

Kokhan, Ya. O. (2022). Systema alternatyv yak teoretychnyi obiekt lohiky. U: Matematychna lohika ta prohramuvannia. Dosvid vykladannia (s. 83-103). Odesa: Helvetyka.<\/p>\n

Kuzhel, A. V. (1986). Matematycheskye struktury. V: A. Ya. Dorohovtsev (Red.). Matematyka sehodnia86. Nauchno-metodycheskyi sbornyk (s. 8-26). Kyev: Vyshcha shkola.<\/p>\n

Shramko, Ya. V. (2012). Istyna i khyba: mistse y rol istynnisnykh znachen u lohitsi ta filosofii. U: M. V. Popovych (Red.). Teoriia smyslu v humanitarnykh doslidzhenniakh ta intensionalni modeli v tochnykh naukakh (s. 169-187). Kyiv: Nauk. dumka.<\/p>\n

Ebbynkhaus, H.-D., Yakobs, K., Man, F.-K., Khermes, H. (1972). Mashyny Tiurynha y rekursyvnye funktsyy. Moskva: Myr.<\/p>\n

Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and Necessity. A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/meaningand-necess033225mbp\/page\/n9\/mode\/2up<\/a><\/p>\n

Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic Structures (2nd ed.). Berlin New York: Mouton de Gruyter.\u00a0 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9783110218329\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

Church, A. (1936). A Note on the Entscheidungsproblem. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1(1), 40-41.<\/p>\n

Church, A. (1941). The Calculi of Lambda-Conversion. Annals of Mathematics Studies, 6. Princeton: Princeton University Press; London: Humphrey Milford Oxford University Press (reprinted: New York: Kraus Reprint Corp., 1965).<\/p>\n

Church, A. (1956). Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Princeton; New Jersey: Princeton University Press.<\/p>\n

Frege, G. (1956). The Thought: A Logical Inquiry. Mind, New Series, 65(259), 289-311.<\/p>\n

Frege, G. (1960). Begri\ufb00sschrift. In: P. Geach, M. Black (\u0415ds.). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (p\u0440. 1-20). Oxford: Basil Blackwell\u00a0 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/65.1.289\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

Frege, G. (1960a). Function and Concept. In: P. Geach, M. Black (\u0415ds.). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (p\u0440. 21-41). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<\/p>\n

Frege, G. (1960b). Negation. In: P. Geach, M. Black (\u0415ds.). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (p\u0440. 117-135). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<\/p>\n

Frege, G. (1960c). On Concept and Object. In: P. Geach, M. Black (\u0415ds). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (p\u0440. 42-55). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<\/p>\n

Frege, G. (1960d). On Sense and Reference. In: P. Geach, M. Black (\u0415ds.). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (p\u0440. 56-78). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<\/p>\n

Frege, G. (1979). (Dialogue with Piinjer on Existence). In: G. Frege. Posthumous Writings (p. 53-67). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<\/p>\n

Frege, G. (1979a). Logic. In: G. Frege. Posthumous Writings (p\u0440. 126-151). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<\/p>\n

Frege, G. (2016). Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Derived using concept-script. (Vol.1-2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

Kleene, S. C. (1967). Mathematical Logic (p\u0440. xiii, 398). Mineola New York: Dover Publications.<\/p>\n

Kokhan, Y. (2012). Semantic presuppositions in logical syntax. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 22(1-2), 41-55.<\/p>\n

Pace, N. (2006). Time for a change. Nature, 441(289). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/441289a<\/a><\/p>\n

Popper, K. (2005). The Logic of Scienti\ufb01c Descovery (p\u0440. xxviii, 513). London; New York: Routledge Classics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/441289a<\/a><\/p>\n

Russell, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind, New Series, 14(56), 479-493. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/XIV.4.479<\/a><\/p>\n

Russell, B. (1918). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. The Monist, 28(4), 495-527. https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27900704<\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5840\/monist19182843<\/a><\/p>\n

Russell, B. (1919). On Propositions: What They are and How They Mean. Aristotelian Society Supplementary (Vol. 2 (1), \u0440\u0440.1-43). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/aristoteliansupp\/2.1.1<\/a><\/p>\n

Russell, B. (1919a). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. The Monist, 29(1), 32-63. https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27900724<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.5840\/monist191929120<\/a><\/p>\n

Russell, B. (1919b). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. The Monist, 29(2), 190-222. https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27900737<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.5840\/monist19192922<\/a><\/p>\n

Russell, B. (1956). Logical Atomism. In: B. Russell. Logic and Knowledge: Essays, 1901- 1950 (p\u0440. 321-344). New York: The Macmillan Company.<\/p>\n

Russell, B. (2010). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. (p\u0440. vii, 208). https:\/\/people.umass.edu\/~klement\/imp\/imp-ebk.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Whitehead, A. N., Russell, B. (1950). Principia Mathematica (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., p\u0440. xlvi, 674). Cambridge.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Authors: Hardashuk Tetiana Vasylivna Habovych Oleksandr Markovych Kuznetsov Volodymyr Ivanovych Omelianchyk Valentyn Yosypovych Navrotskyi Volodymyr Viacheslavovych Vasylchenko Andrii Anatoliiovych Viatkina Nataliia Borysivna Maievskyi Oleksandr Leontiiovych Kokhan Yaroslav Oleksiiovych Editor-in-Chief:\u00a0 T.V. Hardashuk, Doctor of Philosophy Reviewers: Ya.V. Liubyvyi, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor V.I. Dodonova, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor M.I. Boichenko, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor Year:\u00a02025 Pages:\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7056,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7055","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-books","category-scientific_monographs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7055","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7055"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7055\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8104,"href":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7055\/revisions\/8104"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7056"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7055"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7055"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/akademperiodyka.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7055"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}