Нариси з логіки, онтології та аксіології сучасного наукового знання

Автори:
ГАРДАШУК Тетяна Василівна
ГАБОВИЧ Олександр Маркович
КУЗНЄЦОВ Володимир Іванович
ОМЕЛЬЯНЧИК Валентин Йосипович
НАВРОЦЬКИЙ Володимир В’ячеславович
ВАСИЛЬЧЕНКО Андрій Анатолійович
ВЯТКІНА Наталія Борисівна
МАЄВСЬКИЙ Олександр Леонтійович
КОХАН Ярослав Олексійович

Відповідальний редактор: Т. В. Гардашук, доктор філософських наук

Рецензенти:
Я. В. Любивий, доктор філософських наук, професор
В. І. Додонова, доктор філософських наук, професор
М. І. Бойченко, доктор філософських наук, професор

Книга присвячена комплексному філософського аналізу ролі науки та наукових знань у розв`язанні проблем сучасності (застосування штучного інтелекту, поглиблення екологічних та економічних криз, пришвидшенням кліматичних змін,  загостренням конфліктів і  війни, у тому числі інформаційні). Автори також досліджують наукові цінності та взаємодію науки з іншими суспільними інститутами, зумовлених викликами сьогодення.
Теоретичні висновки та практичні рекомендації можуть знайти застосування у розробці теорії ухвалення рішень та моделей і алгоритмів вчасного реагування на кризові явища, зокрема, у сфері державного управління, вироблення стратегій комунікації та протидії гідридній війні, формування концептуальних засад і підходів до повоєнної відбудови України та євроінтеграції.
Книга адресована науковцям, викладачам і студентам, усім, хто цікавиться проблемами логіки, філософії та методології науки.

Література:

Нарис 1

Абакумов, В. Н., Перель, В. И., Яссиевич, И. Н. (1997). Безызлучательная рекомбинация в полупроводниках. Санкт-Петербург: Петербургский ин-т ядерной физики им. Б. П. Константинова РАН.

Аболіна, Т. (2002). Цінності моральні. Філософський енциклопедичний словник (с. 708). Київ: Абрис, Київ.

Агацци, Э. (1998). Моральное измерение науки и техники. Москва: Московский философский фонд.

Богуш, А. А. (2003). Введение в калибровочную полевую теорию электрослабых взаимодействий. Москва: Едиториал УРСС.

Богуш, А. А., Мороз, Л. Г. (2004). Введение в теорию классических полей. Москва: Едиториал УРСС.

Бургин, М., Кузнецов, В. (1988). Теоретичность, конструктивность и структурность как свойства элементов научных теорий. В: Теория, логика познания: Препринты докладов советских ученых к Восемнадцатому Всемирному. философскому. конгрессу «Философское понимание человека», 21-27 августа 1988 г. (с. 46-52). Москва: Ин-т философии АН СССР.

Бургин, М., Кузнецов, В. (1989). Ценности в структуре теоретического знания. В: Диалектика. Перестройка. Человек: Всесоюз. науч.-практ. конф., 16-19 мая 1989 г. (с. 3-5). Минск.

Бургин, М., Кузнецов, В. (1991). Аксиологические аспекты научных теорий (с. 99). Киев: Наук. думка.

Вебер, М. (1998). Про внутрішнє покликання до науки. У: Вебер, М. Соціологія. Загальноісторичні аналізи. Політика (с. 310-337). Київ: Основи.

Вітгенштайн, Л. (1995). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: Філософські дослідження. Є. Попович (Пер.). Київ: Основи.

Волькенштейн, М. (1999). Красота науки. Наука и техника. https://n-t.ru/tp/br/kn.htm

Габович, О., Кузнєцов, В. (2015a). Проблеми як внутрішні структури систем наукового знання. У: Філософські діалоги’2015. До 85-річчя академіка М. Поповича. Філософія. Культура. Суспільство (с. 132-154). Київ: Ін-т філософії імені Г. С. Сковороди.

Габович, О., Кузнєцов, В. (2015b). Щодо визначення новизни наукового знання. В: Междунар. конф. «III Весенние научные чтения», 14 марта 2015 (с. 43-47). Харьков: Научно-информационный центр «Знание».

Габович, O., Кузнєцов, В. (2016). Критика як sine qua non наукового поступу. У: Міжнар. конф. «Філософія діалогу й порозуміння в побудові європейської й світової спільнот» (с. 48-50). Львів: Львівський нац. ун-т імені Івана Франка.

Габович, О., Кузнєцов, В. (2020). Теоретична фізика. У: Велика українська енциклопедія. https://vue.gov.ua

Габович, О., Кузнєцов, В. (2021a). Матеріальність світу та поняття об’єктивності природничих наук у світлі вдосконалення технічних засобів дослідження. У: Л. Гріффен (Ред.). Матеріали 20 Всеукр. наук. конф. «Актуальні питання історії науки і техніки» (с. 43-46). Київ: Центр пам’яткознавства НАН України і УТОПІК.

Габович, О. Кузнєцов, В. (2021b). Упослідження західної науки як симптом занепаду всієї цивілізації . Sensor Electronics and Мicrosystem Technologies, 18(2), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.18524/1815-7459.2021.2.235210

Габович, О. Кузнєцов, В. (2023). Філософія наукових теорій. Нарис перший: назви та реалії. Київ: Наук. думка. https://philpapers.org/rec/KUZOGA

Габович, О. Кузнєцов, В. Семенова, Н. (2016). Українська фундаментальна наука і європейські цінності (2-ге вид., допов.). Київ: ВД «Києво-Могилянська академія». https://philpapers.org/rec/GABUFS

Галилей, Г. (1987). Пробирных дел мастер (с. 208). Москва: Наука.

Гейзенберг, В. (1987). Шаги за горизонт. Москва: Прогресс.

Гинзбург, В. Л. (2009). Об атеизме, религии и светском гуманизме (2-е изд., доп.). Москва: ФИАН.

Гольбах, П. (1987). Галерея святых. Москва: Политиздат.

Гриббин, Д., Гриббин, М. (2002). Ричард Фейнман: жизнь в науке. Москва; Ижевск: Ин-т компьютерных исследований.

Докінз, Р. (2018). Ілюзія бога. Харків: Клуб сімейного дозвілля.

Єгорченко, І. (2016). Виступ на обговоренні «Концепції розвитку Національної академії наук України на 2014-2023 роки». В: О. Габович, В. Кузнєцов, Н. Семенова. Українська фундаментальна наука і європейські цінності (2-ге вид., допов., с. 185-194). Київ: ВД «Києво-Могилянська академія». https://philpapers.org/rec/GABUFS  

Замятин, Е. (1989). Избранные произведения. Москва: Советский писатель.

Ивин, А. (2006). Аксиология. Москва: Высшая школа.

Йолон, П., Крымский, С., Парахонский, Б. (1989). Рациональность в науке и культуре. Киев: Наук. думка.

Канеман, Д. (2014). Думай медленно… решай быстро. Москва: АСТ.

Канеман, Д., Словик, П., Тверски, А. (2005). Принятие решений в неопределенности: Правила и предубеждения. Харьков: Ин-т прикладной психологии «Гуманитарный Центр».

Кацнельсон, М. (2019, Квітень 13-19). Кури не винні, або як очистити нашу науку від плагіаторів та фальсифікаторів. Дзеркало тижня. https://zn.ua/ukr/science/kuri-ne-vinni-308411.html

Киссель, М. А. (1983). Ценностей теория. В: Философский энциклопедический словарь (с. 763). Москва: Советская энциклопедия.

Косідовський, З. (1978). Біблійні оповідання. Київ: Політвидав.

Крымский, С., Кузнецов, В. (1983). Мировоззренческие категории в современном естествознании. Киев: Наук. думка.

Кузнецов, В. (1977). Философский анализ оснований физики элементарных частиц. Киев: Наук. думка.

Кузнецов, В. (1983). О теоретических критериях новизны знания в физике. В: М. Попович (Ред.). Пути формирования нового знания в современной науке (с. 121- 148). Киев: Наук. думка.

Кузнєцов, В. (2019a). Багатоваріантність розвитку систем наукового знання. В: Г. Д. Берегова (Ред). Філософські обрії сьогодення: Збірник тез VII Міжнар. науково-практ. конф. (с. 95-98). Херсон.

Кузнєцов, В. (2019b). Науково-центровані філософії як засіб подолання нігілізму щодо філософії . У: Н. Зленко, Т. Пономаренко (Ред.). Виклики ХХІ століття: наука, філософія, освіта: Матеріали Міжнар. науково-практ. конф., 21-22 листопада 2019 р. (с. 3-7). Суми: ФОП Цьома С. П.

Ламонт, К. (1984). Иллюзия бессмертия (2-е изд.). Москва: Политиздат.

Лісовий, В. (2002). Цінність. У: Філософський енциклопедичний словник (с. 707). Київ: Абрис.

Новиков, С. (2006). Вторая половина XX века и ее итог: кризис физико-математического сообщества в России и на Западе. Вестник ДВО РАН, 4 (15).

Орвелл, Дж. (2015). 1984. Буча: Вид-во Жупанського.

Пеннок, Р. (2016). Плекання культури етичної цілісності науки: правовий та ціннісний підходи. В: О. Габович, В. Кузнєцов, Н. Семенова. Українська фундаментальна наука і європейські цінності (2-ге вид., допов., с. 269-274). Київ: ВД «Києво-Могилянська академія». https://philpapers.org/rec/GABUFS

Підлісний, М., Шубін, В. (2017). Філософія цінностей. Історія і сучасність. Дніпро: Дніпропетровський держ. ун-т внутрішніх справ.

Пуанкаре, А. (1989). Ценность науки. В: А. Пуанкаре. О науке (с. 197-366). Москва: Наука.

Рассел, Б. (2004). Брак и мораль. Москва: Крафт+.

Твардовський, К. (2016). Про гідність університету. В: О. Габович, В. Кузнєцов, Н. Семенова. Українська фундаментальна наука і європейські цінності (2-ге вид., допов., с. 148-152). Київ: ВД «Києво-Могилянська академія». https://philpapers.org/rec/GABUFS

Торн, К. (2007). Черные дыры и складки времени. Дерзкое наследие Эйнштейна (с. 467- 468). Москва: Физматлит.

Університет штату Мічиган. (2016). Які цінності важливі для вченого? В: О. Габович, В. Кузнєцов, Н. Семенова. Українська фундаментальна наука і європейські цінності (2-ге вид., допов., с. 267-268). Київ: ВД «Києво-Могилянська академія».

Шохин, К. (2010). Аксиология. В Новая философская энциклопедия (Т. 1, с. 62). Москва: Мысль.

Фергюсон, Н. (2017). Цивілізація. Як Захід став успішним. Київ: Наш Формат.

ФЕС – Філософський енциклопедичний словник. (2002). (с. 14). Київ: Абрис.

Фуллер, Л. Л. (1999). Мораль права. Н. Комарова (Пер.). Київ: Сфера.

Яковенко, Н. (2007). Вступ до історії . Київ: Критика.

Abimbola, K. O. (1993). Scientific Rationality and Methodological Change: A Critical Examination of Some Recent Attempts to Naturalize Methodology. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.

Adam, B. (1998). Values in the cultural timescapes of science. Cultural Values, 2(2-3), 385-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797589809359306

Agazzi, E., Minazzi F. (Еds). (2008). Science and Ethics. The Axiological Contexts of Science. Bern; Berlin; Frankfurt am Main; New York; Oxford; Wien: Peter Lang.

Alai, M., Buzzoni, M., Tarozzi, G. (Еds). (2015). Science Between Truth and Ethical Responsibility. Evandro Agazzi in the Contemporary Scientific and Philosophical Debate. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16369-7

Alfano, M. (Еd.). (2015). Current Controversies in Virtue Theory. New York; London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315728001

Allan, L. (2016). Towards an Objective Theory of Rationality. http://www.rationalrealm.com/philosophy/epistemology/objective-theory-rationality.html   

Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science. An educational perspective. Science & Education, 8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008600230536

Allen, P., Varga, L. (2001). Complexity: the co-evolution of epistemology, axiology and ontology. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 11(1), 19-50.

Anderson, C. D. (1932). The apparent existence of easily deflectable positives. Science, 76 (1967), 238-239. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.76.1967.238

Angelou, M. (2014). Rainbow in the Cloud (р. 63). New York: Random House.

Aristotle (1998). The Metaphysics. London: Penguin Books. https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00264022

Artigas, M. (2008). Values in science. In: E. Agazzi, F. Minazzi (Еds). Science and Ethics. The Axiological Contexts of Science (рp. 115-124). Bern; Berlin; Frankfurt am Main; New York; Oxford; Wien: Peter Lang.

Audi, R. (2007). The Architecture of Reason. The Structure and Substance of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Autschbach, J. (2012). Orbitals: some fiction and some facts. J. Chem. Educ, 89(8), 1032- 1040. https://doi.org/1040.10.1021/ed200673w

Azoury, M., Kaissi, B., Attieh, L. (2018). Research Ethics. In: J. Gómez, S. Mouselli (Еds). Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment. Methodologies and Cases in Business Research (рp. 111-126). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4_7

Baehr, J. (2011). The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604074.001.0001

Baehr, J. (Еd.). (2016). Intellectual Virtues and Education. Essays in Applied Virtue Epistemology. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714127

Bahm, A. J. (Еd.). (1992). Axiology. The Science of Values. Poznan: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004463615

Başdemir, A. (2025). An Institutional Approach to Values Perspectives on Scientific Data Sharing and Reuse. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies In: partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Calgary, Alberta.

Barrotta, P. (2018). Scientists, Democracy and Society. A Community of Inquirers. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74938-9

Barrow, J. D., Tipler, F. J. (1986). The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bedau, M. (2004). A case study in objectifying values in science. In: P. Machamer, G. Wolters (Еds). Science, Values, and Objectivity (рp. 190-219). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vkg7t.14

Benedetto de, M., Luchetti, M. (2023). Specialisation by value divergence: The role of epistemic values in the branching of scientific disciplines. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2023.2233822

Benedict, B. (2001). Curiosity: A Cultural History of Early Modern Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Berg, R. (2009). Evaluating scientific theories. Philosophy Now July/August 2009. (рp. 14- 17). https://philosophynow.org/issues/74/Evaluating_Scientific_Theories

Bergan, W. (2015). Applications of group theory to fundamental particle physics. https://klixx.people.wm.edu/teaching/math300/bergan.pdf

Bergström, L. (1996). Scientific value. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 10(3), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698599608573539

Bertolotti, T. (2015). Patterns of Rationality. Recurring Inferences in Science, Social Cognition and Religious Thinking. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17786-1

Bigu, D. (2014). The place of values in scientific knowledge. Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 11(1), 193-217. https://doi.org/10.5840/cultura201411111

Billings, L. (2024). Can scientific thinking save the world? Scientific American. April. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/3-ways-scientific-thinking-could-helpsave-the-world/

Bimonte, G., Emig, T., Kardar, M., Kruger, M. (2017). Nonequilibrium fluctuational quantum electrodynamics: heat radiation, heat transfer, and force. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 8, 119-143. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys031016-025203

Bobylev, V. V., Bajkova, A. T. (2023). Review of current estimates of the Galaxy mass. Publications of the Pulkovo Observatory 228. https://doi.org/10.31725/0367-7966-2023-228-3

Bossert, W., Suzumura, K. (2010). Consistency, Choice and Rationality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjhzq9s

Boyer, T. H. (2018). Blackbody radiation in classical physics: A historical perspective. American Journal of Physics, 86(7), 495-509. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5034785

Boyer, T. H. (2019). Stochastic electrodynamics: the closest classical approximation to quantum theory. Atoms, 7(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms7010029

Boyer, T. H. (2021). Thermal radiation equilibrium: (nonrelativistic) classical mechanics versus (relativistic) classical electrodynamics. European Journal of Physics, 42(5). 055102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/abffee

Brigandt, I. (2015). Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories. Beyond inductive risk. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 45(3), 326-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2015.1079004

Bronowski, J. (1973). The principle of tolerance. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/toc/1973/12/

Brown, M. (2013). Values in science beyond underdetermination and inductive risk. Philosophy of Science 80(5), 829-839. https://doi.org/10.1086/673720

Buchanan, M. (2023). A post-particle future. Nature Physics, 19(9), 1223. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02193-2

Buchwald, J. Z., Warwick, A. (Еds). (2001). Histories of the Electron. The Birth of Microphysics. Cambridge; MA. London: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3526.001.0001

Burgin, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1987). Scientific theory and its axiology. In: J. Fenstad, I. Frolov, R. Hilpinen (Еds). Abstracts of the Eighth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. (Vol. 4 (1), рp. 116-118). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR.

Burgin, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1993a). Properties in science and their modelling. Quality and Quantity, 27, 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102499

Burgin, M., Kuznetsov, V. (1993b). The beauty measures of a scientific theory. In: R. Harre (Еd). Anglo-Ukrainian Studies in the Analysis of Scientific Discourse. Reason and Rhetoric (рp. 69-93). Lewiston; Queenstown; Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press.

Burhoe, R. (1969). Values via science. Zygon. Journal of Religion and Science, 4(1), 65-99 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1969.tb00895.x

Callebaut, W. (Ed.). (1993). Taking the Naturalistic Turn or How Real Philosophy of Science Is Done. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Carrier, M. (2013). Values and objectivity in science: Value-ladenness, pluralism and the epistemic attitude. Science & Education, 22(10), 2547-2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9481-5

Chadwick, J. (1932). Possible existence of a neutron. Nature, 129(3252), 312. https://doi.org/10.1038/129312a0

Chang, R. (2015). Value pluralism. In: J. Wright (Еd.). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 25, рp. 21-26). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.63090-8

Cheyne, C., Worrall, J. (2006). Rationality and Reality. Conversations with Alan Musgrave. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4207-8

Christophorou, L. (2018). Emerging Dynamics Science, Energy, Society and Values (рp. 97- 117). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90713-0

Condé, M. L., Salomon, M. (Еds). (2023). Handbook for the Historiography of Science. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27510-4

Crisp, R. (1998). Fact/value distinction. In: E. Craig (Еd.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Version 1.0). London and New York: Routledge.

Czeżowski, T. (2000). Knowledge, Science and Values. A Program for Scientific Philosophy. Amsterdam: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004457683

Danks, D., Ippoliti, E. (Еds). (2018). Building Theories. Heuristics and Hypotheses in Sciences. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72787-5

Daston, L., Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.

Davson-Galle, P. (2002). Science, values and objectivity. Science & Education, 11(2), 191- 202. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014412500803

Del Re, G. (2001). Ethics and science. HYLE – International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 7(2), 85-102.

Demeter, T., Murphy, K., Zittel, C. (Еds). (2015). Conflicting Values of Inquiry: Ideologies of Epistemology in Early Modern Europe. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004282551

Dirac, P. A. M. (1928). The quantum theory of the electron. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 117 (778), 610-24. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1928.0023

Dongen van, J., Paul, H. (Eds.). (2017). Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities. Сham: Sprіnger.

Doppelt, G. (2013). Values in science. In: M. Curd, S. Psillos (Еds). The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. 2nd ed., p. 346-357. London: Routledge.

Dorato, M. (2004). Epistemic and nonepistemic values in science. In: P. Machamer, G. Wolters (Еds). Science, Values, and Objectivity (рp. 52-77). Pittsburgh. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vkg7t.7

Douglas, H. (2013). The value of cognitive values. Philosophy of Science, 80(5), 796-806. https://doi.org/10.1086/673716

Dyakonov, M., Efros, A., Merkulov, I., Shklovskii, B. (2008). Vladimir Idelevich Perel. Phys. Today, 61 (7), 65-66. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2963018

Echeverría, J. (2013). Some questions from the point of view of an axiology of science. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 81(1), 311-315. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333222_034

Editorial (2018). Nobel committees must do more to achieve equality. Nature, 562(7726), 164. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06951-8

Editorial (2024). Retractions are part of science, but misconduct isn’t – lessons from a superconductivity lab. Nature, 628(8009), 689-690. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01174-6

Einstein, A., Stern, O. (1913). Einige Argumente für die Annahme einer molekularen Agitation beim absoluten Nullpunkt. Annalen der Physik, 345(3), 551-560. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19133450309

Elliott, K. (2017). A Tapestry of Values. An Introduction to Values in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190260804.001.0001

Elliott, K., McKaughan, D. (2009). How values in scientific discovery and pursuit alter theory appraisal. Philosophy of Science, 76(5), 598-611. https://doi.org/10.1086/605807

Elliott , K., McKaughan, D. (2014). Nonepistemic values and the multiple goals of science. Philosophy of Science, 81(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1086/674345

Elliott, K., Richards T. (Еds.). (2017). Exploring Inductive Risk. Case Studies of Values in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190467715.003.0013

Elliott , K., Willmes, D. D. (2013). Cognitive attitudes and values in science. Philosophy of Science, 80(5), 807-817. https://doi.org/10.1086/673719

Ellis, B. (1988). Solving the problem of induction using a values-based epistemology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39(2), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/39.2.141

Engle, E. (2008). Ontology, epistemology, axiology. Bases for a comprehensive theory of Law. Appalachian Journal of Law Winter 2008. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1268528

Fairweather, A. (Еd.). (2014). Virtue Epistemology Naturalized. Bridges Between Virtue Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04672-3

Fairweather, A., Zagzebski, L. (Eds.). (2001). Virtue Epistemology. Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195140774.001.0001

Ferguson, N. (2004). Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power. New York: Basic Books.

Ferguson, N. (2005). Colossus. The Rise and Fall of The American Empire. London: Penguin Books.

Frampton, P. H, Kim, J. E. (2020). History of Particle Theory. Between Darwin and Shakespeare. Singapore: World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/11948

Frankena, W. K. (1967). Value and valuation. http://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/value-and-valuation

Friedrich, B., Hoffmann, D., James, J. (2011). One hundred years of the Fritz Haber Institute. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 123(43), 10 022-10 049. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201104792

Gabovich, A., Kuznetsov, V. (2019, July 15th – July 19th). Towards periodizations of science in the history of science. In: F. Seroglou, V. Koulountzos (Еds.). Conference Book of Proceedings of 15th International Conference «History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching», Re-Introducing Science: Sculpting the Image of Science for Education and Media in Its Historical and Philosophical Background, Thessaloniki (рp. 585-594). Greece.

Gabovich, A., Kuznetsov, V. (2023a). Anatoly Vlasov heritage: 60-year-old controversy. European Physics Journal, 48(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/s13129-023-00051-6

Gabovich, A., Kuznetsov, V. (2023b). Scientific realism from a polysystemic view of physical theories and their functioning. Global Philosophy, 33(6), 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-023-09703-0

Galison, P. (2004). Mirror symmetry. Persons, values, and objects. In: M. Wise (Еd.). Growing Explanations: Historical Perspectives on Recent Science (рp. 23-63). Durham; London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hpm7f.4

Gapochenko, S., Khlyap, H. (2016). Aesthetic principles in the history of physics. Almagest. International Journal for the History of Scientific Ideas, 7(2), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.ALMAGEST.5.112688

Gaszczyk, G. (2023). Interrogatives, inquiries, and exam questions. Erkenntnis https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-023-00758-4

Gibney, E. (2018). Nobel committees to tackle gender skew. Nominators will be asked to consider diversity in gender. Nature, 562(7725), 19. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06879-z

Glynn, I. (2010). Elegance in Science: The Beauty of Simplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gómez, J., Mouselli, S. (Еds.). (2018). Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment. Methodologies and Cases in Business Research. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4

Gonzalez, W. (2013). Value ladenness and the value-free ideal in scientific research. In: Ch. Luetege. (Еd.). Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics (рp. 1503-1521). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_78

González, W. (2018). Economic values in the configuration of science. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 96(1), 85-112.

Gorka, S. (2018). Why We Fight: Defeating America’s Enemies. With No Apologies. New York: Regnery Publishing.

Gouttenoire, Y. (2022). Beyond the Standard Model Cocktail. Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY and Hamburg University. https://www.academia.edu/102905634/
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11862-3

Guillán, A. (2017). Axiological elements of scientific prediction. In: A. Guillán. Pragmatic Idealism and Scientific Prediction (рр. 251-284). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63043-4_8

Gutzwiller, M. G. (1998). Moon-Earth-Sun: The oldest three-body problem. Rev. Mod. Phys, 70,(2), 589-639. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.589

Haddock, A., Millar, A., Pritchard, D. (Еds.). (2009). Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231188.001.0001

Hargittai, I. (2011). Drive and Curiosity. What Fuels the Passion for Science. New York: Prometheus Books.

Hauser, M. (2006). Moral Minds. How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York: Harper Collins.

Henning, T., Schweikard, D. (Еds.). (2013). Knowledge, Virtue, and Action. Putting Epistemic Virtues to Work. New York and London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203098486

Hensel, W., Miłkowski, M., Nowakowski, P. (2022). Without more theory, psychology will be a headless rider. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45(20). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21000212

Hicks, D., Stapleford, Th. (2016). The virtues of scientific practice: MacIntyre, virtue ethics, and the historiography of science. ISIS. A Journal of the History of Science, 107(3), 449-72. https://doi.org/10.1086/688346

Hoeckley, C. (1998). Good Science: Ethical, Prudential and Aesthetic Factors in Accepting Scientific Hypotheses. Dissertation. The Claremont Graduate University.

Hookway, C. (1994). Cognitive virtues and epistemic evaluations. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559408570791

Ioannidis, J. P. A., Klavans, R., Boyack, K. W. (2018). Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days. Nature, 561(7722), 167-169. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06185-8

Ivanova, M. (2017a). Aesthetics in science. Philosophy Compass, 12(10), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12433

Ivanova, M. (2017b). Poincaré’s aesthetics of science. Synthese, 194(7), 2581-2594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1069-1

Jankowska, M., Martynoga, M. (2016). A few words on ethics of scientific research. World Scientific News, 57, 324-331.

Jenkins, Z. (2003). Do you need to believe in orbitals to use them?: Realism and the autonomy of chemistry. Philosophy of Science 70(5), 1052-1062. https://doi.org/10.1086/377388

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A. (1982). (Еds.). Judgment Under Uncertainty. Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477

Karp, M. (2023). George Orwell and Russia. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781788317160

Karstens, B. (2017). «The lonely form dies»: how epistemic virtues connect Roman Jakobson’s New Science of language and his personality. In: J. van Dongen, H. Paul. (Еds.). Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities (рp. 149-171). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48893-6_10

Keas, M. N. (2018). Systematizing the theoretical virtues. Synthese, 195, 2761-2793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1355-6

Kennedy, D. (1997). Academic Duty. London: Harvard University Press.

Kincaid, H., Dupré, J., Wylie, A. (2007). Value-Free Science. Ideals and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308969.001.0001

King, J., McLure, M. (2015). Value. History of the concept. In: J. Wright (Еd.). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 25, рp. 7-13). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03123-8

Kirchin, S. (2018). Thick Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803430.001.0001

Koepsell, D. (2017). Scientific Integrity and Research Ethics. An Approach from the Ethos of Science. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51277-8

Koertge, N. (2005a). A Bouquet of Scientific Values. In: N. Koertge. (Еd.). Scientific Values and Civic Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195172256.001.0001

Koertge, N. (Еd.). (2005b). Scientific Values and Civic Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195172256.001.0001

Kuhn, T. (1977), Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In: T. Kuhn. The Essentialension (рp. 320-333). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kuznetsov, V. (2021), Modified structure-nominative reconstruction of practical physical theories as a frame for the philosophy of physics. Епістемологічні дослідження в філософії, соціальних і політичних науках, 4(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.15421/342103

Labarca, M., Lombardi, O. (2010). Why orbitals do not exist? Found. Chem, 12(2), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-010-9086-53

Laudan, L. (1984a). Pseudo-science of science. In: J. R. Brown. (Еd.). Scientific Rationality. The Sociological Turn. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands (рp. 41-74). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7688-8_2

Laudan, L. (1984b). Science and Values. The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lawrence, P. (2008). Lost in publication. How measurement harms science. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 9-11. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00079

Levin, M. L., Rytov, S. M. (1967). Theory of Equilibrium Thermal Fluctuations in Electrodynamics. Moscow: Nauka.

Longino, H. E. (1996). Cognitive and non-cognitive values in science: Rethinking the dichotomy. In: L. H. Nelson, J. Nelson (Еds.). Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science (рp. 39-58). Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_3

Longino, H. E. (2004). How values can be good for science. In: P. Machamer, G. Wolters (Еds.). Science, Values, and Objectivity (рp. 127-142). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vkg7t.11

Lunteren van, F. H., Hollestelle, M. J. (2013). Paul Ehrenfest and the dilemmas of modernity. Isis. A Journal of the History of Science, 104(3), 504-536. https://doi.org/10.1086/673271

MacDonald, H. (2018). The Diversity Delusion. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Machamer, P., Wolters, G. (Еds.). (2004). Science, Values, and Objectivity. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vkg7t

MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue (3rd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Magnani, L. (2007). Morality in a Technological World. Knowledge as Duty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498657

Marcus, A. (2018). A scientist’s fraudulent studies put patients at risk. Science, 362(6413), 394. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.362.6413.394-a

Marshall, T. W. (1963). Random electrodynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 276(1367), 475-491. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1963.0220

Martinson, B., Anderson, M., Vries de, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737-738. https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a

Marx, W. (2014). The Shockley-Queisser paper – A notable example of a scientific sleeping beauty. Ann. Phys. 526, 5-6: A41-A45. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.20140080

Marx, W., Cardona, M. (2004). Blasts from the past. Phys. World, 17(2), 14-15. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/17/2/21

McCook, A. (2018a). Fallout for co-authors. Science, 362(6413), 394-395. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.362.6413.394-b

McCook, A. (2018b). One publisher, more than 7000 retractions. Science, 362(6413), 393. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.362.6413.393

Meis, C. (2017). Light and Vacuum. The Wave Particle Nature of the Light and the Quantum Vacuum. Electromagnetic Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics Beyond the Standard Model (2nd ed.). Singapore: World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/10450

Mele, A., Piers, R. (2004) (Еds.). The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199752393.001.0001

Melo-Martín de, I., Intemann, K. (2012). Interpreting evidence. Why values can matter as much as science. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 55(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2012.0007

Melville, W., Campbell, T., Jones, D. (2019). Axiology, the subject and the chair. Research in Science Education, 49, 679-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9646-y

Menapace, M. (2018). Scientific ethics. A new approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(101),1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0050-4

Minazzi, F. (2008). The axiological dimension of science. In: E. Agazzi, F. Minazzi (Еds.). Science and Ethics. The Axiological Contexts of Science (рp. 83-100). Bern; Berlin; Frankfurt am Main; New York; Oxford; Wien: Peter Lang.

Montano, U. (2013). Beauty in science: A new model of the role of aesthetic evaluations in science. Eur. J. Phil. Sci., 3(2), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-013-0064-3

Myrvold, W. C. (2012). Epistemic values and the value of learning. Synthese, 187(2), 547- 568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9860-x

Newman, J. H. (1990). The Idea of a University. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Noether, E. (1918). Invariante Variationsprobleme. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (р. 235-257). Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse.

Nozick, R. (1993). The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820832

Nuzzo, R. (2015). How scientists fool themselves – and how they can stop. Nature, 526(7572), 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1038/526182a

O’Loughlin, I., VcCallum, K. (2018). The aesthetics of theory selection and the logics of art. Philosophy of Science, 86(2), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1086/701953

Olson, J. (2005). Axiological Investigations. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

Orwell, G. (2013). The Complete Works. Delphi Classics.

Pais, A. (1979). Einstein and the quantum theory. Rev. Mod. Phys., 51(4), 863-914. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.51.863

Paul de, M., Zagzebski, L. (Еds.). (2003). Intellectual Virtue. Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Peels, R. (2018). Epistemic values in the humanities and in the sciences. History of Humanities, 3(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.1086/696304

Peña de la, L., Ce-o, A. M. (1996). The Quantum Dice. An Introduction to Stochastic Electrodynamics. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8723-5

Peña de la, L., Ce-o, A. M., Valdés-Hernández, A. (2015). The Emerging Quantum. The Physics Behind Quantum Mechanics. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07893-9

Plait, P. (2023). How seeing the Мilky way helped us discover the whole Universe. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-seeing-the-milky-way-helped-us-discover-the-whole-universe/

Priest, S., Goodwin, J., Dahlstrom, M. F. (Еds.). (2018). Ethics and Practice in Science Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226497952.001.0001

Purdy, R. (2023). Particle Physics. An Introduction (2nd ed.). Dulles; Boston; New Delhi: Mercury Learning and Information. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781683928768

Radder, H. (Еd.). (2010). The Commodification of Academic Research. Science and the Modern University. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Regt de, H. W. (2020). Understanding, values, and the aims of science. Philosophy of Sci- ence, 87(5), 921-932. https://doi.org/10.1086/710520

Resnik, D. (1988). The Ethics of Science. An Introduction. London and New York Routledge.

Richter, B. (2006). Theory in particle physics: Theological speculation versus practical knowledge. Physics Today, 59(10), 8-9. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2387062

Roberts, B., Wood, W. (2007). Intellectual Virtues. An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283675.001.0001

Roberts, P. (2011). Putting knowledge in its place. Virtue, value, and the internalism/externalism debate. Philosophical Studies, 159(2), 241-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9700-y

Roman, P. (1961). Theory of Elementary Particles (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Romero, G. (2018). Outline of a theory of scientific aesthetic. Foundations of Science, 23(4), 795-807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-018-9551-5

Rooney, P. (1992). On Values in Science: Is the Epistemic/Non-Epistemic Distinction Useful? PSA. Contributed Papers, 1, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbien-meetp.1992.1.192740

Rosenblum, B., Ku-ner, F. (2006). Quantum Enigma. Physics Encounters Consciousness (р. 6). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195175592.001.0001

Ross, A. (Ed.). (1996). Science Wars. Duke University Press Durham and London. Roy, A. E. (2004). Orbital motion (4th ed.). Rota Bacon: CRC Press.

Roychoudhuri, C., Kracklauer, A. F., Creath, K. (2008). The Nature of Light. What Is a Photon? Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Ryan, S. (2003). Objectivism and the Corruption of Rationality. A Critique of Ayn Rand’s Epistemology. New York: Writers Club Press.

Sante di, D. et al. (2023). Flat band separation and robust spin Berry curvature in bilayer kagome metals. Nature Physics, 19(8), 1135-1142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02053-z

Sarkar, H. (2007). Group Rationality in Scientific Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498565

Sayer, A. (2011). Why Things Matter to People. Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511734779

Scerri, E. R. (2000). Have orbitals really been observed? J. Chem. Educ., 77(11), 1492-1494. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p1492

Scerri, E. R. (2001). The recently claimed observation of atomic orbitals and some related philosophical issues. Philosophy of Science, 68(S3), S76-S88. https://doi.org/10.1086/392899

Schindler, S. (2018). Theoretical Virtues in Science. Uncovering Reality Through Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108381352

Schweber, S. (2000). In the Shadow of the Bomb: Oppenheimer, Bethe, and the Moral Responsibility of the Scientist. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1292484

Šešelja, D., Kosolosky, L., Straßer, Ch. (2012). The rationality of scientific reasoning in the context of pursuit: drawing appropriate disctinctions. Philosophica, 86, 51-82. https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82146

Shanin, A. (2016). A critical axiology for big data studies. Palabra Clave, 19(4), 972-996. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2016.19.4.2

Shapin, S. (2008). The Scientific Life. A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226750170.001.0001

Sharma, D., Singh, V., Tripathi, A., Mahapatra, P. (2022). History of the standard model in particle physics. https://evincism.com/history-development-of-particle-phys-ics-and-the-standard-model/

Shrader-Frechette, K. (2008). Ideological toxicology. Invalid logic, science, ethics about low-dose pollution. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 27, 647-657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327108098491

Smith, B., Thomas, A. (1998). Axiology. In: E. Craig (Еd.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philos- ophy, Version 1.0. London; New York: Routledge.

Snider, E., Dasenbrock-Gammon, N., McBride, R., Debessai, M., Vindana, H., Vencatasamy, K, Lawler, K. V., Salamat, A., Dias, R. P. (2022). Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride. Nature, 586(7829), 373-377. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2801-z

Sokal, A., Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable Nonsense. Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. New York: Picador. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.882506

Spohn, W. (2002). The many facets of the theory of rationality. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 2(6), 249-264.

Spohn, W. (2004). On the objectivity of facts, beliefs, and values. In: P. Machamer, G. Wolters (Еds.). Science, Values, and Objectivity (рp. 172-189). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vkg7t.13

Spratt, E.L., Elgammal, A. (2015). Computational Beauty: Aesthetic Judgment at the Inter- section of Art and Science (pp. 35-53). In: Agapito, L., Bronstein, M., Rother, C. (Eds.). Computer Vision – ECCV 2014 Workshops. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8925. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16178-5_3

Standard Model (2023). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

Stump, D. (2007). Pierre Duhem’s virtue epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, A 38(1), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.010

The Standard Model (2023). https://home.cern/science/physics/standard-model Thomas, A. (1998). Values. In: E. Craig (Еd.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Version 1.0. London; New York: Routledge.

Università di Bologna (2023). Quantum materials: Electron spin measured for the first time by Università di Bologna. https://phys.org/news/2023-06-quantum-materi-als-electron.html

Vecchia di, P. (2008). The birth of string theory. In: M. Gasperini, J. Maharana (Еds.). String Theory and Fundamental Interactions. Gabriele Veneziano and Theoretical Physics: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Lecture Notes in Physics (рp. 59-118). Berlin: Springer.

Weingart, P. (2004). Between Science and Values. In: P. Machamer, G. Wolters (Еds.). Science, Values, and Objectivity (рp. 112-126). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vkg7t.10

Weirich, P. (2009). Collective Rationality. Equilibrium in Cooperative Games. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195145397.003.0020

Wells, J. D. (2020). Discovery Beyond the Standard Model of Elementary Particle Physics. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38204-9

Wheeler, J. (1954). Letter to John von Neumann. Цит. за: Rickles, D. Geon Wheeler: from nuclear to spacetime physicist. EPJ H, Vol. 43, 243-265 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2018-80053-x

Wilczek, F. (2015). A Beautiful Question. Finding Nature’s Deep Design. New York: Penguin Press

Williams, P. (2023). Philosophy of Particle Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009205382

Wüthrich, A. (2010). The Genesis of Feynman Diagrams. Dordrecht: Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9228-1

Yang, Seolmin, Youn, Hyejin (2023). Capturing Values at the Boundaries. arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16360

Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the Mind. An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174763

Zahar, P., Bartle-, S. (2002). Basic emotions and their biological substrates: A nominalistic interpretation. Consciousness & Emotion, 2(2), 189-221. https://doi.org/10.1075/ce.2.2.02zac

Zenker, F. Gärdenfors, P. (2014, 27-28 March). Communication, Rationality, and Conceptual Changes in Scientific Theories: Meeting of the Nordic Network for Philosophy of Science. Lund, Sweden). http://philsci-archive.pi-.edu/10367/

Нарис 2

Омельянчик, В. (1989). Мир, структура, возможность. В: М. Попович (Ред.). Структура і смисл. Київ.

Aharonov, Y., Anandan, J., Vaidman, L. (1993). Meaning of the wave function. Physical Review, 47(6). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.4616

Alter, O., Yamamoto, Y. (2001). Quantum measurement of a single system. New York: JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527617128

James, R. (2020, April) Beebe and Finnur Dellsén, Scientific Realism in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Seven Sciencesand History and Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science, 87, 336-364. https://doi.org/10.1086/707552

Bhaskar, R. (1975). Realist Theory of Science

Bhaskar, R. (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism. A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences.

Bohm, D., Hiley, B. (1995). The Undivided University: an ontological interpretation of quantum theory. Rougtlage: NY-L.

Brading, K. (2011). Structuralist Approaches to Physics: Objects, Models and Modality. Іn: M. Massimi, A. Bokulich, P. Bokulich (Еds.) Scientific Structuralism. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9597-8_3

Bush, J. W. M. (2015). The new wave of pilot-wave theory. Physics Today, 68(8), 47. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.2882

Bush, J., Oza, A. (2021). Hydrodynamic quantum analogs. Rep. Prog. Phys, 84. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/abc22c

Carnap, R. (1991). Logical Foundations of the Unity of Science. In: R. Boyd, P. Gasper, J. D. Trout (Еds.). The philosophy of science. Massachusetts: The MIT Press Cambridge.

Cartwright, N. (1999). Models and the limits of theory: quantum Hamiltonians and the BCS model of superconductivity. Іn: Models as mediators. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660108.010

Cartwright, N. (2000). The Dappled World. A Study of the Boundaries of Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167093

Cartwright, N. (2010). Models: Parables v Fables Roman. Іn: F. Ma-hew, C. Hunter. Mimesis аnd Convention. Representation. Art аnd Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3851-7_2

Chattaraj, P. (Еd.) (2010). Quantum Trajectories. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

Couder, Y., Protière, S., Fort, E., & Oudaoud, A. (2005). Dynamical phenomena: walking and orbiting droplets. Nature, 437(208). https://doi.org/10.1038/437208a

Devitt, M. (1994). Realism and Truth, Princeton (2ed ed.). NJ: Princeton University Press.

Devitt, M. (1999). A naturalistic defense of realism. In: S. D. Hales (Ed.). Metaphysics: Contemporary readings (pp. 90-103). Belmont; CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Devitt, M. (2010). Putting Metaphysics First. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280803.001.0001

Devitt, M. (2017). Naturalistic Defence of Realism. In: The Problem of Realism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315185507-2

Devitt, M. (2020). An Ignored Argument for Scientific Realism, Filozofia Nauki (The Philosophy of Science) (Vol. 28(2), рр. 5-24). https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2020.0007

Dummett, M. (1978). Truth and Other Enigmas. Cambridge; MA: Harvard University Press.

Dümont, J. (1999). Putnam’s Model-Theoretic Argument(s). A Detailed Reconstruction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 30, 341-364. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008369914990

Elder-Vass, D. (2005). Emergence and the Realist Account of Cause. Journal of Critical Realism, 4(2), 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1558/jocr.v4i2.315

English, J. (1973). Underdetermination: Craig and Ramsey. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(14), 453-462. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025109

Esfeld, M. (2015). Review of (Steven French, 2014). Mind,124(493), 334-338. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzu191

Fraassen van, B. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198244274.001.0001

Fraassen van, B. (1989). Laws and Symmetry. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198248601.001.0001

Fraassen van, B. (1994). Gideon Rosen оn Constructive Empiricism. Philosophical Studies, 74(2).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989802

French, S., Ladyman, J. (2003, Jul.). Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics аnd The Metaphysics оf Structure. Synthese, 136(1), 31-56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024156116636

French S., Ladyman J. (2011). In Defence of Ontic Structural Realism. Іn: M. Massimi, Bokulich, P. Bokulich (Еds.) Scientific Structuralism. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9597-8_2

French, S. (2014). The Structure of the World. Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford UP https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684847.001.0001

Giere, R. (2008). Why Scientific Models Should Not Be Regarded as Works of Fiction. Іn: M. Suárez (Еd.). Fictions in science: philosophical essays on modeling and idealization. Routledge.

Giere, R. (2010). Explaining Science. A Cognitive Approach.

Gifford, M. (2019). Reconsidering Devitt on Realism and Truth. Erkenntinis, 86(6), 1367-1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00158-7

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2006). The strategy of model-based science. Biological Philosophy, 21, 725-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9054-6

Gonzalez, M. F., Gimenez, X., Gonzalez-Aguilar, J., Bofill, J. M. (2007). Quantum Trajectories from a Discrete-Variable Representation Method. J. Phys. Chem. A, 111, 10226-10233. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp072237o

Grover, M. (1962). The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities. In: Feigl, G. Maxwell (Еd.). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 3, рр. 3-27). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Gutzwiller, М. (1990). Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics. NY: Springer Vg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0983-6

Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814563

Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? (pp. X-261). Harvard University Press.

Hacking, I. (2004). Historical Ontology. Harvard University Press.

Harré, R., Madden, E. H. (1975). Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Harré, R., Secord, P. F. (1972). The Explanation of Social Behaviour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Humphrey, P. (Еd.) (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199368815.001.0001

Joasa, C., Lehnera, C., (2009, June 16). The classical roots of wave mechanics: Schrodinger’s transformations of the optical-mechanical analogy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.06.007

Kaidesoja, T. (2005). The Trouble with Trancendental Arguments: Towards a Naturalization of Roy Bhaskar’s Early Realist Ontology. Journal of Critical Realism, 4(1), 28-61. https://doi.org/10.1558/jocr.v4i1.28

Kaidesoja, T. (2007,·March). Exploring the Concept of Causal Power in a Critical Realist Tradition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00324.x

Karitzis, A. (2011, May). On Devitt’s Defence of Realism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 42(1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-011-9144-2

Kemp, G., Lugg, A. (2020). Quine on Ontology: Chapter 7 of Word and Object. In: F. Jans-sen-Lauret (Ed.). Quine, Structure, and Ontology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198864288.003.0009

Kukla, A. (1998). Studies in Scientific Realism (р. 90). Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195118650.001.0001

Kusch, M. (2002). Metaphysical déjà vu: Hacking and Latour on science studies and metaphysics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 639-647 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00037-1

Kusch, M. (2010). Hacking’s historical epistemology: a critique of styles of reasoning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41, 158-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.03.007

Ladyman, J. (1998). What is Structural Realism? Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci., 29(3), 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(98)80129-5

Ladyman, J. (2000, Dec.). What’s Really Wrong with Constructive Empiricism? Van Fraassen and the Metaphysics of Modality. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51(4), 837-856. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/51.4.837

Leifer, S. (2014). Is the Quantum State Real? An Extended Review of ψ-ontology Theorems. Quanta, 3(1), 67-155. https://doi.org/10.12743/quanta.v3i1.22

Martínez Rodríguez, M.-L. (2021). Texture in the Work of Ian Hacking. Michel Foucault as the Guiding Thread of Hacking’s Thinking. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64785-8

Massimi, M. (2008, Oct.). Why There are No Ready-Made Phenomena: What Philosophers of Science Should Learn From Kant, (Vol. 63, рр. 1-35). Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246108000027

Massimi, M. (2011). Structural Realism: A Neo-Kantian Perspective. Іn: M. Massimi, A. Bokulich, P. Bokulich (Еds.). Scientific Structuralism (1-25). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9597-8_1

Massimi, M. (2018). Perspectival modeling. Philosophy of Science, 85(3), 335-359. Massimi, M., Bokulich, A., Bokulich, P. (Еds.) (2011). Scientific Structuralism. https://doi.org/10.1086/697745

Mcarthur, D. (2006, Jul.). Contra Cartwright: Structural Realism, Ontological Pluralism And Fundamentalism About Laws. Synthese, 151(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-5406-4

McCall, S. (2003, Jan.). Review «The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, by Nancy Cartwright». Mind, New Series, 112(445), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/112.445.99

Morgan, M. S., Morrison, M. (Еds.) (1999). Models as mediators. Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660108

Morrison M., Morgan, M.-S. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. Іn Models as mediators. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660108.003

Nussinov, S. (1998). Realistic Experiments for Measuring the Wave Function of a Single. Particle, Foundations of Physics, 28 (6), 865-880. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018891028578

Omel’yanchyk, V. (1991). Soviet philosophy. Іn: H. Burkhardt, B. Smith (Еds.). Handbook in Metaphysics and Ontology (Vol. 2, pp. 848-850). Munchen.

Penrose, R. (1989). The emperor’s new mind. Oxford Un. Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198519737.001.0001

Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625398

Putnam H. (1994). Sense, Nonsense, and the Senses: An Inquiry into the Powers of the Human Mind. The Journal of Philosophy, 91(9), 445-517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2940978

Quine, W., Goodman, N. (1947). Steps Toward a Constructive Nominalism. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 13(1), 49-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/2267526

Quine, W. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia UP. https://doi.org/10.7312/quin92204

Rebufello, E., Piacentini, F., Avella, A., Lussana, R., et al. (2021). Protective Measurement – A New Quantum Measurement Paradigm: Detailed Description of the First Realization. Appl. Sci., 11, 42-60. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094260

Resnik, M. (2020). Quine’s non-ontological structuralism (and mine). Іn: F. Janssen-Lau- rent (Еd.). Qunie, Structure and Ontology (рр. 7-26). Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198864288.003.0002

Rochefort, P.-Y. (2021). Did Putnam Really Abandon Internal Realism in the 1990s? European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.2515

Ronald, N. (1985). Giere Constructive Realism. Іn Imagies of Sciences (рр. 75-98).

Ronald, N. (2006). Giere – Scientific Perspectivism.

Rosen, G. (1994). What is Constructive Empiricism? Philosophical Studies, 74, 143-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989801

Rouse, J. (1998). New Philosophies of Science in North America – Twenty Years Later. Journal for General Philosophy of Sciences, 29, 71-122. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008259514953

Samir, O. (2016). Philosophy of Science – A Very Short Introduction.

Sarkar, S., Pfeifer, J. (Еds.) (2005). Philosophy of Science – An Encyclopedia.

Sankey, H. (2018). Putnam’s Internal Realism in Retrospect. Analisis. Revista de investigation Filosofica, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_arif/a.rif.201812921

Simchen, O., Putnam, H. (2005). The philosophy of science: an encyclopedia (р. 623).

Tumulka, R. (2019). Bohmian Mechanics. https://arxiv.org/abs/71080.4071

Winsberg, E. (2003). Simulated experiments: Methodology for a virtual world. Philosophy of Science, 70, 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1086/367872

Worrell, J. (1989). Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds? Dialectica, 43, 99-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x

Нарис 3

Ушкалов, Л. (Ред.). (2011). Сковорода Г. Повна академічна збірка творів. Харків; Ед- монтон; Торонто: Майдан: Вид-во Канадського інституту українських студій.

Ainslie, G. (2008). Breakdown of Will. In: J. Adler, L. Rips (Eds.). Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and Its Foundations (рр. 156-186). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814273.010

Barbalet, J. M. (2004). Emotion, Social Theory, and Social Structure: A Macrosociological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2003). Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks. J. Logic Computat, 13(3), 429-448. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/13.3.429

Brandolini, Silva Marzetti Dall’Aste (2011). Moral Good and Right Conduct. In: Silva Marzetti Dall’Aste Brandolini, R. Scazzieri (Eds.). Fundamental Uncertainty. Rationality and Plausible Reasoning (рр. 294-330). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305687_12

Camus, A. (1955). The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. London: Hamish Hamilton. Doyle, J., Thomason, R. H. (1999). Background to Qualitative Decision Theory. AI Magazine,  55 (68).

Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77, 321-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

Hage, J. (2005). Studies in Legal Logic. Dordrecht: Springer.

Dhami, S., Аl-Nowaihi, A. (2021) Rationality in Economics: Theory and Evidence. In: M. Knauff, W. Spohn (Eds.). The Handbook of Rationality (рр. 565-576). Cambridge; Massachusetts; London: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11252.003.0059

Gordon, T. F. (2018). Defining Argument Weighing Functions. IFCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 5(3), 747-773.

Lorini, E. (2017). Logics for Games, Emotions and Institutions. IFCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 4(9), 3075-3113.

Miyata, M., Omori, T. (2018). Modeling emotion and inference as a value calculation system. Procedia Computer Science, 123, 295-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.046

Modgil, S., Prakken, H. (2017). Abstract Rule-Based Argumentation. IFCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 4(8), 2319-2406.

Perea, A. (2021). Epistemic Game Theory. In: M. Knauff, W. Spohn (Eds.). The Handbook of Rationality (рр. 543-551). Cambridge; Massachuse-s; London: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11252.003.0057

Plantin, C. (2004). On the inseparability of emotion and reason in argumentation. In:  E. Weigand (Ed.). Emotions in dialogic interactions (рр. 265-275). Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.248.18pla 

Pollock, J. L. (1995). Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. Cambridge; Massachusetts; London: A Bradford Book; The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1887.001.0001

Pollock, J. L. (2006). Thinking about Acting. Logical Foundations for Rational Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304817.001.0001

Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G. (2002). Logics for Defeasible Argumentation. In: D. Gabbay, F. Guenthner (Еds.). Handbook of Philosophical Logic (Vol. 4, 2nd ed., 219-318). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_3 

Prakken, H. (2017). Historical Overview of Formal Argumentation. IFCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 4(8), 2183-2262.

Smith, C. A., Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Emotion and Adaptation, In: L. A. Pervin (Ed.). Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (рр. 609-637). New York: Guilford.

Sousa de, R. (2008). Logic and Biology: Emotional Inference and Emotions in Reasoning. Іn: J. Adler, L. Rips (Еd.). Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and Its Foundations (рр. 1002-1015). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814273.053

Weide van der, T. L. (2011). Arguing to Motivate Decisions. SIKS Dissertation Series, 33. Printed by Wőhrmann Print Service.

Weide van der, T. L., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J. Ch., Prakken, H., and Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (2009, May 12). Practical Reasoning Using Values: Giving Meaning to Values. Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems: 6th International Workshop, ArgMAS 2009 (Vol. 6, рр. 79-93). Budapest: Revised Selected and Invited Papers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_5

Нарис 4

Arieti, S. (1955). Some aspects of language in schizophrenia. In: H. Werner (Еd.). On Ex- pressive Language: Papers Presented at the Clark University Conference on Expres- sive Language Behavior (рр. 53-67). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/411370

Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity. The Magic Synthesis. New York: Basic Books.

Arieti, S. (1978). From primary process to creativity. J Creat, 12(4), 225-246. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1978.tb00171.x

Auchincloss, E. L., Samberg, E. (Еds.). (2012). Psychoanalytic Terms and Concepts. Lon- don: Yale University Press.

Battilotti, G. (2014). Symmetry vs. Duality in Logic: An Interpretation of Bi-Logic to Model Cognitive Processes Beyond Inference. Int J Cognit Informat Nat Intell, 8(4), 83-97 https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcini.2014100105

Battilotti, G., Borozan M., and Lauro Grotto, R. (2023). The Modal Components of Judgements in a Quantum Model of Psychoanalytic Theory. Entropy, 25, р. 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25071057

Bazan, A., Kim Van, D., Kock de, L., Brakel, L. A. W., Geerardyn, F., and Shevrin, H. (2013). Empirical evidence for Freud’s theory of primary process mentation in acute psycho- sis. Psychoanal Psychol, 30, 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027139

Bell, D. (2017). Unconscious phantasy: Some historical and conceptual dimensions. Int J Psychoanal, 98(3), 785-798. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12586

Boag, S. (2014). Ego, drives, and the dynamics of internal objects. Frontiers in Psychoanalysis and Neuropsychoanalysis, 5, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00666

Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child’s tie to his mother. Int J Psycho-Anal, 39, 350-373.

Brakel, L. A. W. (2009). Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, and the a-Rational Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199551255.001.0001

Brakel, L. A. W. (2015). Two fundamental problems for philosophical psychoanalysis. In: S. Boag, L. A. W. Brakel, L. Talvitie. Philosophy, Science, and Psychoanalysis. A Critical Meeting. London: Karnac Books (pp. 119-143). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429478277-6

Brakel, L. A. W. (2018). The Primary Process: Bridges to Interdisciplinary Studies of Mind. Psychoanal Inq, 38(3), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2018.1430964

Breuer, J., Freud, S. (1953 (1895)). Studies on Hysteria (SE, 2, рр. 1-335).

Brodie, B. (2020). Object Relations and Intersubjective Theories in the Practice of Psychotherapy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855697

Chambers, J. (2017). The Neurobiology of Attachment: From Infancy to Clinical Outcomes. Psychodyn Psychiatry, 45(4), 542-563. https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2017.45.4.542

Domarus von, E. (1944). The specific laws of logic in schizophrenia. In: J. S. Kasanin (Еd.).

Language and thought in schizophrenia: collected papers. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1994 (1943)). Phantasy and Inner Reality. In: D. E. Scharff, E. F. Birtles (Еd.). From Instinct to Self (Vol. 2, рр. 557-560). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1944). Endopsychic structure considered in terms of object-relation- ships. The Int J Psychoanal, 25, 70-93.

Freud, S. (1953 (1899)). The Interpretation of Dreams. In: S. Freud. SE IV-V (ix-627). Freud, S. (1957 (1915)). The Unconscious. In: S. Freud. SE XIV (159-190).

Greenberg, J., Mitchell, S. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Boston: Har- vard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjk2xv6

Grotstein, J. S. (1997). ‘Internal objects’ or ‘chimerical monsters’?: the demonic ‘third forms’ of the internal world. J Anal Psychol, 42(1), 47-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1997.00047.x

Hensel, B. F. (2014). On the origin of internal objects in the works of Fairbairn and Klein and the possible therapeutic consequences. In: G. S. Clarke, D. E. Scharff (Еds.). Fairbairn and the Object Relations Tradition (147-160). London: Karnac. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429474538-13

Holmes, J., Slade, A. (2019). The neuroscience of attachment: implications for psychological therapies. Br J Psychiatry, 214(6), 318-319. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.7

Isaacs, S. (1948). The nature and function of phantasy. Int J Psychoanal, 2, 73-97.

Iurato, G. (2018). Computational Psychoanalysis and Formal Bi-Logic Frameworks. Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4128-8

Kernberg, O. (1976). Object-relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. New York: Jason Aronson.

Khrennikov, A. (2002). Classical and Quantum Mental Models and Freud’s Theory of Unconscious/Conscious Mind. Växjö: Växjö University Press.

Klein, M. (1984). Love, Guilt and Reparation and Other Works 1921-1945. London: Virago Press Ltd.

Klein, M. (1984a (1930)). The importance of symbol-formation in the development of the ego. In: M.

Klein. Love, Guilt and Reparation and Other Works 1921-1945 (рр. 219-232).

Klein, M. (1984b (1940)). Mourning and its relation to manic-depressive states. In: M. Klein. Love, Guilt and Reparation and Other Works 1921-1945 (рр. 344-369).

Knox, J. (1999). The relevance of attachment theory to a contemporary Jungian view of the internal world: internal working models, implicit memory and internal objects. J Anal Psychol, 44(4), 511-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00117

Laplanche, J., Pontalis J.-B. (1973). The Language of Psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press & The Institute of Psychoanalysis.

Laplanche,J.andPontalis,J.-B.(2003(1968)).Fantasy and the origins of sexuality. In: R. Steiner Unconscious phantasy (рр. 107 -143). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429484469-5

Lauro Grotto, R. (2008). The unconscious as an ultrametric set. The American Imago, 64(4), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2008.0009 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429484469-5

Matte Blanco, I. (1975). The Unconscious as Infinite Sets: An Essay in Bi-Logic. London: Duckworth. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429483592

Matte Blanco, I. (2005 (1988)). Thinking, Feeling, and Being. Clinical Reflections on the Fundamental Antinomy of Human Beings and World. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358849

Mijolla, Alain de (Еd.). (2005). International dictionary of psychoanalysis (Vol. 1-4). New York: Thomson Gale.

Mitchell, S. (1981). The origin and nature of the «object» in the theories of Klein and Fairbairn. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.1981.10745670

Contemp Psychoanal, 17, 374-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.1981.10745670

Nanay, B. (2021). Mental Imagery. In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/mental-imagery/

Nanay, B. (2021a). Unconscious mental imagery. Phil Trans R Soc B 376: 20190689. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0689

Ogden, T. H. (2004 (1986)). The Matrix of the Mind. Object Relations and the Psychoanalytic Dialogue. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429482403

Ogden, T. H. (2011). Reading Susan Isaacs: Toward a radically revised theory of thinking. Int J Psychoanal, 92, 925-942. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00413.x

Perlow, M. (1995). Understanding Mental Objects. London & New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203360187

Pitt, D. (2022). Mental Representation. In: E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman (Eds.). The Stan- ford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/en-tries/mental-representation/

Priest, G. (2005). The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rayner, E., Tuckett, D. (2005). An introduction to Matte Blanco’s reformulation of the Freudian unconscious and his conceptualization of the internal world. In: I. Matte Blanco Thinking, Feeling, and Being. Clinical Reflections on the Fundamental Antinomy of Human Beings and World (3-34). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358849-6

Robbins, M. (2018). The Primary Process: Freud’s Profound Yet Neglected Contribution to the Psychology of Consciousness. Psychoanal Inq, 38(3), 186-197. https://doi.org/10. 1080/07351690.2018.1430965

Saad, A. (2020). On the logic of the unconscious. Int J Psychoanal, 101(2), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2020.1726713

Saad, A. (2022). On the logic of unconscious objects. Int J Psychoanal, 103(4), 581-600. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2022.2028551

Sandler, J., (Еd.). (1988). Projection, Identification, Projective Identification. London: Karnac Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429478567

Sandler, J. (1990). On internal object relations. J Amer Psychoanal Assn, 38, 859-880. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306519003800401

Sandler, J. (1990a). On the structure of internal objects and internal object relationships. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351699009533805

Psychoanal Inq, 10(2), 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351699009533805  Sandler, J. (2003). On attachment to internal objects. Psychoanal Inq, 23(1), 12-26.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07351692309349024

Sandler, J., Sandler, A.-M. (2003 (1998)). Internal Objects Revisited. London: Karnac Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429476099

Scharff, D. E. (Еd.). (2005). Object Relations Theory and Practice: An Introduction. Selected and Integrated by D. E. Scharff. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216436898

Selesnick, S. A., Owen, G. S. (2012). Quantum-like logics and schizophrenia. J Appl Logic, 10, 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2011.12.001

Smith, D. L. (1999). Freud’s Philosophy of the Unconscious. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1611-6

Spillius, E. B., Milton, J., Garvey, P., Couve, C., and Steiner, D. (Еds.). (2011). The New Dictionary of Kleinian Thought. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203815762

Steiner, R. (2003). Introduction. In: R. Steiner (Еd.). Unconscious phantasy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429484469-1

Steiner, R. (Еd.). (2003). Unconscious phantasy. London: Karnac. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429484469

Strachey J. (Ed.). (1953-1964). The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.

Svrakic, D., Zorumski, C. (2021). Neuroscience of Object Relations in Health and Disorder: A Proposal for an Integrative Model. Front Psychol 12:583743 (рр. 1-25). https://doi.rg/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.58374 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583743

Torok, M. (1994 (1968)). The illness of mourning and the fantasy of the exquisite corpse. In: N. Abraham, M. Torok. The Shell and the Kernel: Renewals of Psychoanalysis (Vol. 1, рр. 107-124). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

VandenBos, G. R. (Еd.). (2015). APA Dictionary of Psychology (2nd еd.). Washington: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14646-000

Vasylchenko, A. (2015). Towards the logic of projective identification. J Appl Logic, 13, 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2015.03.008

Vasylchenko, A. (2025a). Internal Object Relations and the Logic of the Unconscious. Organon F 32(2), to appear. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2025.32201

Vasylchenko, A. (2025b). The Logic of Object Relations. LOGICA 2025. Abstracts. Hejnice, pp. 88-90. https://logika.flu.cas.cz/images/konference/Logica2025/L25-abstracts-compressed.pdf#page=92

Weiss, E. (1939). The psychic presence. Bull Menninger Clinic, 3, 177-183.

Weiss, E. (1947). Projection, Extrajection and Objectivation. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 16(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1947.11925686

Wollheim, R. (1984). The Thread of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zizzi, P., Pregnolato, M. (2012). Quantum logic of the unconscious and schizophrenia. NeuroQuantology, 10(3), 566-579. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2012.10.3.550

Нарис 5

Гончаров, К. (2022). Українці входять до топ-10 найнещасніших націй – соціологи. У: DW. Суспільство: Україна (2022, 3 лютого). https://www.dw.com/uk/ukraintsi- vkhodiat-do-top-10-naineshchasnishykh-natsii-sotsiolohy/a-60642782

Єфименко, В. (2002). Щастя. У Філософський енциклопедичний словник (с. 729). Київ: Абрис.

Кисельов, М. М., Гардашук, Т. В., Грабовський, С. І. та ін. (2024). Етика науки: виклики сучасності: монографія. Ніжин: Видавець ПП Лисенко М. М.

Кортасар, Х. (2009). Читанка для Мануеля: роман. Харків: Фоліо.

Кримський, С. Б. (2010). Про софійність, правду, смисли людського буття. У: Збірник науково-публіцистичних і філософських статей. Київ.

Луман, Н. (2010). Реальність масмедіа. В. Іванов, М. Мінаков (Ред.). Київ: ЦВП.

У світовому рейтингу щастя Україна займає п’яте місце з кінця – опитування (2021). У: LB. Ukraine. https://lb.ua/society/2021/01/14/475196_svitovomu_reytingu_ shchastya_ukraina.html

Франкл, В. (2004). Людина в пошуках справжнього сенсу. Київ: КСД.

Ярощук, О. (2017). (Не)щаслива нація. Чи справді українці – найнещасніші у Європі? Вокс Україна. https://voxukraine.org/ne-shhasliva-natsiya-chi-spravdi-ukrayintsi-najneshhasnishi-u-yevropi

Ballas, D. (2013). What makes a «happy city»? Cities, 32(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.009

Besser, L. (2021). The Philosophy of Happiness. An Interdisciplinary Introduction. 1st ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-L033-2

Building a Sustainable and Desirable Economy-in-Society-in-Nature. Report to the United Nations for the 2012 Rio+20 Conference (2013). ANU E Press.

Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The Relationship Between Nature Con- nectedness And Happiness: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. Sec. Cognitive Science, 5, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976

Conti de Melo, D., Roble de Elua, G. L., Santos, J. M., Corrêa, R. M. (2012). Innovative Cities: the Way of Management, Sustainability and Future. RISUS – Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.24212/2179-3565.2012v3i1p75-88

Costanza, R. (2008). Ecological Economics: Creating a Sustainable and Desirable Future. Iowa State University. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00619-4

Creative Cities Network. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/creative-cities?hub=80094

Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. In: A. D. Paul (Ed.), W. Melvin (Red.). Nations and Households in Eco- nomic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz. (рp. 89-125). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7

Frey, B. S. (2011). Peace, war, and happiness: Bruder Klaus as wellbeing facilitator. Inter- national Journal of Wellbeing, 1(2), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v1i2.5

Gardashuk, T. (2022). Environmental Threats of War in Ukraine. In: Envigogica, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.639

Global Happiness and Wellbeing. Policy Report 2019 (2019). Global Council for Happiness and Wellbeing.

Grau-Ruiz, R., Løvoll, H. S., & Dyrdal, G. M. (2024). Norwegian Outdoor Happiness: Residential Outdoor Spaces and Active Leisure Time Contributions to Subjective Well-being at the National Population Level at the Start of and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Happiness Studies, 25(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-024-00732-z

Gullone, E. (2000). The Biophilia Hypothesis and Life in the 21st Century: Increasing Mental Health or Increasing Pathology? Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(3), 293-322. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010043827986

Happy City Index (2024). https://happy-city-index.com/

Heinelt, H., Terizakis, G. (2020). Innovative cities: how to explain differences between cities? An answer based on an interpretive approach. Urban Research & Practice, 14(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1723032

Keat, R. (2000). Market Boundaries and Human Goods. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 45, 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100003283

Kellert, S. (1997). The Value of Life. Biological Diversity and Human Society. Island Press. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. Penguin Books.

Outdoor Education in the Norwegian and Dutch Curriculum Compared. https://home.uia.no/arjenr13/outdoor-education/fri-109/outdoor-education-in-the-norwe-gian-and-dutch-curriculum/

Principles of Sociological Inquiry: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. https://saylor-dotorg.github.io/text_principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantita-tive-methods/s09-02-conceptualization.html

Sjöblom, P., Eklund, G., & Fagerlund, P. (2021). Student teachers’ views on outdoor education as a teaching method – two cases from Finland and Norway. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2021.2011338

The (Un)Happy Planet Index. The Index of Human Well-Being and Environmental Impacts (1986). NEF; FoE.

The (Un)Happy Planet Index 2.0. Why good lives don’t have to cost the Earth (2007). NEF.

Veenhoven, R., Diener, E., & Michalos, A. (2000). What this journal is about. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010077309452

Wilson, E. O. (1995). Naturalist. Warner Books; Island Press.

World Database of Happiness. Archive of Research Findings on Subjective Enjoyment of Life. https://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/search-the-database/bibliography/

Zelenski, J. M., Nisbet, E. K. (2014). Happiness and Feeling Connected: The Distinct Role of Nature Relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512451901

Östlund, S. (2024). Well-Being Contextualism and Capabilities. Journal of Happiness Studies, 25(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-024-00718-x

Нарис 6

Андрух, В. С., Андрух, В. Н., Слободян, М. В. (2016). Антоній Кемпінскі (Entoni, Ignaci- Tadeusz Kępiński): медична і наукова діяльність відомого польського психіатра. Міжнародний журнал педіатрії, акушерства та гінекології, 9(1), 56-60.

Вяткіна, Н. (2012). Пряма референція, деференція і de re комунікація. Філософська думка, 3, 78-85.

Вяткіна, Н. (2019). Теорія значення, деференція і нормативність. Філософська думка, 5, 40-51.

Вяткіна, Н. (2022а). War, Massmedia and the Problems within Reference. In: A. Konverskyi et al (Eds.). The Days of Science of the Faculty of Philosophy – 2022. International Scientific Conference «The Days of Science of the Faculty of Philosophy – 2022» (Abstracts) (pp. 161- 167). Kyiv: Publishing center «Kyiv University»/

Вяткіна, Н. (2022b). Наукові комунікації з погляду еволюції соціосемантичних мереж знань. Комунікативні трансформації в сучасній науці (с.117-140). Київ: Інститут філософії імені Г. С. Сковороди НАН України.

Вяткіна, Н. (2022c). Реальність інформаційної зброї. Есе. Філософська думка, 3, 115-118. https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/622

Вяткіна, Н. (2023). Concept of deference: semantic and pragmatic interaction. Матеріали XVII Конгресу з логіки, методології, філософії науки і технології (с. 528-530). Буенос-Айрес. https://clmpst2023.dc.uba.ar/pdf-sched-abstracts/

Єрмоленко, В., Кебуладзе, В. (2023). Навіщо нам слова?_KultPodkast. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4Jjl6Ajx7g

Ідеологія і політичні переконання. https://www.thephilosopher1923.org/events/ideology-and-political-belief

Кемпінські, А. (2000). Шизофренічний світ. Часопис Ї, 37(5).

Лютий, Т. (2020). Влада медіа. В: Культура принад і спротиву (576 с.). Київ: Темпора.

Малярчук , Т. (2023) «Ми нічого не знали про Україну»: німецькі досвіди письменниці Тані Малярчук. https://pen.org.ua/my-nichoho-ne-znaly-pro-ukrayinu-nimecki-dosvidy-pysmennyci-tani-malyarchuk

Пархоменко-Куцевіл, О. (2022). Проблеми забезпечення інформаційної безпеки під час здійснення військових операцій та бойових дій. Публічне управління і адміністрування в Україні, 28,177-182.

Попович, М. (2016). Відповідальна людина – чи винні обставини? _Бути людиною (с. 225-235). Київ: ВД «Києво-Могилянська академія”».

Янкович, Н. (2023) Ніна Янковіч: російська інформаційна війна в Україні провалюється. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dfxXNmcI-E&list=PLteX4Oo4FBkQa3LMbShIGwG5gPPzWkNV-&index=20

Abrahams, A., Lim, G. (2020). Repress/redress: What the “war on terror can teach us about fighting misinformation.The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-032

Alonso-Martín-Romo, L., Oliveros-Mediavilla, M., Vaquerizo-Domínguez, E. (2023). Perception and opinion of the Ukrainian population regarding information manipulation: A field study on disinformation in the Ukrainian war. Profesional de la información, 32(4), 320-405. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.jul.05

Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199276382.001.0001

Arellano, A. (2020). Mill on Deference and Democratic Character. Political Research Quarterly, 74(4), 1125-1136.

Brinkmann, M. (2020). In Defence of Non-ideal Political Deference. Episteme, 19, 264-285. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2020.26

De Brabanter, Ph., Leclercq, B. (2023). From Semantic Deference to Semantic Externalism to Metasemantic Disagreement. Topoi, 4, 1039-1050 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09906-5

Chang, Y., et al. (2019). The Value of Misinformation and Disinformation. arXiv, 5.

Dictionary. https://www.dictionary.com/e/misinformation-vs-disinformation-get-informed-on-the-difference/  

Dunn, J. M. (2016). An Engeneer in Philosopher’s Clothing. Outstandin Contributions to Logic. In: K. Bimbó (Ed.). Springer (рр. xvii-xxxv).

Dunn, J. M. (2001). The concept of information and the development of modern logic. In: W. Stelzner and M. Stoeckler (Еds). Zwischen traditioneller und moderner Logik: Nichtklassiche Ansätze (pр. 423-447).

Dunn, J.M. (1966). The Algebra of Intensional Logic. Thesis. January 1996. Indiana Uni- versity Bloomigton. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263125907_The_Al-gebra_of_Intensional_Logics.

Elinson, G. (2022). The Politics of Deference. Vanderbilt Law Review. Harvard Public Law Working Paper (Vol. 75, 21-42).

Floridi, L. (2015) https://fivebooks.com/best-books/luciano-floridi-philosophy-inform-ation/Interview by Nigel Warburton

Hannikainen, I. R. et al. (2022). Coordination and expertise foster legal textualism. PNAS, 119(44). Princeton: Princeton University, NJ.

Ikuta, J. C. (2014). Mill as Ambivalent Democrat: The Corruption and Сultivation of Hu- man Flourishing in Democratic Society and Politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 41(7),697-724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453714547895

Jaszczolt, K. M. (2024). Representing Discourse Meaning: Default Semantics and Functional propositions. https://sites.google.com/view/k-m-jaszczolt  https://cambridge.academia.edu/KasiaJaszczolt

Lafont, K. (2020). Democracy without Shortcuts (268 p.).Oxford University Press.

Lewandowsky, S. et al. (2013). Misinformation, disinformation, and violent conflict: from Iraq and the «War on Terror» to future threats to peace. Am Psychol, 68(7), 487-501. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034515

Luhmann, N. (2000) The Reality of the Mass Media. Stanford University Press. Mahtani, A. (2017). Deference, respect and intensionality. Philos Stud, 174, 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0675-6

Mandić, J., Klarić, D. (2023). Case Study of the Russian Disinformation Campaign During the War in Ukraine. Propaganda Narratives, Goals and Impacts, 24( 2). https://doi.org/10.37458/nstf.24.2.5

Mares, E. (2024). Logic and Information. Cambridge Elements. Elements in Philosophy and Logic. Published online by Cambridge University Press https://www.cambridge.org/9781009466752 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009466745

Maricarmen, M., Sequoiah-Grayson, S. (2023). Logic and Information. In: N. Zalta-Ed- ward, U. Nodelman (Еds.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/logic-information/

Mazepus, H., Bartusevičius, H., Leeuwen van, F., Laustsen, L., & Tollefsen, A. F. (2023). Russia’s a-acks on civilians strengthen Ukrainian resistance. PNAS Nexus, 2(12). https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad386

Mill, J. S. (1963-1991). Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. In: J. Robson (Ed.). 33 Vols. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Moore, A. (2012). Political Authority and Scientific Authority: What Does Deference Mean? SPS. Scienceconf/3563/_Montreal_Abstract.pdf

Nöth, W. (2013). Charles S. Peirce’s Theory of Information: A Theory of the Growth of Symbols and of Knowledge. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 19(1-2), 137-161.

Pasitselska, О. (2022). Better ask your neighbor: Renegotiating media trust during the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Human Communication Research, 48(2), 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqac003

Passmore, J. (1957). A Hundred Years of Philosophy. London: Cox&Wyman Ltd; , Faken- ham and Reading.

Peter, F. (2023a). The Grounds of Political Legitimacy (245 p.). Oxford University Press.

Peter, F. (2023b). 8 Political Deference. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198872382.003.0008

Peter, F. (2023c). Political Deference. Brown Bag Seminars of Political Philosophy in cooperation with Political Philosophy Seminar. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198872382.003.0008

Pocock, J. G. A. (1976). The Classical Theory of Deference. The American Historical Review, 81(3), 516-523. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/81.3.516

Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., & Abin, R. (1993). Measuring epistemic authority: Studies of politicians and professors. European Journal of Personality, 7(2), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410070204

Recanati, F. (2000). Response to Woodfield: Deferential Concepts. Mind and Language, 15,452-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00144

Sam Atis (2024). https://www.samstack.io/p/recommendations-and-thoughts-about?-publication

Saward, M. (2010). 6 Representation, legitimacy, and democracy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780199579389.003.0007.

Schroeter, L., Schroeter, F. (2016). Semantic Deference Versus Semantic Coordination. American Philosophical Quaterly, 53(2).

Social: Cognitive Authority. https://handwiki.org/wiki/Social:Cognitive_authority

Sreenivasan, G. (2020). Deference and delegation: What is the difference? ZEMO,_3, 345-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42048-020-00075-3

Stanley, J. (2015). How Propaganda Works. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400865802

Stojanovic, I., De Brabanter , Ph., Villanueva-Fernandez, N., Nicolas, D. (2005). Deferential Utterances. IJN (Institut Jean Nicod); Jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00000575

Sutcliffe-Braithwaite, F. (2018). Class, Politics, and the Decline of Deference in England, 1968-2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198812579.001.0001

Thuns, A. (2020). Semantic Deference and Groundedness. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 20(3), 415-434.

Wilson, P. (1983). Second-Hand Knowledge: An Inquiry Into Cognitive Authority (210 p.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Williams, D. (2024). Misinformation researchers are wrong; There can’t be a science of misleading content. https://substack.com/home/post/p-140174738

Woodfield, A. (2000). Reference and Deference. Mind and Language, (15), 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00143

Нарис 7

Маєвський, О. Л. (2020). Функціональний успіх інтелектуальних автоматів. У: Наукові записки НаУКМА. Філософія та релігієзнавство (Т. 5, с. 15-25). https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-1678.2020.5.15-25

Маєвський, О. Л. (2021). Кластерний аналіз і механіка досвіду. Семіотичний аналіз явищ культури (с. 350-393). Київ: ІФ НАНУ. https://web.archive.org/web/20220415072219 ; https://www.filosof.com.ua/Mentaltheorie/P8.pdf

Маєвський, О. Л. (2022). Комунікативна раціональність сучасних інтелектуальних автоматів. Комунікативні трансформації в сучасній науці (с. 219-278). Київ: ІФ НАНУ. https://www.filosof.com.ua/elektronna_biblioteka  ; https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QW2XpbO6oUA67TBCPB704KENEV8IKxEa

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21 (pp. 610-623). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Caucheteux, C., King, J.-R. (2022). Brains and algorithms partially converge in natural language processing. Communications Biology, 5(134). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03036-1 https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Jaegle, A., Gimeno, F., Brock, A., Zisserman, A., Vinyals, O., Carreira, J. (2021). Perceiver: General Perception with Iterative A-ention. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, (139). https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03206

Kaelbling, L. P., Li-man, M. L., Moore, A. W. (1996). Reinforcement Learning: A Sur- vey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, (4), 237-285. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9605103 https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.301

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444.

Long Ouyang, Wu, J., Xu Jiang, Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Chong Zhang, Agarwal, S., Slama, K. … Lowe, R. (2022). Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. arXiv:2203.02155 (cs.CL). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.02155  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

McCulloch, W. S., Pi-s, W. (1943). A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5(4), 115-133. https://waldirbertazzijr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/mcp.pdf  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259

OpenAI (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv:2303.08774 (cs.CL). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762

Нарис 8

Вейль, Г. (1989). Геометрия и физика. В: Г. Вейль Математическое мышление (с. 194- 212). Москва: Наука.

Гильберт, Д. (1969). Математические проблемы. В: П. С. Александров (Ред.). Проблемы Гильберта. Москва: Наука.

Гильберт, Д., Бернайс, П. (1979). Основания математики: Логические исчисления и формализация арифметики. Москва: Наука.

Гильберт, Д., Бернайс, П. (1982). Основания математики: Теория доказательств. Москва: Наука.

Кохан, Я. (2009). Непомічена металогічна дисципліна. У: Філософські діалоги’2009 (с. 325-340). Київ.

Кохан, Я. (2010). Логічна можливість як семантична категорія. Філософська думка, 5, 68-78.

Кохан, Я. (2012). Інтенсіональні та прагматичні предикати. Філософська думка, 2, 61-69.

Кохан, Я. (2012a). Розуміння мовних виразів. Філософська думка, 3, 55-68.

Кохан, Я. О. (2012b). Теоретичний апарат логічної семантики в математичних та емпіричних дисциплінах. У: М. В. Попович (Ред.). Теорія смислу в гуманітарних дослі- дженнях та інтенсіональні моделі в точних науках (с. 188-220). Київ: Наук. думка. Кохан, Я. О. (2013). Виражальні можливості формальних мов. Ч. 2. У Мова і культура, 16(163), 13-21. Київ: ВД Дмитра Бураго.

Кохан, Я. О. (2022). Система альтернатив як теоретичний об’єкт логіки. У: Математична логіка та програмування. Досвід викладання (с. 83-103). Одеса: Гельветика.

Кужель, А. В. (1986). Математические структуры. В: А. Я. Дороговцев (Ред.). Математика сегодня’86. Научно-методический сборник (с. 8-26). Киев: Вища школа.

Шрамко, Я. В. (2012). Істина і хиба: місце й роль істиннісних значень у логіці та філософії. У: М. В. Попович (Ред.). Теорія смислу в гуманітарних дослідженнях та інтенсіональні моделі в точних науках (с. 169-187). Київ: Наук. думка.

Эббинхаус, Г.-Д., Якобс, К., Ман, Ф.-К., Хермес, Г. (1972). Машины Тьюринга и рекурсивные функции. Москва: Мир.

Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and Necessity. A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://archive.org/details/meaningand-necess033225mbp/page/n9/mode/2up

Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic Structures (2nd ed.). Berlin New York: Mouton de Gruyter.  https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218329

Church, A. (1936). A Note on the Entscheidungsproblem. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1(1), 40-41.

Church, A. (1941). The Calculi of Lambda-Conversion. Annals of Mathematics Studies, 6. Princeton: Princeton University Press; London: Humphrey Milford Oxford University Press (reprinted: New York: Kraus Reprint Corp., 1965).

Church, A. (1956). Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Princeton; New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Frege, G. (1956). The Thought: A Logical Inquiry. Mind, New Series, 65(259), 289-311.

Frege, G. (1960). Begriffsschrift. In: P. Geach, M. Black (Еds.). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pр. 1-20). Oxford: Basil Blackwell  https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/65.1.289

Frege, G. (1960a). Function and Concept. In: P. Geach, M. Black (Еds.). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pр. 21-41). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Frege, G. (1960b). Negation. In: P. Geach, M. Black (Еds.). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pр. 117-135). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Frege, G. (1960c). On Concept and Object. In: P. Geach, M. Black (Еds). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pр. 42-55). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Frege, G. (1960d). On Sense and Reference. In: P. Geach, M. Black (Еds.). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pр. 56-78). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Frege, G. (1979). (Dialogue with Piinjer on Existence). In: G. Frege. Posthumous Writings (p. 53-67). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Frege, G. (1979a). Logic. In: G. Frege. Posthumous Writings (pр. 126-151). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Frege, G. (2016). Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Derived using concept-script. (Vol.1-2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kleene, S. C. (1967). Mathematical Logic (pр. xiii, 398). Mineola New York: Dover Publications.

Kokhan, Y. (2012). Semantic presuppositions in logical syntax. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 22(1-2), 41-55.

Pace, N. (2006). Time for a change. Nature, 441(289). https://doi.org/10.1038/441289a

Popper, K. (2005). The Logic of Scientific Descovery (pр. xxviii, 513). London; New York: Routledge Classics. https://doi.org/10.1038/441289a

Russell, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind, New Series, 14(56), 479-493. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479

Russell, B. (1918). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. The Monist, 28(4), 495-527. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27900704
https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19182843

Russell, B. (1919). On Propositions: What They are and How They Mean. Aristotelian Society Supplementary (Vol. 2 (1), рр.1-43). https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/2.1.1

Russell, B. (1919a). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. The Monist, 29(1), 32-63. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27900724
https://doi.org/10.5840/monist191929120

Russell, B. (1919b). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. The Monist, 29(2), 190-222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27900737
https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19192922

Russell, B. (1956). Logical Atomism. In: B. Russell. Logic and Knowledge: Essays, 1901- 1950 (pр. 321-344). New York: The Macmillan Company.

Russell, B. (2010). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. (pр. vii, 208). https://people.umass.edu/~klement/imp/imp-ebk.pdf

Whitehead, A. N., Russell, B. (1950). Principia Mathematica (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pр. xlvi, 674). Cambridge.