Publishing House “Akademperiodyka”

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Books Scientific monographs

Air pollution control on the basis of sensor networks

Authors:

Babak Vitalii
Google Scholar:https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?user=3Gr9I7QAAAAJ&hl=ru&oi=ao
Scopus ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57218226416
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-4307
Researcher ID:https://publons.com/researcher/AAH-6948-2020/

Zaporozhets Artur
Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?user=8xMuKuoAAAAJ&hl=uk&oi=sra
Scopus ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57192642007
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0704-4116
Researcher ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/615474

Reviewers:

V.I. OSADCHYI, Doctor of Geography, Academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the SES of Ukraine, and the NAS of Ukraine
Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?user=2OUM-usAAAAJ&hl=ru&oi=ao
Scopus ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57194798977
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0428-4827
Researcher ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/12924510

M.M. KULYK, Doctor of Engineering, Academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, General Energy Institute of the NAS of Ukraine
Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?user=RDFUk_sAAAAJ&hl=uk
Scopus ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57197052079
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-7027
Researcher ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/10340526

Year:  2025
Pages: 354
ISBN: 978-966-360-560-9
Publication Language: Ukrainian
Publisher: PH “Akademperiodyka”
Place Published: Kyiv
The monograph addresses the problems of atmospheric pollution due to fossil fuel combustion at energy-intensive facilities, in particular, thermal power plants, CHPs, and boiler houses. The methodology of a hierarchical control system based on a spatially distributed wireless sensor network, with the use of mathematical models of pollution and algorithms for statistical analysis, is proposed. The process of localisation of pollution sources, development of the hardware and software system, and experimental verification of its effectiveness are described in detail.
The book is intended for researchers, engineers, as well as teachers, postgraduate students, and students of higher education institutions dealing with the problems of pollution control from energy facilities, environmental monitoring, scientific instrumentation, and metrology.

References:
  1. Hua Y., Oliphant M., Hu E. J. Development of renewable energy in Australia and China: A comparison of policies and status. Renewable Energy. 201685. P. 1044-1051. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.renene.2015.07.060
  2. Luong N.D. A critical review on energy efficiency and conservation policies and programs in Vietnam. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015. Vol. 52. P. 623-634 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.161
  3. Kudria S.O. Stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku vidnovliuvanoi enerhetyky v Ukraini (za materialamy naukovoi dopovidi na zasidanni Prezydii NAN Ukrainy 7 zhovtnia 2015 r.). Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy. 2015. № 12. S. 19-26. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2015.12.100
  4. Denysiuk S.P., Tarhonskyi V.A. Stalyi rozvytok enerhetyky Ukrainy u svitovykh vymirakh. Enerhetyka: ekonomika, tekhnolohii, ekolohiia. 2017. № 3. S. 7-31. https://doi.org/10.20535/1813-5420.4.2017.130871 5. Lambert J.G., Hall C.A., Balogh S., Gupta A., Arnold M. Energy, EROI and quality of life. Energy Policy. 2014. Vol. 64. P. 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.001
  5. Artemchuk V.O., Bilan T.R., Blinov I.V., Dekusha O.L., Zaporozhets A.O., Ivanov H.A. ta in. Teoretychni ta prykladni osnovy ekonomichnoho, ekolohichnoho ta tekhnolohichnoho funktsionuvannia obiektiv enerhetyky. Viddilennia fizyko-tekhnichnykh problem enerhetyky NAN Ukrainy. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2529712
  6. Cherkasova T.I., Shyshman N.V. Problemy zabezpechennia efektyvnosti modernizatsii komunalnoi teploenerhetyky. Biznes- navihator. 2018. № 2-1 (45). S. 91-94.
  7. Khalatov A.A. Enerhetychna bezpeka Ukrainy: chy ye zapas mitsnosti? Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy. 2017. № 9. S. 23-32. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2017.09.023
  8. Paton B.Ye., Dolinskyi A.A., Basok B.I., Bazieiev Ye.T. Proekt Derzhavnoi tsilovoi prohramy modernizatsii komunalnoi teploenerhetyky na 2012-2016 roky – innovatsiina osnova tekhnolohichnoho onovlennia system teplozabezpechennia naselenykh punktiv Ukrainy. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy. 2012. № 9. S. 14-28. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2012.09.014
  9. Dolinskyi A.A., Basok B.I., Bazieiev Ye.T. Rehionalni prohramy modernizatsii komunalnoi teploenerhetyky – innovatsiina osnova tekhnolohichnoho onovlennia system teplozabezpechennia naselenykh punktiv Ukrainy. Chastyna 1. Promyshlennaia teplotekhnyka. 2012. № 34(3). S. 52-61.
  10. Basok B.I., Bazieiev Ye.T., Kuraieva I.V. Adaptatsiia komunalnoi teploenerhetyky do zmin klimatu. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy. 2021. № 4. S. 60-75. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2021.04.060
  11. Kyrylenko O.V., Basok B.I., Bazieiev Ye.T., Blinov I.V. Enerhetyka Ukrainy ta realii hlobalnoho poteplinnia. Tekhnichna elektrodynamika. 2020. № 3. S. 52-61.
  12. Basok B.I., Bazieiev Ye.T., Dubovskyi S.V. Pro problemu adaptatsii komunalnoi enerhetyky do hlobalnoho poteplinnia (ohliad). Teplofizyka ta teploenerhetyka. 2020. № 42(2). S. 48-59. https://doi.org/10.31472/ttpe.2.2020.5
  13. Khalatov A.A., Fialko N.M., Tymchenko M.P. Enerhetychna bezpeka Ukrainy: metodolohichni zasady otsinky rivnia bezpeky ta porivnialnyi analiz potochnoho stanu. Teplofizyka ta teploenerhetyka 2020. № 42(2). S. 18-30. https://doi.org/10. 31472/ttpe.2.2020.2
  14. Gattie D.K. US energy, climate and nuclear power policy in the 21st century: The primacy of national security. The Electricity Journal. 2020. Vol. 33(1). P. 106690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2019.106690
  15. Wei Y.M., Liang Q.M., Wu G., Liao H. Effects of clean and renewable energy on national energy security. Energy Economics. 2019. P. 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83867-293-520191010
  16. Sabishchenko O., Rębilas R., Sczygiol N., Urbański M. Ukraine energy sector management using hybrid renewable energy systems. Energies. 2020. Vol. 13(7). P. 1776. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071776
  17. Van de Graaf T., Colgan J. D. Russian gas games or well-oiled conflict? Energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis. Energy Research & Social Science. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 59- 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.018
  18. Yang M., Cela B., Yang F. Innovative energy policy to transform energy systems in Ukraine. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 2019. P. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09898-x
  19. Brusylovska O. Energy safety of Ukraine: Russian factor. Online Journal Modelling the New Europe. 2017. Vol. 22. P. 139-160. https://doi.org/10.24193/OJMNE.2017.22.07
  20. Rodríguez-Fernández L., Carvajal A.B.F., Ruiz-Gómez L. M. Evolution of European Union’s energy security in gas supply during Russia-Ukraine gas crises (2006-2009). Energy Strategy Reviews. 2020. Vol. 30. P. 100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100518
  21. Zaslavskyi V., Pasichna M. Optimization techniques for modelling energy generation portfolios in Ukraine and the EU: Comparative analysis. In International Conference on Dependability and Complex Systems. 2018. P. 545-555. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91446-6_51
  22. Dubrovskyi V.V., Shraibe O.A. World trends in the development of coal-fired thermal generation and their influence on the energy of Ukraine. The Problems of General Energy. 2020. Vol. 2(61). P. 11-16. https://doi.org/10.15407/pge2020.02.011
  23. Nádudvari Á., Abramowicz A., Fabiańska M., Misz-Kennan M., Ciesielczuk J. Classifition of fies in coal waste dumps based on Landsat, Aster thermal bands and thermal camera in Polish and Ukrainian mining regions. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology. 2020. P. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-020-00375-4
  24. Zheliezna T.A., Drahniev S.V., Bashtovyi A.I. Mozhlyvosti zahotivli ahrobiomasy ta vyrobnytstva biopalyv z nei komunalnymy pidpryiemstvamy v Ukraini. Teplofizyka ta teploenerhetyka. 2019. № 2(41). S. 88-96. https://doi.org/10.31472/ttpe.2.2019.12
  25. Heletukha H.H., Zheliezna T.A., Drahniev S.V., Bashtovyi A.I. Osnovni tendentsii ta perspektyvy rozvytku rynku motornykh biopalyv v YeS ta v Ukraini. Teplofizyka ta teploenerhetyka. 2020. № 1(42). S. 69-76. https://doi.org/10.31472/ttpe.1.2020.8
  26. Pryshliak N., Tokarchuk D. Socio-economic and environmental benefits of biofuel production development from agricultural waste in Ukraine. Environmental & Socioeconomic Studies. 2020. Vol. 8(1). P. 18-27. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2020-0003
  27. Yemelyanov O., Symak A., Petrushka T., Zahoretska O.,Kusiy M., Lesyk R. et al. Changes in energy consumption, economic growth and aspirations for energy independence: Sectoral analysis of uses of natural gas in Ukrainian economy. Energies. 2019. Vol. 12(24). P. 4724. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244724
  28. Yakovenko K., Mišík M. Cooperation and security: Examining the political discourse on natural gas transit in Ukraine and Slovakia. Energies. 2020. Vol. 13(22). P. 5969. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225969
  29. Bilan T.R., Makarov V.M., Kaplin M.I. Prediction of the levels of development of coal industry with regard for risks and critical phenomena in the structure of its productive potential in the global coal market. The Problems of General Energy. 2019. Vol. 1(56). P. 12-18. https://doi.org/10.15407/pge2019.01.012
  30. Horoshkova L., Khlobystov I., Volkov V. Modelling of resource flows in the Coal industry of Ukraine. In Geoinformatics: Theoretical and Applied Aspects. 2020. Vol. 2020. No. 1. P. 1-6. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2020geo069
  31. Solonenchuk I.V. Peculiarities of reforming the energy resources market of Ukraine. Management. 2019. Vol. 30(2). P. 115-127. https://doi.org/10.30857/2415-3206.2019.2.9
  32. Yemelyanov O., Petrushka T., Symak A., Trevoho O., Turylo A., Kurylo O. et al. Microcredits for sustainable development of small Ukrainian enterprises: Efficiency, accessibility, and government contribution. Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12(15). P. 6184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156184
  33. Ritchie H., Roser M. Energy. Our World in Data. 2020. URL: https://ourworldindata.org/energy
  34. Ediger V.Ş. An integrated review and analysis of multienergy transition from fossil fuels to renewables. Energy Procedia. 2019. Vol. 156. P. 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.073
  35. Shahzad U., Fareed Z., Shahzad F., Shahzad K. Investigating the nexus between economic complexity, energy consumption and ecological footprint for the United States: New insights from quantile methods. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. Vol. 279. P. 123806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123806
  36. Hanif I., Raza S. M. F., Gago de Santos P., Abbas Q. Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: Some empirical evidence. Energy. 2019. Vol. 171. P. 493-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.011
  37. Oberschelp C., Pfister S., Raptis C. E., Hellweg S. Global emission hotspots of coal power generation. Nature Sustainability. 2019. Vol. 2(2). P. 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0221-6
  38. Guo Y., Chen B., Li J., Yang Q., Wu Z. & Tang X. The evolution of China’s provincial shared producer and consumer responsibilities for energy-related mercury emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. Vol. 245. P. 118678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118678
  39. International Energy Agency. Data & statistics. URL: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics
  1. Dong K., Dong X., Dong C. Determinants of the global and regional CO2 emissions: What causes what and where? Applied Economics. 2019. Vol. 51(46). P. 5031-5044. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1606410
  2. Khayyam U., Nazar U. Energy production and CO2 emissions: The case of coal fired power plants under China Pakistan economic corridor. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. Vol. 281. P. 124974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124974
  3. Li K., Fang L., He L. How population and energy price affect China’s environmental pollution? Energy policy. 2019, Vol. 129. P. 386-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol. 2019.02.020
  4. Amann M., Kiesewetter G., Schöpp W., Klimont Z., Winiwarter W., Cofala J. et al. Reducing global air pollution: The scope for further policy interventions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 2020. Vol. 378(2183). P. 20190331 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0331
  5. Popov O., Iatsyshyn A., Kovach V., Artemchuk V., Kameneva I., Taraduda D. et al. Risk assessment for the population of Kyiv, Ukraine as a result of atmospheric air pollution. Journal of Health and Pollution. 2020. Vol. 10(25). P. 200303. https://doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-10.25.200303
  6. Chiu Y.B., Lee C.C. Effects of financial development on energy consumption: The role of country risks. Energy Economics. 2020. Vol. 90. P. 104833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104833
  7. Brych V.Ya., Fedirko M.M. Kontseptsiia enerhoefektyvnosti v konteksti staloho rozvytku komunalnoi teploenerhetyky Ukrainy. Ukrainskyi zhurnal prykladnoi ekonomiky. 2018. № 3(1). S. 26-35.
  8. Novikov D.A. Ekonomichni aspekty reformuvannia sfery teplopostachannia. Mizh- narodnyi naukovyi zhurnal «Internauka». Seriia: «Ekonomichni nauky». 2020. № 5(37). № 91-96. https://doi.org/10.25313/2520-2294-2020-5-6025
  9. Zaporozhets A.O. Kompiuteryzovana systema kontroliu protsesu spaliuvannia palyva v kotloahrehatakh maloi ta serednoi potuzhnosti. Dys. kand. tekhn. nauk: 05.13.05 / Instytut elektrodynamiky NAN Ukrainy. 2017.
  10. Kliuchnikova M.V. Teoretyko-pravovi aspekty vidtvorennia osnovnykh vyrobnychykh zasobiv pidpryiemstv komunalnoi teploenerhetyky. Tekhnolohichnyi audyt ta rezervy vyrobnytstva. 2015. № 1/6(21). S. 47-51. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.38627
  11. Zaporozhets A.O., Sverdlova A.D. Analiz metodiv diahnostuvannia teploenerhetychnykh obiektiv. Naukoiemni tekhnolohii. 2017. № 35(3). S. 259-265. https://doi.org/10.18372/2310-5461.35.11846
  12. Ivanov S.O., Serhiienko R.V., Zaporozhets A.O., Burova Z.A. Zasoby pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti vyhotovlennia, kontroliu yakosti ta spaliuvannia palyva z roslynnoi biomasy. Materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Tsili staloho rozvytku tretoho tysiacholittia: vyklyky dlia universytetiv nauk pro zhyttia», 23-25 travnia 2018 r. Kyiv: NUBIP. 2018. S. 148-150.
  13. Sverdlova A., Zaporozhets A. Predicting anomaly conditions of energy equipment using neural networks. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021. Vol. 280. P. 09005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128009005
  14. Zaporozhets A. Analysis of control system of fuel combustion in boilers with oxygen sensor. Periodica Polytechnica Mechanical Engineering. 2019. Vol. 64(4). P. 241-248. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPme.12572
  15. Redko A., Zaporozhets A. Effect of changing oxygen concentration on formation of air-fuel mixture in aviation engines. Abstract book of International Symposium on Sustainable Aviation. 10-13 September, 2017. Kyiv: National Aviation University. 2017. P. 78.
  16. Zaporozhets A., Eremenko V., Redko O. Metrological assessment of the indirect method of measuring the concentration of oxygen in the air. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Optoelectronics and Lasers. 2019. P. 640-643. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAOL46282.2019.9019506
  17. Nechaieva T.P. Assessment of critical scenarios on the receipt of investments for the development of Ukrainian generating capacities. The Problems of General Energy. 2017. Vol. 4(51). P. 5-14. https://doi.org/10.15407/pge2017.04.005
  18. Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu ministriv Ukrainy «Pro Natsionalnyi plan skorochennia vykydiv vid velykykh spaliuvalnykh ustanovok» № 796-r vid 8 lystopada 2017 r. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/796-2017-%D1%80#Text
  19. Halak O.V., Sakhnenko M.D., Karakurkchi H.V., Matykin O.V., Kosarev O.V., Belousov I.O. Metody ochyshchennia hazovykh vykydiv vid khimichno-nebezpechnykh rechovyn dlia pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti filtruvalnykh system. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu «KhPI». Seriia: Innovatsiini doslidzhennia u naukovykh robotakh studentiv. 2018. № 18(1294). S. 89-93.
  20. Volchyn I.A., Haponych L.S., Zghoran I.P. Vybir tekhnolohii desulfuryzatsii dymovykh haziv dlia ukrainskykh vuhilnykh teplovykh elektrostantsii. Naukovi pratsi NUKhT. 2018. № 4(24). S. 154-168. https://doi.org/10.24263/2225-2924-2018-24-4-18
  21. Kolomiiets O.M. Ohliad tekhnolohii zmenshennia vykydiv oksydiv azotu na vuhilnykh teplovykh elektrostantsiiakh. Enerhotekhnolohii ta resursozabezpechennia. 2019. № (1). S. 50-59. https://doi.org/10.33070/etars.1.2019.05
  22. Stoliarenko H.S. Pererobka vuhlekysloty vidpratsovanykh haziv elektrostantsii. Visnyk Cherkaskoho derzhavnoho tekhnolohichnoho universytetu. 2020. № (1). S. 57-66. https://doi.org/10.24025/2306-4412.1.2020.185531
  23. Kovalenko L.O. Otsinka zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria naselenykh punktiv. Suchasni tekhnolohii ta metody rozrakhunkiv u budivnytstvi. 2017. № 6. S. 133-139.
  24. Tymoshenko O.A., Minovska A.V. Otsiniuvannia rivnia zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria statsionarnymy ta liniinymy dzherelamy vykydiv. Visnyk Prydniprovskoi derzhavnoi akademii budivnytstva. 2017. № 6. S. 65-71.
  25. Klymenko V.H., Tsyhichko O.Yu. Zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria: Metodychna rozrobka dlia studentiv-heohrafiv. KhNU im. V.N. Karazina. 2010. 26 s.
  26. Pavlychenko A.V., Buchavyi Yu.V., Anhurets O.V., Khazan P.V. Perspektyvy vprovadzhennia systemy operatyvnoho informuvannia naselennia pro yakist atmosfernoho povitria promyslovykh mist za mizhnarodnymy standartamy. Ecological Safety and Labour Protection. 2019. № 57. S. 178-191. https://doi.org/10.33271/crpnmu/57.178
  27. Hirii V.A., Kolisnyk I.A., Kosovets O.O., Kuznietsova T.O. Stan zabrudnennia navkolyshnoho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha na terytorii Ukrainy u 2017 r. Pratsi Tsentralnoi heofizychnoi observatorii imeni Borysa Sreznevskoho. 2018. № 14(28). S. 17-32.
  28. Kolisnyk I.A., Kosovets O.O. Khimichne zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria na pochatku XXI st. Pratsi Tsentralnoi heofizychnoi observatorii imeni Borysa Sreznevskoho. 2006. № 2(16). S. 35-43.
  29. Yatsenko Yu., Shevchenko O., Snizhko S. Otsinka suchasnoho rivnia ta tendentsii zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria mist dioksydom azotu. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. 2018. № 3(82). S. 87-95. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.82.11
  30. Yatsenko Yu., Shevchenko O. Klasyfikatsiia mist Ukrainy za rivnem zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka 2017. № 3-4(68-69). S. 25-30. http://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721. 2017.68.4 https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721
  31. Natsionalna dopovid pro stan navkolyshnoho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha v Ukraini u 2017 rotsi. Ministerstvo zakhystu dovkillia ta pryrodnykh resursiv Ukrainy. URL: https://bit.ly/3pksOVS
  32. Braverman V.Ya., Krutoholov I.O. Ekonomichna otsinka pokaznykiv zabrudnennia povitria tverdopalyvnymy lokalnymy kotelniamy. Enerhozberezhennia. Enerhetyka. Enerhoaudyt. 2022. Vol. 1-2(167-168). P. 3-10. https://doi.org/10.20998/2313-8890.2022.01.01
  33. Beshliaha O.V., Vovkodav H.M. Otsinka zabrudnennia povitrianoho baseinu mista Odesy fenolom. Visnyk Hidromettsentru Chornoho ta Azovskoho moriv. 2019. № 1(23). S. 56-61.
  34. Vovkodav H.M., Beshliaha O.V. Otsinka zabrudnennia povitrianoho baseinu mista Odesy sirkovodnem ta fenolom. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia. 2020. № (1). S. 94-101. https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.1.2020.203935
  35. Safranov T.A., Prykhodko V.Yu., Shanina T.P., Husieva K.D. SWOT-analiz ekolohichnoi skladovoi urbanizovanoi terytorii (na prykladi mista Odesa). Ukrainskyi hidrometeorolohichnyi zhurnal. 2019. № 23. S. 121-134. https://doi.org/10.31481/uhmj.23.2019.11
  36. Chuhai A.V., Cherniakova O.I., Bazyka Yu.V. Analiz tekhnohennoho navantazhennia na povitrianyi basein okremykh promyslovo-miskykh ahlomeratsii Skhidnoi Ukrainy (na prykladi mista Dnipro). Visnyk KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina. Seriia «Ekolohiia». 2018. № 19. S. 75-81. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4259-2018-19-07
  37. Bielokon K.V., Pirohova I.M. Analiz ta otsinka rivnia zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria m. Zaporizhzhia. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Dniprovskoho derzhavnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu (tekhnichni nauk). 2021. № 1(38). S. 149-158. https://doi.org/10.31319/2519-2884.38.2021.18
  38. Pavlenko O.I., Oriekhova O.V. Stan umov pratsi pratsivnykiv promyslovykh pidpryiemstv ta yakist atmosfernoho povitria ekolohichno nebezpechnoho rehionu. In Challenges and achievements of medical science and education: Collective monograph. 2020. Р. 235-252. Baltija Publishing. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-024-7-12
  39. Babushkina R.O., Matsko P.V., Shkliar O.D., Haran V.V. Analiz rezultativ doslidzhennia suchasnoho rivnia zabrudnennia atmosfery v Khersonskii oblasti. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. 2019. № 109. S. 163-172. https://doi.org/10.32851/2226- 0099.2019.109-1.25
  40. Lavrova T.V., Korychevskyi K.O., Voitsekhovych O.V. Zabrudnennia gruntiv i atmosfernoho povitria na terytoriiakh vplyvu kolyshnoho uranovoho vyrobnytstva VO «Prydniprovskyi khimichnyi zavod». Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Heohrafichni i heolohichni nauky. 2021. № 2(39). S. 64-77. https://doi.org/10.18524/2303-9914.2021.2(39).246195
  41. Maksymenko N., Volkova L., Krotko A. Prostorovo-chasova otsinka ekolohichnoho ryzyku vid zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria m. Kharkova. Naukovi zapysky Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Hnatiuka. Ser. Heohrafiia. 2020. № 1(48). S. 107-120. https://doi.org/10.25128/2519-4577.20.1.13
  42. Kryvenko H.M., Vozniak L.V., Zorin V.O. Analiz vykydiv zabrudniuvalnykh rechovyn v atmosferne povitria statsionarnymy dzherelamy. Ekolohichna bezpeka ta zbalansovane resursokorystuvannia. 2019. № 1(19). S. 85-93. https://doi.org/10.31471/2415-3184-2019-1(19)-85-93
  43. Chuhai A.V., Pylypiuk V.V., Borovska H.O. Analiz tekhnohennoho navantazhennia na pryrodnie seredovyshche Zaporizkoi oblasti. Visnyk KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina. Seriia «Ekolohiia». 2018. № 18. S. 97-105.
  44. Kovalenko L.O., Fomenko H.R. Analiz zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria miskykh terytorii. Komunalne hospodarstvo mist. 2019. № 1(147). S. 220-223. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2019-1-147-220-223
  45. Vasylenko L.O., Bereznytska Yu.O., Fedorenko S.V., Bereznyi M.I., Seheda P.F. Kontsentratsiia shkidlyvykh rechovyn u m. Kyievi. Ahrosvit. 2022. № 4. S. 56-63. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6792.2022.4.56
  46. Horskyi A. Otsinka tekhnohennoho vplyvu statsionarnykh dzherel zabrudnennia na stan povitrianoho baseinu Kyivskoi ahlomeratsii. Ekonomika pryrodokorystuvannia i stalyi rozvytok. 2021. № 9(28). S. 72-79. https://doi.org/10.37100/2616-7689.2021.9(28).10
  47. Voloshkina O. S., Anpilova Ye. S., Klimova I. V. Vyznachennia ryzyku dlia zdorovia naselennia vnaslidok pidvyshchennia zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria v m. Kyievi. Scientific Letters of Academic Society of Michal Baludansky. 2020. № 2(8). S. 116-123.
  48. Rabosh I.O., Kofanova O.V. Otsiniuvannia ryzykiv dlia zdorovia naselennia vnaslidok zabrudnennia dovkillia avtotransportom (na prykladi mista Kyieva). Enerhetyka: ekonomika, tekhnolohii, ekolohiia. 2018. № 4. S. 115-123. https://doi.org/10.20535/1813-5420.4.2018.175646
  49. Breus I., Karpliuk V., Rusakova T. Chyselne modeliuvannia zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria navkolo promyslovykh pidpryiemstv Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho universytetu. Seriia: Mekhanika. 2021. № 6(29). S. 11-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/372102
  1. Minina O., Shevchenko O., Moroz Ye. Zabrudnennia dovkillia yak skladova hlobalnoi ekolohichnoi kryzy: natsionalnyi riven. Naukovyi visnyk Polissia. 2021. № 2(21). S. 39-51. https://doi.org/10.25140/2410-9576-2020-2(21)-39-51
  2. Homonai, V.I., Bohosta, A.S., Lobko, V.Yu., Fedorishko, M.I. (2012). Doslidzhennia rivnia zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria m. Uzhhoroda protiahom 2011 roku. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu (Ser. Khimiia), 1(27), 90-95.
  3. Shershun S.M. Upravlinnia systemoiu ekolohichnoho monitorynhu v Ukraini: pravovi ta orhanizatsiini pytannia. Pravo i suspilstvo. 2015. № 1. S. 175-181.
  4. Yatsyshyn A.V., Kutsan Yu.H., Artemchuk V.O., Kameneva I.P., Popov O.O., Kovach V.O. Pryntsypy ta metody upravlinnia ekolohichnoiu bezpekoiu na osnovi intelektualnoho analizu danykh merezhi monitorynhu atmosfernoho povitria. Elektronne modeliuvannia. 2019. № 4. S. 85-102.
  5. Artemchuk V.O., Kameneva I.P., Yatsyshyn A.V., Yatsyshyn T.M. Metodychni ta informatsiini zasoby analizu ekolohichnykh ryzykiv na osnovi danykh monitorynhu. Modeliuvannia ta informatsiini tekhnolohii. 2018. № 83. S. 48-62.
  6. Artemchuk V.O., Yatsyshyn A.V., Popov O.O., Kyrylenko Yu.O., Yatsyshyn T.M. Perspektyvy rozrobky matematychnykh ta prohramnykh zasobiv perevirky ekolohichnoi efektyvnosti pryiniattia upravlinskykh rishen. Modeliuvannia ta informatsiini tekhnolohii. 2018. № 85. S. 75-80.
  7. Bobrykova Yu.S. Monitorynh navkolyshnoho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha Ukrainy. Materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Problemy nadzvychainykh sytuatsii» (20 travnia 2021 r., Kharkiv). 2021. S. 254-255.
  8. Zhyvchenko K.V. Ekolohichna bezpeka yak skladova derzhavnoi polityky Ukrainy. Materialy III Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Transformatsiia finansovoi systemy Ukrainy: tendentsii ta perspektyvy rozvytku» (27-28 lystopada 2019 r., m. Mykolaiv). 2019. S. 18-19.
  9. Popov S. Zabrudnennia povitria v Ukraini: khto zdiisniuie nahliad i kontrol (1 lystopada 2019 r.). URL: https://sud.ua/ru/news/publication/153640-zabrudnennya-povitrya-v-ukrayini-khto-zdiysnyuye-naglyad-i-kontrol
  10. Dmytriieva O.O., Varlamov Ye.M., Kvasov V.A., Palahuta O.A., Nesterenko L.M., Nesterenko U.Yu. Stan merezhi sposterezhennia za atmosfernym povitriam v Ukraini ta yii vidpovidnist vymoham Dyrektyvy 50/2008/YeS. Problemy okhorony navkolyshnoho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha ta ekolohichnoi bezpeky, 2016. № 38. S. 99-110.
  11. Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy «Deiaki pytannia zdiisnennia derzhavnoho monitorynhu v haluzi okhorony atmosfernoho povitria» № 827 vid 14 serpnia 2019 r. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/827-2019-%D0%BF#Text
  12. Dolyna L.F., Kozachyna V.A., Prystynskyi V.V. Monitorynh zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria benz(a)pirenom ta vuhlevodnem. Elektromahnitna sumisnist ta bezpeka na zaliznychnomu transporti. 2013. № 6. S. 91-97. https://doi.org/10.15802/ecsrt2013/51294
  13. Nychyk O.V. Monitorynh dovkillia: Kurs lektsii dlia stud. Napriamu 6.040106 «Ekolohiia, okhorona navkolyshnoho seredovyshcha ta zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia» den. ta zaoch. form navch. / Natsionalnyi universytet kharchovykh tekhnolohii. Kyiv, 2011. 67 s.
  14. Artemchuk V.O. Osnovni problemy optymizatsii merezhi monitorynhu stanu atmosfernoho povitria. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu problem modeliuvannia v enerhetytsi im. H.Ye. Pukhova NAN Ukrainy. 2012. № 64. S. 7-11.
  15. Artemchuk V.O. Klasyfikatsiia zadach optymizatsii merezh monitorynhu stanu atmosfernoho povitria. Modeliuvannia ta informatsiini tekhnolohii. 2013. № 67. S. 10-15.
  16. Artemchuk V.O. Vykorystannia GIS-oriientovanykh servisiv pry optymizatsii merezhi monitorynhu stanu atmosfernoho povitria. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu problem modeliuvannia v enerhetytsi im. H.Ye. Pukhova NAN Ukrainy. 2013. № 69. S. 34-39.
  17. Zhou P., Huang G., Zhang L., Tsang K. F. Wireless sensor network based monitoring system for a large-scale indoor space: data process and supply air allocation optimization. Energy and Buildings. 2015. Vol. 103. P. 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.042
  18. Tang Y., Miao Y., Barnawi A., Alzahrani B., Alotaibi R. & Hwang K. A joint global and local path planning optimization for UAV task scheduling towards crowd air monitoring. Computer Networks. 2021. Vol. 193. P. 107913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. comnet.2021.107913
  19. Hu Z., Bai Z., Bian K., Wang T., Song L. Real-time fine-grained air quality sensing networks in smart city: design, implementation, and optimization. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2019. Vol. 6(5). P. 7526-7542. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT. 2019.2900751
  20. Yuzhong W.A.N.G., Huanqin W.A.N.G., Juntao H.U., Huaqiao G.U.I. Optimization Design of Miniature Air Quality Monitoring System Based on Multi-Sensor Fusion Technology. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics. 2021. Vol. 16(4). P. 349.
  21. Isaienko V., Zaporozhets A., Babikova K., Gulevets D., Savchenko S. Review of methods and means of monitoring the air pollution. Advances in Aerospace Technology. 2019. Vol. 3(80). P. 61-70. http://doi.org/10.18372/2306-1472.80.14275
  22. Zaporozhets A., Babak V., Isaienko V., Babikova K. Analysis of the Air Pollution Monitoring System in Ukraine. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2020. Vol. 298. P. 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48583-2_6
  23. Iatsyshyn A., Artemchuk V., Zaporozhets A., Popov O., Kovach V., Taraduda D. Development of Teaching Methodology in the Field of Environmental Monitoring of Atmosphere. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2021. Vol. 346. P. 121- 139. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69189-9_18
  24. Tyshkevych B., Verbytskyi I. Yak Ukraina vymiriuie zabrudnennia povitria? Ukrain- ska enerhetyka. 2018. URL: https://ua-energy.org/uk/posts/yak-ukraina-vymiriuie-zabrudnennia-povitria
  25. Tyshkevych B., Verbytskyi I. Paltsem v nebo? Yak Ukraina vymiriuie zabrudnen- nia povitria. Mistosite. 2018. URL: https://mistosite.org.ua/ru/articles/paltsem-v-nebo-yak-ukraina-vymiriuie-zabrudnennia-povitria
  26. Dmytryeva E.A., Varlamov E.N., Kvasov V.A., Palahuta O.A. Trebovanyia dyrektyv 50/2008/ES y 107/2004/ES k sety nabliudenyia za kachestvom atmosfernoho vozdukha y otsenka ee sostoianyia v Ukrayne. Ekolohyia y promyshlennost. 2017. № 1. S. 110-114.
  1. Artemchuk V.O. Perspektyvy vykorystannia bezprovidnykh sensornykh merezh. Modeliuvannia ta informatsiini tekhnolohii. 2013. № 68. S. 48-56.
  2. Mokin V.B., Sobko B.Yu., Dratovanyi M.V., Kryzhanovskyi Ye.M., Horiachev H.V. Stvorennia informatsiinoi systemy monitorynhu zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria mista na osnovi tekhnolohii «internetu rechei». Visnyk Vinnytskoho politekhnichnoho instytutu. 2017. № 3. S. 49-58.
  3. Tkachuk K.K., Kanar M.O. Avtomatychna systema monitorynhu zabrudnennia atmosfery promyslovoho raionu v Donetskii oblasti. Heolohiia ta okhorona pratsi. 2015. № 29. S. 86-89.
  4. Bordiuh N.S., Rashchenko A.V., Les A.V. Rozrobka proiektu systemy monitorynhu atmosfernoho povitria. Ekolohichni nauky. 2021. № 2(35). S. 15-19. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2021.eco.2-35.2
  5. Holik Yu.S., Maksiuta N.S. Stvorennia merezhi hromadskoho monitorynhu atmosfernoho povitria ta informuvannia naselennia. Tekhnolohichnyi audyt ta rezervy vyrobnytstva. 2020. № 4(54). S. 36-40. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.210376
  6. Mokin V.B., Dziuniak D.Yu., Bondalietov K.O., Oliinyk V.V. Metod i tekhnolohiia monitorynhu stanu atmosfernoho povitria za dopomohoiu universalnoi informatsiino-vymiriuvalnoi systemy z vykorystanniam mobilnykh prystroiv. Naukovi pratsi Vinnytskoho natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu. 2015. № 4. URL: https://praci.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/praci/article/view/456
  7. Radovenchyk V.M., Ivanenko O.I., Krysenko T.V., Radovechnyk Ya.V. Systemy monitorynhu yakosti povitria v m. Kyievi. Visnyk NTUU«KPI imeni Ihoria Sikorskoho». Seriia: Khimichna inzheneriia, ekolohiia ta resursozberezhennia. 2022. № 1. S. 70-79. https://doi.org/10.20535/2617-9741.1.2022.254161 123. Dhingra S., Madda R. B., Gandomi A. H., Patan R., Daneshmand M. Internet of Things mobile-air pollution monitoring system (IoT-Mobair). IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2019. Vol. 6(3). P. 5577-5584. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2903821
  8. Parmar G., Lakhani S., Chattopadhyay M. K. An IoT based low cost air pollution monitoring system. In 2017 International Conference on Recent Innovations in Signal processing and Embedded Systems (RISE). 2017, October. P. 524-528. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/RISE.2017.8378212
  9. Senthilkumar R., Venkatakrishnan P., Balaji N. Intelligent based novel embedded system based IoT enabled air pollution monitoring system. Microprocessors and Microsystems. 2020. Vol. 77. P. 103172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103172
  10. Sai K. B. K., Subbareddy S. R., Luhach A. K. IOT based air quality monitoring system using MQ135 and MQ7 with machine learning analysis. Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience. 2019. Vol. 20(4). P. 599-606. https://doi.org/10.12694/scpe.v20i4.1561
  11. Gupta H., Bhardwaj D., Agrawal H., Tikkiwal V. A., Kumar A. An IoT based air pollution monitoring system for smart cities. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies and Systems (ICSETS). 2019, February. P. 173- 177. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSETS.2019.8744949
  12. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro vnesennia zmin do Konstytutsii Ukrainy (shchodo stratehichnoho kursu derzhavy na nabuttia povnopravnoho chlenstva Ukrainy v Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi ta v Orhanizatsii Pivnichnoatlantychnoho dohovoru)» vid 7 liutoho 2019 r. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/#19-2680Text
  13. Hryb O.M., Chuhai A.V. Avtomatyzovanyi monitorynh ta otsinka yakosti atmosfernoho povitria. Metodychni vkazivky dlia pidhotovky studentiv za spetsialnostiamy 101 «Ekolohiia» ta 103 «Nauky pro Zemliu» / Odeskyi derzhavnyi ekolohichnyi universytet. 2019. 58 s.
  14. Hegde S., Min K. T., Moore J., Lundrigan P., Patwari N., Collingwood S. et al. Indoor household particulate matter measurements using a network of low-cost sensors. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2020. Vol. 20(2). P. 381-394. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.01.0046
  15. Dacunto P. J., Klepeis N. E., Cheng K. C., Acevedo-Bolton V., Jiang R. T., Repace J. et al. Determining PM 2.5 calibration curves for a low-cost particle monitor: common indoor residential aerosols. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2015. Vol.17(11). P. 1959-1966. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EM00365B
  16. Migos T., Christakis I., Moutzouris K., Stavrakas I. On the Evaluation of Low-Cost PM Sensors for Air Quality Estimation. In 2019 8th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST). 2019, May. P. 1-4. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MOCAST.2019.8742041
  17. Awokola B. I., Okello G., Mortimer K. J., Jewell C. P., Erhart A., Semple, S. Measuring air quality for advocacy in Africa (MA3): feasibility and practicality of longitudinal ambient PM2. 5 measurement using low-cost sensors. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020. Vol. 17(19). P. 7243. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197243
  18. Johnson K. K., Bergin M. H., Russell A. G., Hagler G. S. Field test of several low-cost particulate matter sensors in high and low concentration urban environments. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2018. Vol. 18(3). P. 565. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.10.0418
  19. Khadem M. I., Sgârciu V. Smart sensor nodes for airborne particulate concentration detection. UPB Sci. Bull. Ser. C. 2014. Vol. 76(4). P. 3-12.
  20. Du Y., Wang Q., Sun Q., Zhang T., Li T., Yan B. Assessment of PM2.5 monitoring using MicroPEM: A validation study in a city with elevated PM2.5 levels. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2019. Vol. 171. P. 518-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.002
  21. Cho S. H., Chartier R. T., Mortimer K., Dherani M., Tafatatha T. A personal particulate matter exposure monitor to support household air pollution exposure and health studies. In 2016 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC). 2016, October. P. 817-818. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2016.7857373
  22. Chartier R., Phillips M., Mosquin P., Elledge M., Bronstein K., Nandasena S. et al. A comparative study of human exposures to household air pollution from commonly used cookstoves in Sri Lanka. Indoor air. 2017. Vol. 27(1). P. 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12281
  23. Xie S., Meeker J. R., Perez L., Eriksen W., Localio A., Park H. et al. Feasibility and acceptability of monitoring personal air pollution exposure with sensors for asthma self-management. Asthma research and practice. 2021. Vol. 7(1). P. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40733-021-00079-9
  24. Sousan S., Koehler K., Hallett L., Peters T. M. Evaluation of consumer monitors to measure particulate matter. Journal of aerosol science. 2017. Vol. 107. P. 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.02.013
  25. He R., Han T., Bachman D., Carluccio D. J., Jaeger R., Zhang J. et al. Evaluation of two low-cost PM monitors under different laboratory and indoor conditions. Aerosol science and technology. 2020. Vol. 55(3). P. 316-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02 786826.2020.1851649 https://doi.org/10.1080/02
  26. Cowan K., Kelly T., Coutant B., Riggs K. Met one instruments BAM 1020 particle monitor. Environmental Technology Verification Report, Battelle. Columbus OH. 2001. P. 43201.
  27. Magi B. I., Cupini C., Francis J., Green M., Hauser C. Evaluation of PM2.5 measured in an urban setting using a low-cost optical particle counter and a Federal Equivalent Method Beta Attenuation Monitor. Aerosol Science and Technology. 2020. Vol. 54(2). P. 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1619915
  28. Mohtar Z. A., Faizah N., Yusof F., Ramli N. A., Yahya A. S., Tebal N. Comparison of particulate matter (PM10) monitoring using Beta Attenuation Monitor (BAM) and simple instrument. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2013. P. 3.
  29. Zamora M. L., Rice J., Koehler K. One year evaluation of three low-cost PM2.5 monitors. Atmospheric environment. 2020. Vol. 235. P. 117615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117615
  30. Zikova N., Masiol M., Chalupa D. C., Rich D. Q., Ferro A. R. & Hopke P. K. Estimating hourly concentrations of PM2.5 across a metropolitan area using low-cost particle monitors. Sensors. 2017. Vol. 17(8). P. 1922. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081922
  31. Palmisani J., Di Gilio A., Viana M., de Gennaro G., Ferro A. Indoor air quality evaluation in oncology units at two European hospitals: Low-cost sensors for TVOCs, PM2.5 and CO2 real-time monitoring. Building and Environment. 2021. Vol. 205. P. 108237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108237
  32. Liu X., Hadiatullah H., Zhang X., Hill L. D., White A. H., Schnelle-Kreis J. et al. Analysis of mobile monitoring data from the microAeth® MA200 for measuring changes in black carbon on the roadside in Augsburg. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2021. Vol. 14(7). P. 5139-5151. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5139-2021
  33. Williams R. D., Knibbs L. D. Daily personal exposure to black carbon: a pilot study. Atmospheric Environment. 2016. Vol. 132. P. 296-299 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.023
  34. Craft T. L., Cahill C. F., Walker G. W. Using an unmanned aircraft to observe black carbon aerosols during a prescribed fire at the RxCADRE campaign. In 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). 2014. P. 77-82. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2014.6842241
  35. Devarakonda S., Sevusu P., Liu H., Liu R., Iftode L. & Nath B. Real-time air quality monitoring through mobile sensing in metropolitan areas. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGKDD international workshop on urban computing. 2013. P. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2505821.2505834
  36. Zhao Y., Shepherd T. A., Li H., Xin H. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems-Part I: Monitoring system and indoor air quality. Poultry Science. 2015. Vol. 94(3). P. 518-533. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/peu076
  37. Lerner U., Hirshfeld O., Fishbasin B. Optimal deployment of a heterogeneous air quality sensor network. Journal of Environmental Informatics. 2019. Vol. 34(2). P. 99-107.
  38. Broday D. M., Citi-Sense Project Collaborators. Wireless distributed environmental sensor networks for air pollution measurement-The promise and the current reality. Sensors. 2017. Vol. 17(10). P. 2263. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102263
  39. Thomas G. W., Sousan S., Tatum M., Liu X., Zuidema C., Fitzpatrick M. et al. Low-cost, distributed environmental monitors for factory worker health. Sensors. 2018. Vol. 18(5). P. 1411. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051411
  40. Querol X., Alastuey A., Gangoiti G., Perez N., Lee H. K., Eun H. R. et al. Phenomenology of summer ozone episodes over the Madrid Metropolitan Area, central Spain. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2018. Vol. 18(9). P. 6511-6533. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6511-2018
  41. Vettikkat L., Sinha V., Datta S., Kumar A., Hakkim H., Yadav P. et al. Significant emissions of dimethyl sulfide and monoterpenes by big-leaf mahogany trees: discovery of a missing dimethyl sulfide source to the atmospheric environment. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2020. Vol. 20(1). P. 375-389. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-375-2020
  42. Aziz H. A., Awang N. R., Amin M. F. M., Junaidi N. F. M. Ground Level Ozone Fluctuational Characteristics within Two Industrial Areas in Malaysia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020. Vol. 549. No. 1. P. 012002. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/549/1/012002
  43. Collier-Oxandale A., Feenstra B., Papapostolou V., Zhang H., Kuang M., Der Boghossian B. et al. Field and laboratory performance evaluations of 28 gas-phase air quality sensors by the AQ-SPEC program. Atmospheric Environment. 2020. Vol. 220. P. 117092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117092
  44. Stolle L., Nalamasu R., Rodenbeck R., Davidson K., Smarelli C., Rosko S. et al. Ozone: A Novel Sterilizer for Personal Protective Equipment. Cureus. 2021. Vol. 13(9). Е18228. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18228
  45. Zandbergen D., Uitermark J. In search of the smart citizen: Republican and cybernetic citizenship in the smart city. Urban Studies. 2020. Vol. 57(8). P. 1733-1748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019847410
  46. Mihăiţă A. S., Dupont L., Chery O., Camargo M., Cai C. Evaluating air quality by combining stationary, smart mobile pollution monitoring and data-driven modelling. Journal of cleaner production. 2019. Vol. 221. P. 398-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.179
  47. Khedo K. K., Shenoy P., Zeadally K., Awotar K., Ramdani L. A Vehicular Internet of Things (IoT) System for High-Granularity Air Quality Monitoring in Smart Cities. Smart Technologies for Smart Cities. 2020. P. 111-133. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39986-3_6
  1. Esposito E., Salvato M., Vito S. D., Fattoruso G., Castell N., Karatzas K. et al. Assessing the Relocation Robustness of on Field Calibrations for Air Quality Monitoring Devices. In AISEM Annual Conference on Sensors and Microsystems. 2017. P. 303- 312. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66802-4_38
  2. Carruthers D., Stidworthy A., Clarke D., Dicks J., Jones R., Leslie I. et al. Urban emission inventory optimisation using sensor data, an urban air quality model and inversion techniques. International Journal of Environment and Pollution. 2019. Vol. 66(4). P. 252-266. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEP.2019.104878
  3. Castell N., Schneider P., Vogt M., Dauge F. R., Lahoz W. & Bartonova A. Can low- cost air quality sensors help to monitor air pollution in cities? In 11th International Conference on Air Quality Science and Application. 2018. 290 с. https://bit.ly/3SNx7Xv
  4. McKercher G. R., Salmond J. A., Vanos J. K. Characteristics and applications of small, portable gaseous air pollution monitors. Environmental Pollution. 2017. Vol. 223. P. 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.045
  5. Peters D. R., Popoola O. A., Jones R. L., Martin N. A., Mills J., Fonseca E. R. et al. Evaluating uncertainty in sensor networks for urban air pollution insights. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2022. Vol. 15(2). P. 321-334. https://doi.org/10. 5194/amt-15-321-2022
  6. Kumar P., Morawska L., Martani C., Biskos G., Neophytou M., Di Sabatino S. et al. The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities. Environment international. 2015 Vol. 75. P. 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.019
  7. Hagler G. S. W., Solomon P. A., Hunt S. W. New technology for low-cost, real-time air monitoring. EM: Air and Waste Management Association’s Magazine for Environ- mental Managers; Air & Waste Management Association. Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 2014.
  8. Rai A. C., Kumar P., Pilla F., Skouloudis A. N., Di Sabatino S., Ratti C. et al. End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring. Science of The Total Environment. 2017. Vol. 607. P. 691-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2017.06.266
  9. Williams D. E. Low cost sensor networks: How do we know the data are reliable? ACSsensors.2019.Vol. 4(10).P. 2558-2565. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b01455
  10. Barbour N., Schmidt G. Inertial sensor technology trends. IEEE Sensors journal. 2001. Vol. 1(4). P. 332-339. https://doi.org/10.1109/7361.983473
  11. Megerian S., Koushanfar F., Potkonjak M., Srivastava M.B. Worst and best-case coverage in sensor networks. IEEE transactions on mobile computing. 2005. Vol. 4(1). P. 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1109/7361.983473
  12. Kumar P., Martani C., Morawska L., Norford L., Choudhary R., Bel M. et al. Indoor air quality and energy management through real-time sensing in commercial buildings. Energy and Buildings. 2016. Vol. 111. P. 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.11.037
  13. Kumar P., Skouloudis A. N., Bell M., Viana M., Carotta M. C., Biskos G. et al. Real- time sensors for indoor air monitoring and challenges ahead in deploying them to urban buildings. Science of the Total Environment. 2016. Vol. 560. P. 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.032
  1. Báthory C., Dobó Z., Garami A., Palotás Á., Tóth P. Low-cost monitoring of atmospheric PM-development and testing. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022. Vol. 304. P. 114158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114158
  2. Ashoori E., Parsnejad S., Yin H., Figueroa J., Sepúlveda N. & Mason A. J. A Low- Cost Liquid-Based Capacitive Sensor for PM 2.5 Monitoring. In 2021 IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS). 2021. P. 907-910. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSCAS47672.2021.9531893
  3. Castell N., Dauge F. R., Schneider P., Vogt M., Lerner U., Fishbain B. et al. Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? Environment international. 2017. Vol. 99. P. 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.007
  4. Karagulian F., Barbiere M., Kotsev A., Spinelle L., Gerboles M., Lagler F. et al. Review of the performance of low-cost sensors for air quality monitoring. Atmosphere. 2019. Vol. 10(9). P. 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10090506
  5. Spinelle L., Gerboles M., Kok G., Persijn S., Sauerwald T. Review of portable and low- cost sensors for the ambient air monitoring of benzene and other volatile organic compounds. Sensors. 2017. Vol. 17(7). P. 1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17071520
  6. Candia A., Represa S.N., Giuliani D., Luengo M.Á., Porta A.A. & Marrone L.A. Solutions for SmartCities: proposal of a monitoring system of air quality based on a LoRaWAN network with low-cost sensors. In 2018 Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Informática y Desarrollos de Investigación (CACIDI). 2018, November. P. 1-6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CACIDI.2018.8584183
  7. Morawska L., Thai P.K., Liu X., Asumadu-Sakyi A., Ayoko G., Bartonova A. et al. Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone? Environment international. 2018. Vol. 116. P. 286-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.018
  8. Badura M., Batog P., Drzeniecka-Osiadacz A., Modzel P. Evaluation of low-cost sensors for ambient PM2.5 monitoring. Journal of Sensors. 2018. Р. 5096540. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5096540
  9. Brienza S., Galli A., Anastasi G., Bruschi P. A low-cost sensing system for cooperative air quality monitoring in urban areas. Sensors. 2015. Vol. 15(6). P. 12242-12259. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150612242
  10. Lewis A., Peltier W., Richard von Schneidemesser E. Low-cost sensors for the measurement of atmospheric composition: overview of topic and future applications. Research Report. World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Geneva, Switzerland. 2018.
  11. Mahajan S., Kumar P. Evaluation of low-cost sensors for quantitative personal exposure monitoring. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020. Vol. 57. P. 102076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102076
  12. Muñoz-Huerta R.F., Guevara-Gonzalez R.G., Contreras-Medina L.M., Torres-Pacheco I., Prado-Olivarez J. & Ocampo-Velazquez R.V. A review of methods for sensing the nitrogen status in plants: advantages, disadvantages and recent advances. Sensors. 2013. Vol. 13(8). P. 10823-10843. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130810823
  13. Liu S., Xia C., Zhao Z. A low-power real-time air quality monitoring system using LPWAN based on LoRa. In 2016 13th IEEE International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology (ICSICT). 2016, October. P. 379-381. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSICT.2016.7998927
  14. Phala K.S.E., Kumar A., Hancke G.P. Air quality monitoring system based on ISO/ IEC/IEEE 21451 standards. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2016. Vol. 16(12). P. 5037-5045. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2016.2555935
  15. Alberti G., Zanoni C., Magnaghi L. R., Biesuz R. Disposable and low-cost colorimetric sensors for environmental analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020. Vol. 17(22). P. 8331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228331
  16. Lewis A.C., Lee J.D., Edwards P.M., Shaw M.D., Evans M.J., Moller et al. Evaluating the performance of low-cost chemical sensors for air pollution research. Faraday discussions. 2016. Vol. 189. P. 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5FD00201J
  17. Schieweck A., Uhde E., Salthammer T., Salthammer L. C., Morawska L., Mazaheri M. et al. Smart homes and the control of indoor air quality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018. Vol. 94. P. 705-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.057
  18. Thu M.Y., Htun W., Aung Y.L., Shwe P.E.E., Tun N.M. Smart air quality monitoring system with LoRaWAN. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System (IOTAIS). 2018, November. P. 10-15. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTAIS.2018.8600904
  19. Kumar A., Singh I. P., Sud S. K. Energy efficient and low-cost indoor environment monitoring system based on the IEEE 1451 standard. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2011. Vol. 11(10). P. 2598-2610. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2011.2148171
  20. Mois G., Folea S., Sanislav T. Analysis of three IoT-based wireless sensors for environmental monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 2017. Vol. 66(8). P. 2056-2064. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2017.2677619
  21. Lowther S. D., Jones K. C., Wang X., Whyatt J. D., Wild O. & Booker D. Particulate matter measurement indoors: a review of metrics, sensors, needs, and applications. Environmental Science & Technology. 2019. Vol. 53(20). P. 11644-11656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03425
  22. Lan H., Hartonen K., Riekkola M. L. Miniaturised air sampling techniques for analysis of volatile organic compounds in air. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2020. Vol. 126. P. 115873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.115873
  23. Sokhi R.S., Moussiopoulos N., Baklanov A., Bartzis J., Coll I., Finardi S. et al. Advances in air quality research-current and emerging challenges. Atmospheric chemistry and physics.2022. Vol. 22(7). P. 4615-4703. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2014.2349073
  24. Capone S., Forleo A., Francioso L., Rella R., Siciliano P., Spadavecchia J. et al. Solid state gas sensors: state of the art and future activities. Journal of optoelectronics and Advanced Materials. 2003. Vol. 5(5). P. 1335-1348.
  25. Quan V.M., Gupta G.S., Mukhopadhyay S. Review of sensors for greenhouse climate monitoring. In 2011 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium. 2011, February. P. 112-118. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS.2011.5739816
  26. Simonds M., Xiao H., Levine S. P. Optical remote sensing for air pollutants-review. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 1994. Vol. 55(10). P. 953-965. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119491018466
  27. Snyder E.G., Watkins T.H., Solomon P.A., Thoma E.D., Williams R.W., Hagler G.S. et al. The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring. Environmental science & technology. 2013. Vol. 47(20). P. 11369-11377. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4022602
  28. Ihokura K., Watson J. The stannic oxide gas sensor: principles and applications. CRC press. Boca Raton, 2017. 208 р.
  29. Postolache O.A., Pereira J.D., Girao P.S. Smart sensors network for air quality monitoring applications. IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement. 2009. Vol. 58(9). P. 3253-3262. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2009.2022372
  30. Yi W.Y., Lo K.M., Mak T., Leung K.S., Leung Y. & Meng M.L. A survey of wireless sensor network based air pollution monitoring systems. Sensors. 2015. Vol. 15(12). P. 31392-31427. https://doi.org/10.3390/s151229859
  31. Dinh T.V., Choi I.Y., Son Y.S., Kim J.C. A review on non-dispersive infrared gas sensors: Improvement of sensor detection limit and interference correction. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2016. Vol. 231. P. 529-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.03.040
  32. Kumar A., Singh A., Kumar A., Singh M. K., Mahanta P. & Mukhopadhyay S.C. Sensing technologies for monitoring intelligent buildings: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2018. Vol. 18(12). P. 4847-4860. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2018.2829268
  33. Ando M., Biju V., Shigeri Y. Development of technologies for sensing ozone in ambient air. Analytical Sciences. 2018. Vol. 34(3). P. 263-271. https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.34.263
  34. Koehler K.A., Peters T.M. New methods for personal exposure monitoring for airborne particles. Current environmental health reports. 2015. Vol. 2(4). P. 399-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-015-0070-z
  35. Castell N., Viana M., Minguillón M.C., Guerreiro C., Querol X. Real-world application of new sensor technologies for air quality monitoring. ETC/ACM Technical Paper. 2013. Vol. 6. P. 34.
  36. Penza M., EuNetAir Consortium. COST Action TD1105: Overview of sensor-systems for air-quality monitoring. Procedia Engineering. 2014. Vol. 87. P. 1370-1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.698
  37. Aleixandre M., Gerboles M. Review of small commercial sensors for indicative monitoring of ambient gas. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2012. Vol. 30. Р. 10.3303.
  38. Bourgeois W., Romain A. C., Nicola J., Stuetz R. M. The use of sensor arrays for environmental monitoring: interests and limitations. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 2003. Vol. 5(6). P. 852-860. https://doi.org/10.1039/B307905H
  39. Mukhopadhyay S.C. (Ed.). Smart sensing technology for agriculture and environmental monitoring. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27638-5
  1. Feinberg S., Williams R., Hagler G. S., Rickard J., Brown R., Garve D. et al. Long- term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado. Atmospheric measurement techniques. 2018. Vol. 11(8). P. 4605-4615. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018
  2. Penza M., Suriano D., Pfister V., Prato M., Cassano G. Urban air quality monitoring with networked low-cost sensor-systems. In Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings. 2017. Vol. 1. № 4. P. 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1040573
  3. Liang C.J., Yu P.R. Assessment and Improvement of Two Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor Systems by Using Spatial Interpolation Data from Air Quality Monitoring Stations. Atmosphere. 2021. Vol. 12(3). P. 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12030300
  4. Clements A.L., Griswold W.G., Rs, A., Johnston J.E., Herting M.M., Thorson J. et al. Low-cost air quality monitoring tools: from research to practice (a workshop summary). Sensors. 2017. Vol. 17(11). P. 2478. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17112478
  5. Hunter G., Xu J., Biaggi-Labiosa A., Ward B., Dutta P. & Liu C.C. Smart sensor systems for spacecraft fire detection and air quality monitoring. In 41st International Conference on Environmental Systems. 2011, July. P. 5021. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-5021
  6. Cheng Y., Li X., Li Z., Jiang S., Li Y., Jia J. et al. AirCloud: A cloud-based air-quality monitoring system for everyone. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. 2014, November. P. 251-265. https://doi.org/10.1145/2668332.2668346
  7. White R.M., Paprotny I., Doering F., Cascio W.E., Solomon P.A. & Gundel L.A. Sensors and ‘apps’ for community-based atmospheric monitoring. EM Air Waste Manag. Assoc. Mag. Environ. Manag. 2012. Vol. 5. P. 36-40.
  8. Zhou X., Lee S., Xu Z., Yoon J. Recent progress on the development of chemosensors for gases. Chemical Reviews. 2015. Vol. 115(15). P. 7944-8000. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500567r
  9. Frank J., Meixner H. Sensor system for indoor air monitoring using semiconducting metal oxides and IR-absorption. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2001. Vol. 78(1-3). P. 298-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00829-2
  10. Jiao W., Hagler G., Williams R., Sharpe R., Brown R., Garver D. et al. Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluation of low-cost sensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern United States. Atmospheric measurement techniques. 2016. Vol. 9 (11). P. 5281-5292. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5281-2016
  11. Chapman J., Truong V.K., Elbourne A., Gangadoo S., Cheeseman S., Rajapaksha P. et al. Combining chemometrics and sensors: Toward new applications in monito- ring and environmental analysis. Chemical Reviews. 2020. Vol. 120(13). P. 6048- 6069. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00616
  12. Rassaei L., Marken F., Sillanpää M., Amiri M., Cirtiu C. M. & Sillanpää M. Nanoparticles in electrochemical sensors for environmental monitoring. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2011. Vol. 30(11). P. 1704-1715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2011.05.009
  13. Kumar A., Gurjar B. R. Low-cost sensors for air quality monitoring in developing countries-a critical view. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution. 2019. Vol. 16(2). P. 65-70. https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW190021
  14. Piedrahita R., Xiang Y., Masson N., Ortega J., Collier A., Jiang Y. Li et al. The next generation of low-cost personal air quality sensors for quantitative exposure monitoring. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2014. Vol. 7(10). P. 3325-3336. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3325-2014
  15. Seto E., Carvlin G., Austin E., Shirai J., Bejarano E., Lugo H. et al. Next-generation community air quality sensors for identifying air pollution episodes. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019. Vol. 16 (18). P. 3268. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183268
  16. Caubel J. J., Cados T. E., Kirchstetter T. W. A new black carbon sensor for dense air quality monitoring networks. Sensors. 2018. Vol. 18 (3). P. 738. https://doi.org/10. 3390/s18030738
  17. Guo H., Xiao G., Mrad N., Yao J. Fiber optic sensors for structural health monitoring of air platforms. Sensors. 2011. Vol. 11(4). P. 3687-3705. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110403687
  18. Pillarisetti A., Allen T., Ruiz-Mercado I., Edwards R., Chowdhury Z., Garland C. et al. Small, smart, fast, and cheap: microchip-based sensors to estimate air pollution exposures in rural households. Sensors. 2017. Vol. 17 (8). P. 1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081879
  19. Polidori A., Papapostolou V., Feenstra B., Zhang H. Field evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2017. 11 р.
  20. Potyrailo R.A. Multivariable sensors for ubiquitous monitoring of gases in the era of internet of things and industrial internet. Chemical reviews. 2016. Vol. 116 (19). P. 11877-11923. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00187
  21. Jiang Q., Kresin F., Bregt A.K., Kooistra L., Pareschi E., Van Putten E. et al. Citizen sensing for improved urban environmental monitoring. Journal of Sensors. 2016. Р. 5656245. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5656245
  22. Sekhar P.K., Brosha E.L., Mukundan R., Garzon F. Chemical sensors for environmental monitoring and homeland security. The Electrochemical Society Interface. 2010. Vol. 19 (4). P. 35. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.F04104if
  23. Chow J.C., Watson J.G., Lowenthal D.H., Richards L.W. Comparability between PM2. 5 and particle light scattering measurements. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2002. Vol. 79 (1). P. 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020047307117
  24. Sioutas C., Kim S., Chang M., Terrell L.L., Gong Jr H. Field evaluation of a modified DataRAM MIE scattering monitor for real-time PM2.5 mass concentration measurements. Atmospheric Environment. 2000. Vol. 34 (28). P. 4829-4838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00244-2
  25. Gu F., Yang J., Bian B., He A. Information entropy characteristic of the light scattering signal amplitude distribution of aerosols. In Optical Design and Testing III. 2007, November. Vol. 6834. P. 68343G. International Society for Optics and Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.757582
  26. Quintana P.J., Samimi B.S., Kleinman M.T., Liu L.J., Soto K., Warner G.Y. et al. Evaluation of a real-time passive personal particle monitor in fi ed site residential indoor and ambient measurements. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 2000. Vol. 10 (5). P. 437-445. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500105
  27. Thomas A., Gebhart J. Correlations between gravimetry and light scattering photometry for atmospheric aerosols. Atmospheric Environment. 1994. Vol. 28 (5). P. 935- 938. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90251-8
  28. Northcross A.L., Edwards R.J., Johnson M.A., Wang Z.M., Zhu K., Allen T. et al. A low-cost particle counter as a real time fine-particle mass monitor. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2013. Vol. 15 (2). P. 433-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90251-8 https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EM30568B
  29. Kumar V., Sahu M. Evaluation of nine machine learning regression algorithms for calibration of low-cost PM2.5 sensor. Journal of Aerosol Science. 2021. Vol. 157. P. 105809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105809
  30. Budde M., Leiner S., Köpke M., Riesterer J., Riedel T. & Beigl M. Fein Phone: Low- cost smartphone camera-based 2D particulate matter sensor. Sensors. 2019. Vol. 19 (3), P. 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19030749
  31. Sousan S., Koehler K., Thomas G., Park J. H., Hillman M., Halterman A. et al. Inter- comparison of low-cost sensors for measuring the mass concentration of occupational aerosols. Aerosol Science and Technology. 2016. Vol. 50 (5). P. 462-473 https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1162901
  32. López F., De Frutos J., González A. M., Navarro A. Integrated optical filters for infrared electrooptical gas sensors. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 1992. Vol. 6 (1-3). P. 170-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4005(92)80051-X
  33. Wang H., Lenz H., Szabo A., Bamberger J., Hanebeck U. D. WLAN-based pedestrian tracking using particle filters and low-cost MEMS sensors. In 2007 4th workshop on positioning, navigation and communication. 2007, March. P. 1-7. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WPNC.2007.353604
  34. Misas C.J., Lopez-Higuera J.M., Lopez-Amo M. Adaptive filters applied to the interrogation of photonic sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2006. Vol. 6 (3). P. 748-754. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2006.874035
  35. Wang X., Li T., Sun S., Corchado J.M. A survey of recent advances in particle filters and remaining challenges for multitarget tracking. Sensors. 2017. Vol. 17 (12). P. 2707. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17122707
  36. Kang D.H., Kim N.K., Kang H.W. Hybrid structure of a ZnO nanowire array on a PVDF nanofiber membrane/nylon mesh for use in smart filters: photoconductive PM filters. Applied Sciences. 2021. Vol. 11 (17). P. 8006. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178006
  37. Alfano B., Barretta L., Del Giudice A., De Vito S., Di Francia G., Esposito E. et al. A review of low-cost particulate matter sensors from the developers’ perspectives. Sensors. 2020. Vol. 20 (23). P. 6819. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236819
  38. Jovašević-Stojanović M., Bartonova A., Topalović D., Lazović I., Pokrić B. & Ristovski Z. On the use of small and cheaper sensors and devices for indicative citizen-based monitoring of respirable particulate matter. Environmental Pollution. 2015. Vol. 206. P. 696-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.035
  39. Su X., Sutarlie L., Loh X.J. Sensors and analytical technologies for air quality: Particulate matters and bioaerosols. Chemistry-An Asian Journal. 2020. Vol. 15 (24). P. 4241-4255. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202001051
  40. Pope F. D., Gatari M., Ng’ang’a D., Poynter A., Blake R. Airborne particulate matter monitoring in Kenya using calibrated low-cost sensors. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2018. Vol. 18 (20). P. 15403-15418. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15403-2018
  41. Liang L. Calibrating low-cost sensors for ambient air monitoring: Techniques, trends, and challenges. Environmental Research. 2021. Vol. 197. P. 111163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111163
  42. Dierick F., Buisseret F., Eggermont S. Low-Cost Sensors and Biological Signals. Sensors. 2021. Vol. 21 (4). P. 1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041482
  43. Kang Y., Aye L., Ngo T. D., Zhou J. Performance evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors: A review. Science of Th Total Environment. 2022. Vol. 818. P. 151769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151769
  44. Penza M. Low-cost sensors for outdoor air quality monitoring. Advanced Nanomaterials for Inexpensive Gas Microsensors. 2020. P. 235-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814827-3.00012-8
  45. Giordano M.R., Malings C., Pandis S.N., Presto A.A., McNeill V. F., Westervelt D.M. et al. From low-cost sensors to high-quality data: A summary of challenges and best practices for effectively calibrating low-cost particulate matter mass sensors. Journal of Aerosol Science. 2021. Vol. 158. P. 105833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105833
  46. Frederickson L.B., Lim S., Russell H.S., Kwiatkowski S., Bonomaully J., Schmidt J.A. et al. Monitoring excess exposure to air pollution for professional drivers in London using low-cost sensors. Atmosphere. 2020. Vol. 11 (7). P. 749 https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11070749
  47. Sayahi T., Butterfield A., Kelly K.E. Long-term field evaluation of the Plantower PMS low-cost particulate matter sensors. Environmental pollution. 2019. Vol. 245. P. 932-940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.065
  48. Levy Zamora M., Xiong F., Gentner D., Kerkez B., Kohrman-Glaser J. & Koehler K. Field and laboratory evaluations of the low-cost plantower particulate matter sensor. Environmental science & technology. 2018. Vol. 53 (2). P. 838-849. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05174
  49. Zou Y., Clark J.D., May A.A. Laboratory evaluation of the effects of particle size and composition on the performance of integrated devices containing Plantower particle sensors. Aerosol Science and Technology. 2021. Vol. 55 (7). P. 848-858. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2021.1905148
  50. Caquilpán P.V., Aros G.G., Elgueta A.S., Díaz S.R., Sepúlveda K.G. & Sierralta J.C. Advantages and challenges of the implementation of a low-cost particulate matter monitoring system as a decision-making tool. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2019. Vol. 191 (11). P. 1-20. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7875-4
  51. Yang C.T., Chen H.W., Chang E.J., Kristiani E., Nguyen K.L.P. & Chang J.S. Current advances and future challenges of AIoT applications in particulate matters (PM) monitoring and control. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021. Vol. 419. P. 126442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126442
  52. Duvall R.M., Long R.W., Beaver M.R., Kronmiller K.G., Wheeler M.L. & Szykman J.J. Performance evaluation and community application of low-cost sensors for ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Sensors. 2016. Vol. 16 (10). P. 1698. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16101698
  53. Olivares G., Edwards S. The Outdoor Dust Information Node (ODIN)-development and performance assessment of a low-cost ambient dust sensor. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions. 2015. Vol. 8 (7). P. 7511-7533. https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-8-7511-2015
  54. Vivacqua R., Vassallo R., Martins F. A low-cost sensors approach for accurate vehicle localization and autonomous driving application. Sensors. 2017. Vol. 17 (10). P. 2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102359
  55. Saeedi S., El-Sheimy N. Activity recognition using fusion of low-cost sensors on a smartphone for mobile navigation application. Micromachines. 2015. Vol. 6 (8). P. 1100-1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi6081100
  56. Bernas M., Płaczek B., Korski W., Loska P., Smyła J. & Szymała P. A survey and comparison of low-cost sensing technologies for road traffic monitoring. Sensors. 2018. Vol. 18 (10). P. 3243. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18103243
  57. Schneider P., Castell N., Vogt M., Dauge F.R., Lahoz W.A. & Bartonova A. Mapping urban air quality in near real-time using observations from low-cost sensors and model information. Environment international. 2017. Vol. 106. P. 234-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.05.005
  58. Popa A., Hnatiuc M., Paun M., Geman, O., Hemanth D.J., Dorcea D. et al. An intelligent IoT-based food quality monitoring approach using low-cost sensors. Symmetry. 2019. Vol. 11 (3). P. 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030374
  59. Sørensen L.Y., Jacobsen L.T., Hansen J.P. Low cost and flexible UAV deployment of sensors. Sensors. 2017. Vol. 17 (1). P. 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010154
  60. Lim C.C., Kim H., Vilcassim M.R., Thurston G.D., Gordon T., Chen L. C. et al. Map- ping urban air quality using mobile sampling with low-cost sensors and machine learning in Seoul, South Korea. Environment international. 2019. Vol. 131. P. 105022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105022
  61. Bigi A., Mueller M., Grange S.K., Ghermandi G., Hueglin C. Performance of NO, NO2 low cost sensors and three calibration approaches within a real world application. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2018. Vol. 11 (6). P. 3717-3735. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3717-2018
  62. Malings C., Tanzer R., Hauryliuk A., Kumar S.P., Zimmerman N., Kara L.B. et al. Development of a general calibration model and long-term performance evaluation of low-cost sensors for air pollutant gas monitoring. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2019. Vol. 12 (2). P. 903-920. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-903-2019
  63. Zaidan M.A., Motlagh N.H., Fung P.L., Lu D., Timonen H., Kuula J. et al. Intelligent calibration and virtual sensing for integrated low-cost air quality sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2020. Vol. 20 (22). P. 13638-13652. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.3010316
  1. Hasenfratz D., Saukh O., Thiele L. On-the-fly calibration of low-cost gas sensors. In European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks. 2012, February. P. 228-244. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28169-3_15
  2. Venkatraman Jagatha J., Klausnitzer A., Chacón-Mateos M., Laquai B., Nieuwkoop E., van der Mark P. et al. Calibration method for particulate matter low-cost sensors used in ambient air quality monitoring and research. Sensors. 2021. Vol. 21 (12). P. 3960. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21123960
  3. Badura M., Batog P., Drzeniecka-Osiadacz A., Modzel P. Regression methods in the calibration of low-cost sensors for ambient particulate matter measurements. SN Applied Sciences. 2019. Vol. 1 (6). P. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0630-1
  4. Penza M., Suriano D., Villani M.G., Spinelle L., Gerboles M. Towards air quality indices in smart cities by calibrated low-cost sensors applied to networks. In SENSORS. 2014, November. P. 2012-2017. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2014.6985429
  5. Kosmopoulos G., Salamalikis V., Pandis S.N., Yannopoulos P., Bloutsos A.A. & Ka- zantzidis A. Low-cost sensors for measuring airborne particulate matter: Field evaluation and calibration at a South-Eastern European site. Science of The Total Environment. 2020. Vol. 748. P. 141396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141396
  6. Zusman M., Schumacher C.S., Gassett A.J., Spalt E.W., Austin E., Larson T.V. et al. Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multicity epidemiological study. Environment international. 2020. Vol. 134. P. 105329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105329
  7. Liu D., Zhang Q., Jiang J., Chen D.R. Performance calibration of low-cost and portable particular matter (PM) sensors. Journal of Aerosol Science. 2017. Vol. 112. P. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.05.011
  8. Lin Y., Dong W., Chen Y. Calibrating low-cost sensors by a two-phase learning approach for urban air quality measurement. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. 2018. Vol. 2 (1). P. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3191750
  9. Spinelle L., Gerboles M., Villani M.G., Aleixandre M., Bonavitacola F. Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost available sensors for air quality monitoring. Part A: Ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2015. Vol. 215. P. 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.03.031
  10. Spinelle L., Gerboles M., Villani M.G., Aleixandre M., Bonavitacola F. Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost commercially available sensors for air quality monitoring. Part B: NO, CO and CO2. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2017. Vol. 238. P. 706-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.036
  11. Markert J.F., Budde M., Schindler G., Klug M., Beigl M. Private rendezvous-based calibration of low-cost sensors for participatory environmental sensing. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on IoT in Urban Space. 2016, May. P. 82-85. https://doi.org/10.1145/2962735.2962754
  12. Müller M., Graf P., Meyer J., Pentina A., Brunner D., Perez-Cruz F. et al. Integration and calibration of non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) CO2 low-cost sensors and their operation in a sensor network covering Switzerland. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2020. Vol. 13 (7). P. 3815-3834. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3815-2020
  13. Aguiar E.F.K., Roig H.L., Mancini L. H., de Carvalho E.N.C.B. Low-cost sensors calibration for monitoring air quality in the federal district-Brazil. Journal of environmental protection. 2015. Vol. 6 (02). P. 173. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.62019
  14. Van Zoest V., Osei F.B., Stein A., Hoek G. Calibration of low-cost NO2 sensors in an urban air quality network. Atmospheric environment. 2019. Vol. 210. P. 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.04.048
  15. Miskell G., Salmond J.A., Williams D.E. Solution to the problem of calibration of low-cost air quality measurement sensors in networks. ACS sensors. 2018. Vol. 3(4). P. 832-843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.8b00074
  16. Kim H., Müller M., Henne S., Hüglin C. Long-term behavior and stability of calibration models for NO and NO2 low-cost sensors. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2022. Vol. 15 (9). P. 2979-2992. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2979-2022
  17. Holstius D.M., Pillarisetti A., Smith K.R., Seto E.J.A.M.T. Field calibrations of a low- cost aerosol sensor at a regulatory monitoring site in California. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2014. Vol. 7(4). P. 1121-1131. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1121-2014
  18. Zimmerman N., Presto A.A., Kumar S.P., Gu J., Hauryliuk A., Robinson E.S. et al. A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2018. Vol. 11 (1). P. 291-313. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-291-2018
  19. Sayahi T., Kaufman D., Becnel T., Kaur K., Butterfield A.E., Collingwood S. et al. Development of a calibration chamber to evaluate the performance of low-cost particulate matter sensors. Environmental Pollution. 2019. Vol. 255. P. 113131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113131
  20. Jiang Y., Zhu X., Chen C., Ge Y., Wang W., Zhao Z. et al. On-field test and data calibration of a low-cost sensor for fine particles exposure assessment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2021. Vol. 211. P. 111958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111958
  21. Hua J., Zhang Y., de Foy B., Mei X., Shang J., Zhang Y. et al. Improved PM2.5 concentration estimates from low-cost sensors using calibration models categorized by relative humidity. Aerosol Science and Technology. 2021. Vol. 55 (5). P. 600-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2021.1873911
  22. Levy Zamora M., Buehler C., Lei H., Datta A., Xiong F., Gentner D.R. et al. Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network. ACS ES&T Engineering. 2022. Р. 780-793. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.1c00367
  23. Lee H., Kang J., Kim S., Im Y., Yoo S. & Lee D. Long-term evaluation and calibration of low-cost particulate matter (PM) sensor. Sensors. 2020. Vol. 20 (13). P. 3617. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133617
  24. Barcelo-Ordinas J.M., Ferrer-Cid P., Garcia-Vidal J., Ripoll A., Viana M. Distributed multi-scale calibration of low-cost ozone sensors in wireless sensor networks. Sensors. 2019. Vol. 19 (11). P. 2503. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020363
  25. Qin X., Hou L., Gao J., Si S. The evaluation and optimization of calibration methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors: Inter-comparison between fixed and mobile methods. Science of The Total Environment. 2020. Vol. 715. P. 136791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136791
  26. Kureshi R.R., Mishra B.K., Th ker D., John R., Walker A., Simpson S. et al. Data-Driven Techniques for Low-Cost Sensor Selection and Calibration for the Use Case of Air Quality Monitoring. Sensors. 2022. Vol. 22 (3). P. 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031093
  27. Topalović D.B., Davidović M.D., Jovanović M., Bartonova A., Ristovski Z. & Jovašević-Stojanović M. In search of an optimal in-fi calibration method of low-cost gas sensors for ambient air pollutants: Comparison of linear, multilinear and artificial neural network approaches. Atmospheric Environment. 2019. Vol. 213. P. 640-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.028
  28. Concas F., Mineraud J., Lagerspetz E., Varjonen S., Liu X., Puolamäki K. et al. Low- cost outdoor air quality monitoring and sensor calibration: A survey and critical analysis. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN). 2021. Vol. 17 (2). P. 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446005
  29. Chen C.C., Kuo C.T., Chen S.Y., Lin C. H., Chue J.J., Hsieh Y.J. et al. Calibration of low-cost particle sensors by using machine-learning method. In 2018 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems (APCCAS). 2018, October. P. 111-114. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/APCCAS.2018.8605619
  30. Ferrer-Cid P., Barcelo-Ordinas J.M., Garcia-Vidal J., Ripoll A., Viana M. A comparative study of calibration methods for low-cost ozone sensors in IoT platforms. IEEE Internet of Th s Journal. 2019. Vol. 6 (6). P. 9563-9571. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2929594
  31. Wallace L., Bi J., Ott W.R., Sarnat J., Liu Y. Calibration of low-cost PurpleAir outdoor monitors using an improved method of calculating PM2. 5. Atmospheric Environment. 2021. Vol. 256. P. 118432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118432
  32. Maag B., Zhou Z., Thiele L. A survey on sensor calibration in air pollution monitoring deployments. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2018. Vol. 5 (6). P. 4857-4870. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2853660
  33. Sahu R., Nagal A., Dixit K.K., Unnibhavi H., Mantravadi S., Nair S. et al. Robust statistical calibration and characterization of portable low-cost air quality monitoring sensors to quantify real-time O3 and NO2 concentrations in diverse environments. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2021. Vol. 14 (1). P. 37-52. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-37-2021
  34. Dallo F., Zannoni D., Gabrieli J., Cristofanelli P., Calzolari F., de Blasi F. et al. Calibration and assessment of electrochemical low-cost sensors in remote alpine harsh environments. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2021. Vol. 14 (9). P. 6005-6021. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6005-2021
  35. Barcelo-Ordinas J.M., Garcia-Vidal J., Doudou M., Rodrigo-Muñoz S. & Cerezo- Llavero A. Calibrating low-cost air quality sensors using multiple arrays of sensors. In 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). 2018, April. P. 1-6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC.2018.8377051
  36. Chu H.J., Ali M.Z., He Y.C. Spatial calibration and PM2.5 mapping of low-cost air quality sensors. Scientific reports. 2020. Vol. 10 (1). P. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79064-w
  1. Veiga T., Munch-Ellingsen A., Papastergiopoulos C., Tzovaras D., Kalamaras I., Bach K. et al. From a low-cost air quality sensor network to decision support services: Steps towards data calibration and service development. Sensors. 2021. Vol. 21 (9). P. 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093190
  2. Patra S.S., Ramsisaria R., Du R., Wu T., Boor B.E. A machine learning field calibration method for improving the performance of low-cost particle sensors. Building and Environment. 2021. Vol. 190. P. 107457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107457
  3. Hojaiji H., Kalantarian H., Bui A.A., King C.E., Sarrafzadeh M. Temperature and humidity calibration of a low-cost wireless dust sensor for real-time monitoring. In 2017 IEEE sensors applications symposium (SAS). 2017, March. P. 1-6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS.2017.7894056
  4. Lee C.H., Wang Y.B., Yu H.L. An efficient spatiotemporal data calibration approach for the low-cost PM2. 5 sensing network: A case study in Taiwan. Environment international. 2019. Vol. 130. P. 104838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.032
  5. Hofman J., Nikolaou M., Shantharam S.P., Stroobants C., Weijs S. & La Manna V.P. Distant calibration of low-cost PM and NO2 sensors; evidence from multiple sensor testbeds. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 2022. Vol. 13 (1). P. 101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101246
  6. Gonzalez A., Boies A., Swason J., Kittelson D. Field calibration of low-cost air pollution sensors. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions. 2019. P. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-299
  7. Cavaliere A., Carotenuto F., Di Gennaro F., Gioli B., Gualtier, G. & Martelli F. Development of low-cost air quality stations for next generation monitoring networks: Calibration and validation of PM2. 5 and PM10 sensors. Sensors. 2018. Vol. 18 (9). P 2843. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092843
  8. Wang Y., Du Y., Wang J., Li T. Calibration of a low-cost PM2. 5 monitor using a random forest model. Environment international. 2019. Vol. 133. P. 105161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105161
  9. Cordero J. M., Borge R., Narros A. Using statistical methods to carry out in field calibrations of low-cost air quality sensors. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2018. Vol. 267. P. 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.04.021
  10. Raheja G., Sabi K., Sonla H., Gbedjangni E.K., McFarlane C.M., Hodoli C.G. et al. A network of field-calibrated low-cost sensor measurements of PM2. 5 in Lomé, Togo, over one to two years. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry. 2022. Vol. 6 (4). P. 1011-1021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00391
  11. Manikonda A., Zíková N., Hopke P.K., Ferro A.R. Laboratory assessment of low- cost PM monitors. Journal of Aerosol Science. 2016. Vol. 102. P. 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.08.010
  1. Steinle S., Reis S., Sabel C.E., Semple S., Twigg M.M., Braban C.F. et al. Personal exposure monitoring of PM2.5 in indoor and outdoor microenvironments. Science of the Total Environment. 2015. Vol. 508. P. 383-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.003
  2. Han I., Symanski E., Stock T.H. Feasibility of using low-cost portable particle monitors for measurement of fine and coarse particulate matter in urban ambient air. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 2017. Vol. 67 (3). P. 330-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1241195
  3. Williams R., Kaufman A., Hanley T., Rice J., Garvey S. Evaluation of field-deployed low- cost PM sensors. PA/600/R-14/464 (NTIS PB 2015-102104). 2014.
  4. Wang Y., Li J., Jing H., Zhang Q., Jiang J. & Biswas P. Laboratory evaluation and calibration of three low-cost particle sensors for particulate matter measurement. Aerosol science and technology. 2015. Vol. 49 (11). P. 1063-1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1100710
  5. Alvarado M., Gonzalez F., Fletcher A., Doshi A. Towards the development of a low-cost airborne sensing system to monitor dust particles after blasting at open-pit mine sites. Sensors. 2015. Vol. 15 (8). P. 19667-19687. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150819667
  6. Sousan S., Koehler K., Hallett L., Peters T.M. Evaluation of the Alphasense optical particle counter (OPC-N2) and the Grimm portable aerosol spectrometer (PAS- 1.108). Aerosol Science and Technology. 2016. Vol. 50 (12). P. 1352-1365. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1232859
  7. Zikova N., Hopke P.K., Ferro A.R. Evaluation of new low-cost particle monitors for PM2. 5 concentrations measurements. Journal of Aerosol Science. 2017. Vol. 105. P. 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.11.010
  8. Olivares G., Longley I., Coulson G. Development of a low-cost device for observing indoor particle levels associated with source activities in the home. International Society of Exposure Science (ISES). Seattle, WA. 2012.
  9. Kelly K.E., Whitaker J., Petty A., Widmer C., Dybwad A., Sleeth D. et al. Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor. Environmental pollution. 2017. Vol. 221. P. 491-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.039
  10. Austin E., Novosselov I., Seto E., Yost M.G. Laboratory evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS low-cost particulate matter sensor. PloSone. 2015. Vol. 10 (9). P. e0137789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137789
  11. Gao M., Cao J., Seto E. A distributed network of low-cost continuous reading sensors to measure spatiotemporal variations of PM2. 5 in Xi’an, China. Environmental pollution. 2015. Vol. 199. P. 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.013
  12. Johnson K.K., Bergin M.H., Russell A.G., Hagler G.S. Using low cost sensors to measure ambient particulate matter concentrations and on-road emissions factors. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions. 2016. P. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2015-331
  13. Freitas M.C., Pacheco A.M.G., Verburg T.G., Wolterbeek H. T. Effect of particulate matter, atmospheric gases, temperature, and humidity on respiratory and circulatory diseases’ trends in Lisbon, Portugal. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2010. Vol. 162 (1). P. 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0780-5
  14. Zhang L., Cheng Y., Zhang Y., He Y., Gu Z. & Yu C. Impact of air humidity fluctuation on the rise of PM mass concentration based on the high-resolution monitoring data. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2017. Vol. 17 (2). P. 543-552. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.07.0296
  15. Csavina J., Field J., Félix O., Corral-Avitia A.Y., Sáez A.E. & Betterton E.A. Effect of wind speed and relative humidity on atmospheric dust concentrations in semi-arid climates. Science of the Total Environment, 487, 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.138
  16. Wang, J., Ogawa, S. (2015). Effects of meteorological conditions on PM2.5 concentrations in Nagasaki, Japan. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2014. Vol. 12 (8). P. 9089-9101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120809089
  17. Tai A.P., Mickley L.J., Jacob D.J. Correlations between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and meteorological variables in the United States: Implications for the sensitivity of PM2. 5 to climate change. Atmospheric environment. 2010. Vol. 44 (32). P. 3976- 3984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.06.060
  18. Huang C.H., Tai C.Y. Relative humidity effect on PM2.5 readings recorded by collocated beta attenuation monitors. Environmental Engineering Science. 2008. Vol. 25 (7). P. 1079-1090. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2007.0142
  19. Wang J., Wang Y., Liu H., Yang Y., Zhang X., Li Y. et al. Diagnostic identification of the impact of meteorological conditions on PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing. Atmospheric Environment. 2013. Vol. 81. P. 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.033
  20. Zhang X., Xu X., Ding Y., Liu Y., Zhang H., Wang Y. et al. Th impact of meteorological changes from 2013 to 2017 on PM2.5 mass reduction in key regions in China. Science China Earth Sciences. 2019. Vol. 62 (12). P. 1885-1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9343-3
  21. Chen Z., Chen D., Zhao C., Kwan M.P., Cai J., Zhuang Y. et al. Influence of meteorological conditions on PM2.5 concentrations across China: A review of methodology and mechanism. Environment international. 2020. Vol. 139. P. 105558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105558
  22. He J., Gong S., Yu Y., Yu L., Wu L., Mao H. et al. Air pollution characteristics and their relation to meteorological conditions during 2014-2015 in major Chinese cities. Environmental pollution. 2017. Vol. 223. P. 484-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.050
  23. Kamińska J.A. Th use of random forests in modelling short-term air pollution effects based on traffic and meteorological conditions: a case study in Wrocław. Journal of environmental management. 2018. Vol. 217. P. 164-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.094
  24. Dayan U., Levy I. The influence of meteorological conditions and atmospheric circulation types on PM 10 and visibility in Tel Aviv. Journal of Applied Meteorology. 2005. Vol. 44 (5). P. 606-619. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2232.1
  25. Raisi L., Aleksandropoulou V., Lazaridis M., Katsivela E. Size distribution of viable, cultivable, airborne microbes and their relationship to particulate matter concentrations and meteorological conditions in a Mediterranean site. Aerobiologia. 2013. Vol. 29 (2), P. 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-012-9276-9
  26. Zhang Q., Quan J., Tie X., Li X., Liu Q., Gao Y. et al. Effects of meteorology and secondary particle formation on visibility during heavy haze events in Beijing, China. Science of the Total Environment. 2015. Vol. 502. P. 578-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.079
  27. Jo E.J., Lee W.S., Jo H.Y., Kim C.H., Eom J.S., Mok J.H. et al. Effects of particulate matter on respiratory disease and the impact of meteorological factors in Busan, Korea. Respiratory Medicine. 2017. Vol. 124. P. 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2017.02.010
  28. Dung N.A., Son D.H., Tri D.Q. Effect of Meteorological Factors on PM 10 Concentration in Hanoi, Vietnam. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection. 2019. Vol. 7 (11). P. 138. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2019.711010
  29. Galindo N., Varea M., Gil-Moltó J., Yubero E., Nicolás J. The influence of meteorology on particulate matter concentrations at an urban Mediterranean location. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2011. Vol. 215 (1). P. 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0484-z
  30. Pan C., Kang Z.M. Impact of Meteorological Conditions on PM 2.5 in Jiangsu Province from 2001 to 2019. Huan jing ke xue. 2022. Vol. 43 (2). P. 649-662. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202104292
  31. Jacob D.J., Winner D.A. Effect of climate change on air quality. Atmospheric environment.2009.Vol. 43(1).P. 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.051
  32. Zhang H., Wang Y., Hu J., Ying Q., Hu X.M. Relationships between meteorological parameters and criteria air pollutants in three megacities in China. Environmental research. 2015. Vol. 140. P. 242-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.04.004
  33. Wang X., Zhang R. Effects of atmospheric circulations on the interannual variation in PM 2.5 concentrations over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in 2013- 2018. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2020. Vol. 20 (13). P. 7667-7682. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7667-2020
  34. Fine G.F., Cavanagh L.M., Afonja A., Binions R. Metal oxide semi-conductor gas sensors in environmental monitoring. Sensors. 2010. Vol. 10 (6). P. 5469-5502. https://doi.org/10.3390/s100605469
  35. Binions R., Naik A.J.T. Metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors in environmental monitoring. In Semiconductor gas sensors. 2013. P. 433-466. Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098665.4.433
  36. Masson N., Piedrahita R., Hannigan M. Approach for quantification of metal oxide type semiconductor gas sensors used for ambient air quality monitoring. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2015. Vol. 208. P. 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.11.032
  37. Jaaniso R., Tan O.K. (Eds.). Semiconductor gas sensors. Elsevier, 2013. 576 р. Woodhead Publishing https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098665
  38. Peterson P.J., Aujla A., Grant K.H., Brundle A.G., Thmpson M.R., Vande Hey J. et al. Practical use of metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors for measuring nitrogen dioxide and ozone in urban environments. Sensors. 2017. Vol. 17 (7). P. 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17071653
  39. Burgués J., Marco S. Low power operation of temperature-modulated metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors. Sensors. 2018. Vol. 18 (2). P. 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020339
  40. Isaac N.A., Pikaar I., Biskos G. Metal oxide semiconducting nanomaterials for air quality gas sensors: operating principles, performance, and synthesis techniques. Microchimica Acta. 2022. Vol. 189 (5). P. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-022-05254-0
  41. Potyrailo R.A., Go S., Sexton D., Li X., Alkadi N., Kolmakov A. et al. Extraordinary performance of semiconducting metal oxide gas sensors using dielectric excitation. Nature Electronics. 2020. Vol. 3 (5). P. 280-289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928- 020-0402-3
  42. Liu H., Zhang L., Li K. H. H., Tan O. K. Microhotplates for metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor applications. Towards the CMOS-MEMS monolithic approach. Micromachines. 2018. Vol. 9 (11). P. 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9110557
  43. Baur T., Amann J., Schultealbert C., Schütze A. Field Study of Metal Oxide Semiconductor Gas Sensors in Temperature Cycled Operation for Selective VOC Monitoring in Indoor Air. Atmosphere. 2021. Vol. 12 (5). P. 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12050647
  44. Moseley P. T. Progress in the development of semiconducting metal oxide gas sensors: a review. Measurement Science and Technology. 2017. Vol. 28 (8). P. 082001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aa7443
  45. Palacín J., Martínez D., Clotet E., Pallejà T., Burgués J., Fonollosa J. et al. Application of an array of metal-oxide semiconductor gas sensors in an assistant personal robot for early gas leak detection. Sensors. 2019. Vol. 19 (9). P. 1957. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19091957
  46. Baur T., Schultealbert C., Schütze A., Sauerwald T. Novel method for the detection of short trace gas pulses with metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors. Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems. 2018. Vol. 7 (1). P. 411-419. https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-411-2018
  47. Zhang C., Lu Y., Xu, J., Debliquy M. Room temperature conductive type metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors for NO2 detection. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 2019. Vol. 289. P. 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.02.027
  48. Galatsis K., Wlodarski W., Kalantar-Zadeh K., Trinchi A. Investigation of gas sensors for cabin air quality monitoring. In 2002 Conference on Optoelectronic and Microelectronic Materials and Devices. COMMAD 2002. Proceedings (Cat. No. 02EX601). 2002, December. P. 229-232. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMMAD.2002.1237234
  49. Mahajan S., Jagtap S. Metal-oxide semiconductors for carbon monoxide (CO) gas sensing: A review. Applied materials today. 2020. Vol. 18. P. 100483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100483
  50. Neri G. First fifty years of chemoresistive gas sensors. Chemosensors. 2015. Vol. 3 (1). P. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors3010001
  51. Wetchakun K., Samerjai T., Tamaekong N., Liewhiran C., Siriwong C., Kruefu V. et al. Semiconducting metal oxides as sensors for environmentally hazardous gases. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2011. Vol. 160 (1). P. 580-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2011.08.032
  52. Mirzaei A., Leonardi S. G., Neri G. Detection of hazardous volatile organic com- pounds (VOCs) by metal oxide nanostructures-based gas sensors: A review. Ceramics international. 2016. Vol. 42 (14). P. 15119-15141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.145
  53. Lin T., Lv X., Hu Z., Xu A., Feng C. Semiconductor metal oxides as chemoresistive sensors for detecting volatile organic compounds. Sensors. 2019. Vol. 19 (2). P. 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020233
  54. Mirzaei A., Kim H. W., Kim S. S., Neri G. Nanostructured semiconducting metal oxide gas sensors for acetaldehyde detection. Chemosensors. 2019. Vol. 7 (4). P. 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors7040056
  55. Inoue T., Ohtsuka K., Yoshida Y., Matsuura Y., Kajiyama Y. Metal oxide semiconductor NO2 sensor. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 1995. Vol. 25 (1-3). P. 388-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4005(95)85087-2
  56. Meixner H., Gerblinger J., Lampe U., Fleischer M. Thin-film gas sensors based on semiconducting metal oxides. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 1995. Vol. 23 (2-3). P. 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4005(94)01266-K
  57. Chai H., Zheng Z., Liu K., Xu J., Wu K., Luo Y. et al. Stability of Metal Oxide Semiconductor Gas Sensors: A Review. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2022. Vol. 22 (6). P. 5470-5481. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3148264
  58. Bastuck M., Baur T., Richter M., Mull B., Schütze A. & Sauerwald T. Comparison of ppb-level gas measurements with a metal-oxide semiconductor gas sensor in two independent laboratories. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2018. Vol. 273. P. 1037-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.06.097
  59. Nikolic M.V., Milovanovic V., Vasiljevic Z.Z., Stamenkovic Z. Semiconductor gas sensors: Materials, technology, design, and application. Sensors. 2020. Vol. 20 (22). P. 6694. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226694
  60. Sadik O.A., Van Emon J.M. Applications of electrochemical immunosensors to environmental monitoring. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 1996. Vol. 11 (8). i-x. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5663(96)85936-7
  61. Pokric B., Krco S., Drajic D., Pokric M., Jokic I. & Stojanovic M.J. ekoNET-environmental monitoring using low-cost sensors for detecting gases, particulate matter, and meteorological parameters. In 2014 Eighth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing. 2014, July. P. 421-426. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMIS.2014.57
  62. Kumar A., Hancke G.P. Energy efficient environment monitoring system based on the IEEE 802.15. 4 standard for low cost requirements. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2014. Vol. 14 (8). P. 2557-2566. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2014.2313348
  63. Mead M.I., Popoola O.A.M., Stewart G.B., Landshoff P., Calleja M., Hayes M. et al. The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, high-density networks. Atmospheric Environment. 2013. Vol. 70. P. 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.060
  64. Hanrahan G., Patil D.G., Wang J. Electrochemical sensors for environmental monitoring: design, development and applications. Journal of environmental monito- ring. 2004. Vol. 6 (8). P. 657-664. https://doi.org/10.1039/B403975K
  65. Tian B., Hou K.M., Diao X., Shi H., Zhou H. & Wang W. Environment-adaptive calibration system for outdoor low-cost electrochemical gas sensors. IEEE Access. 2019. Vol. 7. P. 62592-62605. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916826
  66. Stetter J.R., Li J. Amperometric gas sensors a review. Chemical reviews. 2008. Vol. 108 (2). P. 352-366. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0681039
  67. Xiong L., Compton R.G. Amperometric gas detection: A review. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2014. Vol. 9 (12). P. 7152-7181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1452-3981(23)10957-6
  68. Helm I., Jalukse L., Leito I. Measurement uncertainty estimation in amperometric sensors: A tutorial review. Sensors. 2010. Vol. 10 (5). P. 4430-4455. https://doi.org/10.3390/s100504430
  69. Cao Z., Buttner W.J., Stetter J.R. The properties and applications of amperometric gas sensors. Electroanalysis. 1992. Vol. 4 (3). P. 253-266. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.1140040302
  70. Baron R., Saffell J. Amperometric gas sensors as a low-cost emerging technology platform for air quality monitoring applications: A review. ACS sensors. 2017. Vol. 2 (11). P. 1553-1566. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00620
  71. Knake R., Jacquinot P., Hodgson A.W., Hauser P.C. Amperometric sensing in the gas-phase. Analytica chimica acta. 2005. Vol. 549 (1-2). P. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.06.007
  72. Alber K.S., Cox J.A., Kulesza P.J. Solid‐state amperometric sensors for gas phase analytes: A review of recent advances. Electroanalysis. 1997. Vol. 9 (2). P. 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.1140090202
  73. Opekar F., Štulík K. Amperometric solid-state gas sensors: materials for their active components. Critical reviews in analytical chemistry. 2002. Vol. 32 (3). P. 253-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408340290765551
  74. Carter M.T., Stetter J.R., Findlay M.W., Meulendyk B.J., Patel V. & Peaslee D. Amperometric gas sensors: from classical industrial health and safety to environmental awareness and public health. ECS Transactions. 2016. Vol. 75 (16). P. 91. https://doi.org/10.1149/07516.0091ecst
  75. Chung P.R., Tzeng C.T., Ke M.T., Lee C.Y. Formaldehyde gas sensors: a review. Sensors. 2013. Vol. 13 (4). P. 4468-4484. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130404468
  76. Awang Z. Gas sensors: A review. Sens. Transducers. 2014. Vol. 168 (4). P. 61-75.
  77. Zohora S.E., Khan A.M., Hundewale N. Chemical sensors employed in electronic noses: A review. Advances in computing and information technology. 2013. P. 177- 184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31600-5_18
  78. Karthikeyan S., Pandya H.M., Sharma M.U., Gopal K. Gas sensors-a review. J. Environ. Nanotechnol. 2015. Vol. 4 (4). P. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.13074/jent.2015.12.153163
  79. Ota K.I., Kreysa G., Savinell R.F. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of applied electrochemistry. New York: Springer, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6996-5
  80. Kalvoda R. Electrochemical analysis for environmental control. Electroanalysis. 1990. Vol. 2 (5). P. 341-346. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.1140020503
  81. Li T., Wu Y., Huang J., Zhang S. Gas sensors based on membrane diffusion for environmental monitoring. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2017. Vol. 243. P. 566-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.12.026
  82. Afshar-Mohajer N., Zuidema C., Sousan S., Hallett L., Tatum M., Rule A.M. et al. Evaluation of low-cost electro-chemical sensors for environmental monitoring of ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene. 2018. Vol. 15 (2). P. 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.1388918
  83. Wang J. Portable electrochemical systems. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2002. Vol. 21 (4). P. 226-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(02)00402-8
  84. Sun L., Westerdahl D., Ning Z. Development and evaluation of a novel and cost-effective approach for low-cost NO2 sensor drift correction. Sensors. 2017. Vol. 17 (8). P. 1916. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081916
  85. Sun L., Wong K. C., Wei P., Ye S., Huang H., Yang F. et al. Development and application of a next generation air sensor network for the Hong Kong marathon 2015 air quality monitoring. Sensors. 2016. Vol. 16 (2). P. 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16020211
  86. Popoola O.A., Stewart G.B., Mead M.I., Jones R.L. Development of a baseline-temperature correction methodology for electrochemical sensors and its implications for long-term stability. Atmospheric environment. 2016. Vol. 147. P. 330-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.024
  87. Yin X., Zhang L., Tian F., Zhang D. Temperature modulated gas sensing E-nose system for low-cost and fast detection. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2015. Vol. 16 (2). P. 464-474. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2483901
  88. Manzoli A., Steffens C., Paschoalin R.T., Correa A.A., Alves W.F., Leite F.L. et al. Low-cost gas sensors produced by the graphite line-patterning technique applied to monitoring banana ripeness. Sensors. 2011. Vol. 11 (6). P. 6425-6434. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110606425
  89. Hu S.C., Wang Y.C., Huang C.Y., Tseng Y.C. Measuring air quality in city areas by vehicular wireless sensor networks. Journal of Systems and Soft re. 2011. Vol. 84 (11). P. 2005-2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.043
  90. Al Barakeh Z., Breuil P., Redon N., Pijolat C., Locoge N. & Viricelle J.P. Development of a normalized multi-sensors system for low cost on-line atmospheric pollution detection. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2017. Vol. 241. P. 1235-1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.006
  91. Johannessen L.N., Grimstad H.J., Skjetne J.E., Myklebust I.N., Svendsen K.V.H. Embedded systems and the Internet of Things: Can low-cost gas sensors be used in risk assessment of occupational exposure? Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2020. Vol. 17 (10). P. 495-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2020.1798453
  92. Heimann I., Bright V.B., McLeod M.W., Mead M.I., Popoola O.A.M., Stewart G.B. et al. Source attribution of air pollution by spatial scale separation using high spatial density networks of low-cost air quality sensors. Atmospheric Environment. 2015. Vol. 113. P. 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.057
  93. Honeycutt W.T., Ley M.T., Materer N.F. Precision and limits of detection for selected commercially available, low-cost carbon dioxide and methane gas sensors. Sensors. 2019. Vol. 19 (14). P. 3157. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143157
  94. Tanaka Y., Nakamoto T., Moriizumi T. Study of highly sensitive smell sensing system using gas detector tube combined with optical sensor. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2006. Vol. 119 (1). P. 84-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2005.11.068
  95. Bruno C., Licciardello A., Nastasi G.A.M., Passaniti F., Brigante C., Sudano F. et al. Embedded artificial intelligence approach for gas recognition in smart agriculture applications using low cost mox gas sensors. In 2021 Smart Systems Integration (SSI). 2021, April. P. 1-5. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSI52265.2021.9467029
  96. Love C., Nazemi H., El-Masri E., Ambrose K., Freund M.S. & Emadi A. A review on advanced sensing materials for agricultural gas sensors. Sensors. 2021. Vol. 21 (10). P. 3423. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103423
  97. Kumar R., Jaiswal M., Kushwaha N., Bansal S., Mazumder N. & Mittal J. Nanomaterial-Based Gas Sensors for Agriculture Sector. Biosensors in Agriculture: Recent Trends and Future Perspectives. 2021. P. 51-80. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66165-6_4
  98. Nasiri N., Clarke C. Nanostructured chemiresistive gas sensors for medical applications. Sensors. 2019. Vol. 19 (3). P. 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19030462
  99. Righettoni M., Amann A., Pratsinis S. E. Breath analysis by nanostructured metal oxides as chemo-resistive gas sensors. Materials Today. 2015. Vol. 18 (3). P. 163- 171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.08.017
  100. Falohun A.S., Oke A.O., Abolaji B.M., Oladejo O.E. Dangerous gas detection using an integrated circuit and MQ-9. International Journal of Computer Applications. 2016. Vol. 135 (7). P. 30-34. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016908473
  101. Kodali R.K., Yerroju S. IoT based smart emergency response system for fire hazards. In 2017 3rd International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Computing and Communication Technology (iCATccT). 2017, December. P. 194-199. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICATCCT.2017.8389132
  102. Jain P.C., Kushwaha R. Wireless gas sensor network for detection and monitoring of harmful gases in utility areas and industries. In 2012 Sixth International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST). 2012, December. P. 642-646. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSensT.2012.6461759
  103. Cho Y., Smits K.M., Riddick S.N., Zimmerle D.J. Calibration and field deployment of low-cost sensor network to monitor underground pipeline leakage. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2022. Vol. 355. P. 131276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.131276
  104. Williams R., Kilaru V., Snyder E., Kaufman A., Dye T., Rutter A. et al. Air sensor guidebook. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2014. 66 р.
  105. Borrego C., Costa A.M., Ginja J., Amorim M., Coutinho M., Karatzas K. et al. Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir joint exercise. Atmospheric Environment. 2016. Vol. 147. P. 246-263. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.050
  106. Spinelle L., Gerboles M., Aleixandre M. Performance evaluation of amperometric sensors for the monitoring of O3 and NO2 in ambient air at ppb level. Procedia engineering. 2015. Vol. 120. P. 480-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.676
  107. Lin C., Gillespie J., Schuder M.D., Duberstein W., Beverland I.J. & Heal M.R. Evaluation and calibration of Aeroqual series 500 portable gas sensors for accurate measurement of ambient ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Atmospheric Environment. 2015. Vol. 100. P. 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.002
  108. Wahlborg D., Björling M., Mattsson M. Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 2021. Vol. 193 (5). P. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09033-x
  109. Castell N., Dauge F.R., Dongol R., Vogt M., Schneider P. Uncertainty in air quality observations using low-cost sensors. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 2016, April. P. 2016-5692. EPSC.
  110. Margaritis D., Keramydas C., Papachristos I., Lambropoulou D. Calibration of Low- cost Gas Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2021. Vol. 21. P. 210073. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210073
  111. Williams R., Long R., Beaver M., Kaufman A., Zeiger F., Heimbinder M. et al. Sensor Evaluation Report. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 2014. EPA/600/R-14/143 (NTIS PB2015-100611).
  112. Lewis A., Edwards P. Validate personal air-pollution sensors. Nature. 2016. Vol. 535 (7610). P. 29-31. https://doi.org/10.1038/535029a
  113. Plaisance H., Piechocki-Minguy A., Garcia-Fouque S., Galloo J. C. Influence of meteorological factors on the NO2 measurements by passive diffusion tube. Atmospheric Environment. 2004. Vol. 38 (4). P. 573-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.09.073
  114. Müller I., Erbertseder T., Taubenböck H. Tropospheric NO2: Explorative analyses of spatial variability and impact factors. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2022. Vol. 270. P. 112839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112839
  115. Samad A., Obando Nuñez D.R., Solis Castillo G.C., Laquai B., Vogt U. Effect of relative humidity and air temperature on the results obtained from low-cost gas sensors for ambient air quality measurements. Sensors. 2020. Vol. 20 (18). P. 5175. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185175
  116. Breitegger P., Schweighofer B., Wegleiter H., Knoll M., Lang B. & Bergmann A. Towards low-cost QEPAS sensors for nitrogen dioxide detection. Photoacoustics. 2020. Vol. 18. P. 100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100169
  117. Han P., Mei H., Liu D., Zeng N., Tang X., Wang Y. et al. Calibrations of Low-Cost Air Pollution Monitoring Sensors for CO, NO2, O3, and SO2. Sensors. 2021. Vol. 21 (1). P. 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010256
  118. Vajs I., Drajic D., Gligoric N., Radovanovic I., Popovic I. Developing Relative Humidity and Temperature Corrections for Low-Cost Sensors Using Machine Learning. Sensors. 2021. Vol. 21 (10). P. 3338. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103338
  119. Miech J.A., Stanton L., Gao M., Micalizzi P., Uebelherr J., Herckes P. et al. Calibration of Low-Cost NO2 Sensors through Environmental Factor Correction. Toxics. 2021. Vol. 9 (11). P. 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9110281
  120. Spinelle L., Aleixandre M., Gerboles M. Protocol of evaluation and calibration of low-cost gas sensors for the monitoring of air pollution. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. 2013. 44 р.
  1. Hossain M., Saffell J., Baron R. Differentiating NO2 and O3 at low cost air quality amperometric gas sensors. ACS Sensors. 2016. Vol. 1 (11). P. 1291-1294. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.6b00603
  2. Dieguez A., Romano-Rodrıguez A., Alay J. L., Morante J. R., Barsan N., Kappler J. et al. Parameter optimisation in SnO2 gas sensors for NO2 detection with low cross-sensitivity to CO: sol-gel preparation, fi preparation, powder calcination, doping and grinding. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2000. Vol. 65 (1-3). P. 166-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(99)00339-1
  3. Cantalini C., Pelino M., Sun H.T., Faccio M., Santucci S., Lozzi L. et al. Cross sensitivity and stability of NO2 sensors from WO3 thin film. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 1996. Vol. 35 (1-3). P. 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(97)80039-1
  4. Khan M.A.H., Thomson B., Debnath R., Motayed A., Rao M.V. Nanowire-based sensor array for detection of cross-sensitive gases using PCA and machine learning algorithms. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2020. Vol. 20 (11). P. 6020-6028. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2972542
  5. Johansson J.K., Mellqvist J., Samuelsson J., Offerle B., Lefer B., Rappenglück B. et al. Emission measurements of alkenes, alkanes, SO2, and NO2 from stationary sources in Southeast Texas over a 5 year period using SOF and mobile DOAS. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2014. Vol. 119 (4). P. 1973-1991. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020485
  6. Oletic D., Jelicic V., Antolovic D., Bilas V. Energy-efficient atmospheric CO concentration sensing with on-demand operating MOX gas sensor. Sensors. 2014, November. P. 795-798. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2014.6985119
  7. Oletic D., Bilas V. Empowering smartphone users with sensor node for air quality measurement. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2013. Vol. 450. № 1. P. 012028. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/450/1/012028
  8. Wen T.H., Jiang J.A., Sun C.H., Juang J.Y., Lin T.S. Monitoring street-level spatial-temporal variations of carbon monoxide in urban settings using a wireless sensor network (WSN) framework. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2013. Vol. 10 (12). P. 6380-6396. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10126380
  9. Yaswanth D., Umar S. A Study on Pollution Monitoring system in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Computer Technology. 2013. Vol. 3 (9). P. 324.
  10. Jelicic V., Oletic D., Sever T., Bilas V. Evaluation of mox gas sensor transient response for low-power operation. In 2015 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS). 2015, April. P. 1-5. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS.2015.7133584
  11. Yaswanth D., Satwik B.B. A Study on Pollution Monitoring system in Wireless Sensor Networks. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology. 2014. Р. 14.8-Е: 15.
  12. Rossi M., Brunelli D. Gas sensing on unmanned vehicles: Challenges and opportunities. In 2017 New Generation of CAS (NGCAS). 2017. P. 117-120. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/NGCAS.2017.58
  13. Saha H.N., Auddy S., Chatterjee A., Pal S., Pandey S., Singh R. et al. Pollution control using internet of things (IoT). In 2017 8th Annual Industrial Automation and Electromechanical Engineering Conference (IEMECON). 2017. P. 65-68. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMECON.2017.8079563
  14. Theunis J., Stevens M., Botteldooren D. Sensing the environment. In Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness. 2017. P. 21-46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25658-0_2
  15. Taştan M., Gökozan H. Real-time monitoring of indoor air quality with internet of things-based E-nose. Applied Sciences. 2019. Vol. 9 (16). P. 3435. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163435
  16. Bathiya B., Srivastava S., Mishra B. Air pollution monitoring using wireless sensor network. In 2016 IEEE international WIE conference on electrical and computer engineering (WIECON-ECE). 2016, December. P. 112-117. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WIECON-ECE.2016.8009098
  17. Suárez J.I., Arroyo P., Lozano J., Herrero J.L., Padilla M. Bluetooth gas sensing module combined with smartphones for air quality monitoring. Chemosphere. 2018. Vol. 205. P. 618-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.154
  18. Lozano J., Suárez J.I., Meléndez F., Rodríguez S., Arroyo P., Herrero J.L. et al. Personal electronic systems for citizen measurements of air quality. In 2019 5th Experiment International Conference. 2019, June. P. 315-319. https://doi.org/10.1109/EXPAT.2019.8876471
  19. Shelestov A., Sumilo L., Lavreniuk M., Vasiliev V., Bulanaya T., Gomilko I. et al. Indoor and outdoor air quality monitoring on the base of intelligent sensors for smart city. In XVIII International Conference on Data Science and Intelligent Analysis of Information. 2018, July. P. 134-145. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97885-7_14
  20. Cross E.S., Williams L.R., Lewis D.K., Magoon G.R., Onasch T.B., Kaminsky M.L. et al. Use of electrochemical sensors for measurement of air pollution: correcting interference response and validating measurements. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2017. Vol. 10 (9). P. 3575-3588. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3575-2017
  21. Liu X., Jayaratne R., Thai P., Kuhn T., Zing I., Christensen B. et al. Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring. Environmental research. 2020. Vol. 185. P. 109438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109438
  22. Bertrand L., Dawkins L., Jayaratne R., Morawska L. How to choose healthier urban biking routes: CO as a proxy of traffic pollution. Heliyon, 2020. Vol. 6 (6). P. e04195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04195
  23. Casey J.G., Ortega J., Coffey E., Hannigan M. Low-cost measurement techniques to characterize the influence of home heating fuel on carbon monoxide in Navajo homes. Science of the Total Environment, 2018. Vol. 625. P. 608-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.312
  24. Zuidema C., Sousan S., Stebounova L.V., Gray A., Liu X. et al. Mapping occupational hazards with a multi-sensor network in a heavy-vehicle manufacturing facility. Annals of work exposures and health, 2019. Vol. 63 (3). P. 280-293. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxy111
  25. Pang X., Shaw M.D., Gillot S., Lewis A.C. The impacts of water vapour and co-pollutants on the performance of electrochemical gas sensors used for air quality monitoring. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2018. Vol. 266. P. 674-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.03.144
  26. Pang X., Chen L., Shi K., Wu F., Chen J., Fang S. et al. A lightweight low-cost and multipollutant sensor package for aerial observations of air pollutants in atmospheric boundary layer. Science of The Total Environment. 2021. Vol. 764. P. 142828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142828
  27. Wei P., Ning Z., Ye S., Sun L., Yang F., Wong K.C. et al. Impact analysis of temperature and humidity conditions on electrochemical sensor response in ambient air quality monitoring. Sensors. 2018. Vol. 18 (2). P. 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020059
  28. Tryner J., Phillips M., Quinn C., Neymark G., Wilson A., Jathar S.H. et al. Design and testing of a low-cost sensor and sampling platform for indoor air quality. Building and Environment. 2021. Vol. 206. P. 108398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108398
  29. Borghi F., Spinazzè A., Rovelli S., Campagnolo D., Del Buono L., Cattaneo A. et al. Miniaturized monitors for assessment of exposure to air pollutants: A review. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2017. Vol. 14 (8). P. 909. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080909
  30. Marinov M.B., Topalov I., Gieva E., Nikolov G. Air quality monitoring in urban environments. In 2016 39th International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology (ISSE). 2016, May. P. 443-448. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSE.2016.7563237
  31. Roberts T.J., Braban C.F., Oppenheimer C., Martin R.S., Freshwater R.A., Dawson D.H. et al. Electrochemical sensing of volcanic gases. Chemical Geology. 2012. Vol. 332. P. 74-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.08.027
  32. Ionascu M.E., Castell N., Boncalo O., Schneider P., Darie M. & Marcu M. Calibration of CO, NO2, and O3 Using Airify: A Low-Cost Sensor Cluster for Air Quality Monitoring. Sensors. 2021. Vol. 21 (23). P. 7977. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21237977
  33. Alhasa K.M., Mohd Nadzir M.S., Olalekan P., Latif M.T., Yusup Y., Iqbal Faruque M.R. et al. Calibration model of a low-cost air quality sensor using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Sensors. 2018. Vol. 18 (12). P. 4380. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124380
  34. Buck A., Roberts M.I., Overfelt R. Transient response characteristics of electrochemical carbon monoxide sensors. In 43rd International Conference on Environmental Systems. 2013. P. 3343. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-3343
  35. Yared R. Sensor-Based Smart Oven System to Enhance Cooking Safety. In Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings. 2016. Vol. 1. № 2. P. 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-3-S2003
  36. Pannek C., Weber C., Vetter T., Pohle R., Engel L., Eberhardt A. et al. Colorimetric Sensor System for the Detection of Low Co-Concentrations in Real Fire Tests. In 2019 20th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems & Eurosensors XXXIII (TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS XXXIII). 2019, June. P. 1345-1348. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2019.8808645
  37. Xu Q., Goh H.C., Mousavi E., Nabizadeh Rafsanjani H., Varghese Z., Pandit Y. et al. Towards Personalization of Indoor Air Quality: Review of Sensing Requirements and Field Deployments. Sensors. 2022. Vol. 22 (9). P. 3444. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093444
  38. Williams D.E., Henshaw G.S., Bart M., Laing G., Wagner J., Naisbitt S. et al. Validation of low-cost ozone measurement instruments suitable for use in an air-quality monitoring network. Measurement Science and Technology. 2013. Vol. 24 (6). P. 065803. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/24/6/065803
  39. Bart M., Williams D.E., Ainslie B., McKendry I., Salmond J., Grange S.K. et al. High density ozone monitoring using gas sensitive semi-conductor sensors in the Lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia. Environmental science & technology. 2014. Vol. 48 (7). P. 3970-3977. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404610t
  40. Moltchanov S., Levy I., Etzion Y., Lerner U., Broday D.M. & Fishbain B. On the feasibility of measuring urban air pollution by wireless distributed sensor networks. Science of The Total Environment. 2015. Vol. 502. P. 537-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.059
  41. Spinelle L., Gerboles M., Aleixandre M., Bonavitacola F. Evaluation of metal oxides sensors for the monitoring of O 3 in ambient air at ppb level. Chemical Engineering Transactions. 2016. Vol. 54. P. 319-324. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1654054
  42. Miskell G., Alberti K., Feenstra B., Henshaw G.S., Papapostolou V., Patel H. et al. Reliable data from low cost ozone sensors in a hierarchical network. Atmospheric Environment. 2019. Vol. 214. P. 116870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116870
  43. Sadighi K., Coffey E., Polidori A., Feenstra B., Lv Q., Henze D.K. et al. Intra-urban spatial variability of surface ozone in Riverside, CA: viability and validation of low- cost sensors. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2018. Vol. 11 (3). P. 1777- 1792. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1777-2018
  44. Liu M., Barkjohn K.K., Norris C., Schauer J.J., Zhang J., Zhang Y. et al. Using low-cost sensors to monitor indoor, outdoor, and personal ozone concentrations in Beijing, China. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2020. Vol. 22 (1). P. 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EM00377K
  45. Mueller M., Meyer J., Hueglin C. Design of an ozone and nitrogen dioxide sensor unit and its long-term operation within a sensor network in the city of Zurich. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2017. Vol. 10 (10). P. 3783-3799. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3783-2017
  46. Williams D.E., Henshaw G.S., Bart M., Laing G., Wagner J., Naisbitt S. et al. Validation of low-cost ozone measurement instruments suitable for use in an air-quality monitoring network. Measurement Science and Technology. 2013. Vol. 24 (6). P. 065803. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/24/6/065803
  47. Pang X., Shaw M.D., Lewis A.C., Carpenter L.J., Batchellier T. Electrochemical ozone sensors: A miniaturised alternative for ozone measurements in laboratory experiments and air-quality monitoring. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2017. Vol. 240. P. 829-837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.09.020
  48. Masiol M., Squizzato S., Chalupa D., Rich D.Q., Hopke P.K. Spatial-temporal variations of summertime ozone concentrations across a metropolitan area using a network of low-cost monitors to develop 24 hourly land-use regression models. Science of The Total Environment. 2019. Vol. 654. P. 1167-1178. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.111
  49. Badura M., Batog P., Drzeniecka-Osiadacz A., Modzel P. Low-and Medium-Cost Sensors for Tropospheric Ozone Monitoring-Results of an Evaluation Study in Wrocław, Poland. Atmosphere. 2022. Vol. 13 (4). P. 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13040542
  50. Williams D.E., Salmond J., Yung Y.F., Akaji J., Wright B., Wilson J. et al. Development of low-cost ozone and nitrogen dioxide measurement instruments suitable for use in an air quality monitoring network. Sensors. 2009, October. P. 1099-1104. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2009.5398568
  51. Collier-Oxandale A., Coffey E., Thorson J., Johnston J., Hannigan M. Comparing building and neighborhood-scale variability of CO2 and O3 to inform deployment considerations for low-cost sensor system use. Sensors. 2018. Vol. 18 (5). P. 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051349
  52. Rynhach N.O., Vlasyk Li., Vlasyk L.I., Kolodnitska T.L. Urbanizatsiia i vplyv na zdorovia zabrudnennia povitria v Ukraini: zahrozy ta mozhlyvosti. Bukovynskyi medychnyi visnyk. 2022. № 2 (26). S. 69-76. https://doi.org/10.24061/2413-737.XXV%D0%86.2.102.2022.13
  53. Stakhiv I.R. Vplyv zabrudnennia povitrianoho seredovyshcha na stan zdorovia naselennia za 2001-2010 rr. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Teoretychni ta prykladni aspekty heoinformatyky». 2013. № 10. S. 126-132.
  54. Tarasova V.V. Vplyv zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria na stan zdorovia naselennia. Ahrosvit. 2103. № 16. S. 24-28.
  55. Kornus O., Kornus A., Shyshuk V., Kononykhin V. Doslidzhennia vplyvu zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria na onkolohichnu zakhvoriuvanist naselennia Sumskoi oblasti. Chasopys sotsialno-ekonomichnoi heohrafii. 2012. № 13(2). S. 151-157.
  56. Bielaieva I.V., Kalinkina O.M., Borobova N.A. Vplyv zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria na tempy starinnia liudyny. Naukovi pratsi Donetskoho natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu. Seriia: Problemy ekolohii. 2009. № 1-2. S. 94-102.
  57. Lyko S.M., Kaskiv M.V. Vplyv zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria na stan zakhvoriuvanosti naselennia m. Rivne. Pytannia bioindykatsii ta ekolohii. 2013. № 18 (2). S. 276-288.
  58. Kotko D.M., Honcharuk N.L., Shevtsov S.M., Levon M.M. Zabrudnennia povitria yak faktor, shcho formuie zdorovia ta vplyvaie na pratsezdatnist sportsmeniv. Naukovyi chasovys NPU imeni M.P. Drahomanova. 2022. № 4 (149). S. 64-69. https://doi.org/10.31392/NPU-nc.series15.2022.4(149).15
  59. Yun X., Shen G., Shen H., Meng W., Chen Y., Xu H. et al. Residential solid fuel emissions contribute significantly to air pollution and associated health impacts in China. Science advances. 2020. Vol. 6 (44). P. eaba7621. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba7621
  60. Manisalidis I., Stavropoulou E., Stavropoulos A., Bezirtzoglou E. Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: a review. Frontiers in public health. 2020. P. 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014
  61. Kotcher J., Maibach E., Choi W. T. Fossil fuels are harming our brains: identifying key messages about the health effects of air pollution from fossil fuels. BMC public health. 2019. Vol. 19 (1). P. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7373-1
  62. Campbell-Lendrum D., Prüss-Ustün A. Climate change, air pollution and noncommunicable diseases. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2019. Vol. 97 (2). P. 160. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.224295
  63. Balmes J. R. Household air pollution from domestic combustion of solid fuels and health. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2019. Vol. 143 (6). P. 1979-1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2019.04.016
  64. Guttikunda S.K., Jawahar P. Evaluation of particulate pollution and health impacts from planned expansion of coal-fired thermal power plants in India using WRF-CAMx modeling system. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2018. Vol. 18 (12). P. 3187-3202. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.04.0134
  65. Ambient air pollution: a global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. World Health Organization (WHO). 2016. 121 p. https://apps.who.int/iris/han-dle/10665/250141
  66. Copat C., Cristaldi A., Fiore M., Grasso A., Zuccarello P., Santo Signorelli S. et al. The role of air pollution (PM and NO2) in COVID-19 spread and lethality: a systematic review. Environmental research. 2020. Vol. 191. P. 110129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110129
  67. Travaglio M., Yu Y., Popovic R., Selley L., Leal N. S., Martins L. M. Links between air pollution and COVID-19 in England. Environmental pollution. 2021. Vol. 268. P. 115859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115859
  68. Dutheil F., Baker J. S., Navel V. COVID-19 as a factor influencing air pollution? Environmental pollution. 2020. Vol. 263. P. 114466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114466
  69. Fattorini D., Regoli F. Role of the chronic air pollution levels in the Covid-19 outbreak risk in Italy. Environmental pollution. 2020. Vol. 264. P. 114732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114732
  70. Martelletti L., Martelletti P. Air pollution and the novel Covid-19 disease: a putative disease risk factor. SN comprehensive clinical medicine. 2020. Vol. 2 (4). P. 383-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00274-4
  71. Davidson C. I., Phalen R. F., Solomon P. A. Airborne particulate matter and human health: a review. Aerosol Science and Technology. 2005. Vol. 39 (8). P. 737-749. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500191348
  72. Chen L. C. Lippmann M. Effects of metals within ambient air particulate matter (PM) on human health. Inhalation toxicology. 2009. Vol. 21 (1). P. 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370802105405
  73. Harrison R. M., Yin J. Particulate matter in the atmosphere: which particle properties are important for its effects on health? Science of the Total Environment. 2000. Vol. 249 (1-3). P. 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00513-6
  74. Martinelli N., Olivieri O., Girelli D. Air particulate matter and cardiovascular disease: a narrative review. European journal of internal medicine. 2013. Vol. 24 (4). P. 295-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2013.04.001
  75. Ristovski Z. D., Miljevic B., Surawski N. C., Morawska L., Fong K. M., Goh F. et al. Respiratory health effects of diesel particulate matter. Respirology. 2012. Vol. 17 (2). P. 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02109.x
  76. Li Y., Henze D. K., Jack D., Kinney P. L. The influence of air quality model resolution on health impact assessment for fine particulate matter and its components. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health. 2016. Vol. 9 (1). P. 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-015-0321-z
  77. Zaporozhets A.A., Sverdlova A.D. Osobennosty prymenenyia tekhnolohyy Smart Grid v systemakh monytorynha y dyahnostyrovanyia teploenerhetycheskykh obektov. Tekhnycheskaia dyahnostyka y nerazrushaiushchyi kontrol. 2017. № 2. S. 33-41. http://doi.org/10.15407/tdnk2017.02.05
  78. Winkowska J., Szpilko D., Pejić S. Smart city concept in the light of the literature review. Engineering Management in Production and Services. 2019. Vol. 11 (2). P. 70- 86. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2019-0012
  79. Eremia M., Toma L., Sanduleac M. The smart city concept in the 21st century. Procedia Engineering. 2017. Vol. 181. P. 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.357
  80. Duan W., Nasiri R., Karamizadeh S. Smart City Concepts and Dimensions. In Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Information Technology: IoT and Smart City. 2019. P. 488-492. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377170.3377189
  81. Babak V.P., Zaporozhets A.O., Sverdlova A.D. Tekhnolohiia Smart Grid v systemakh monitorynhu obiektiv teploenerhetyky. Promyslova teplotekhnika. 2016. № 6 (38). S. 71-81. https://doi.org/10.31472/ihe.6.2016.10
  82. Sverdlova A.D., Zaporozhets A.O. Diahnostuvannia skladnykh teploenerhetychnykh obiektiv iz vykorystanniam neironnykh merezh. Materialy XII Mizhnarodnoi on-lain-konferentsii «Problemy teplofizyky ta teploenerhetyky». 26-27 zhovtnia 2021 r. 2021. Kyiv: Instytut tekhnichnoi teplofizyky NAN Ukrainy. S. 115.
  83. Zaporozhets A.O., Sverdlova A.D. (Rozroblennia iierarkhichnoi systemy diahnostuvannia teploenerhetychnoho obladnannia. Materialy 8-yi Natsionalnoi naukovo-tekhnichnoi konferentsii UkrNDT-2016, 22-24 lystopada 2016 r. Kyiv, 2016. S. 152-157. https://bit.ly/3AhLgVz
  84. Babak V.P., Babak S.V., Myslovych M.V., Zaporozhets A.O., Zvaritch V.M. Diagnostic Systems For Energy Equipments. Springer International Publishing. 2020. 133 р. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44443-3
  85. Babak V.P., Babak S.V., Eremenko V.S., Kuts Yu. V., Myslovych M.V., Scherbak L.M. et al. Models and Measures in Measurements and Monitoring. Springer International Publishing. 2021. 266 р. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70783-5
  86. Eremenko V., Zaporozhets A., Isaenko V., Babikova K. Application of Wavelet Trans- form for Determining Diagnostic Signs. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2019. Vol. 2387. P. 202-214. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2387/20190202.pdf
  87. Babak V.P., Zaporozhets A.O., Kuts Yu.V., Shcherbak L.M. Modeli i miry v teorii ta praktytsi vymiriuvan. Teplofizyka ta teploenerhetyka. 2020. Vol. 42 (4). P. 5-18. https://doi.org/10.31472/ttpe.4.2020.1
  88. Babak V., Scherbak L., Kuts Y., Zaporozhets A. Information and measurement technologies for solving problems of energy informatics. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2021. Vol. 3039. P. 24-31. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3039/short20.pdf.
  1. Huang B., Bai X., Zhou Z., Cui Q., Zhu D., Hu R. Energy informatics: Fundamentals and standardization. ICT Express. 2017. Vol. 3 (2). P. 76-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2017.05.006
  2. Califf C., Lin X., Sarker S. Understanding Energy Informatics: A Gestalt-Fit Perspective. AMCIS 2012 Proceedings. 2012. P. 13. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/GreenIS/13
  3. Watson R.T., Howells J., Boudreau M.C. Energy Informatics: Initial thoughts on data and process management. In Green business process management. 2012. P. 147-159. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27488-6_9
  4. Sposib vyznachennia vzaiemnoi koreliatsiinoi funktsii shumovykh syhnaliv: pat. 117967 Ukraina, MPK G01R 31/01, G06F 17/18 / Babak, V.P., Zaporozhets, A.O., Martyniuk, H.V., Shcherbak, L.M.; zaiavnyk ta patentovlasnyk Instytut tekhnichnoi teplofizyky NAN Ukrainy; zaiavl. 14.12.2016; opubl. 25.10.2018. Biul. № 20. 5 s.
  5. Zaporozhets A. Correlation Analysis Between the Components of Energy Balance and Pollutant Emissions. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2021. Vol. 232 (3). P. 114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05048-9
  6. Zaporozhets A.O. Statystychnyi analiz vplyvu enerhetychnoho sektoru Ukrainy na zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria. Zbirnyk tez XXXIX naukovo-tekhnichnoi konferentsii molodykh vchenykh ta spetsialistiv Instytutu problem modeliuvannia v enerhetytsi im. H.Ye. Pukhova NAN Ukrainy, 12 travnia 2021 r. Kyiv: IPME im. H.Ye. Pukhova NAN Ukrainy, 2021. S. 98-100.
  7. Zaporozhets A.O. Dyspersiinyi analiz v zadachakh monitorynhu zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria. Zbirnyk tez XL naukovo-tekhnichnoi konferentsii molodykh vchenykh ta spetsialistiv Instytutu problem modeliuvannia v enerhetytsi im. H.Ye. Pukhova NAN Ukrainy, 11 travnia 2022 r. Kyiv: IPME im. H.Ye. Pukhova NAN Ukrainy, 2022. S.107-109.
  8. Babak S., Babak V., Zaporozhets A., Sverdlova A. Method of Statistical Spline Functions for Solving Problems of Data Approximation and Prediction of Objects State. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2019. Vol. 2353. P. 810-821. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2353/paper64.pdf https://doi.org/10.32782/cmis/2353-64
  9. Zaporozhets, A.O., Redko O.O., Babak V.P., Eremenko V.S., Mokiychuk V.M. Method of indirect measurement of oxygen concentration in the air. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2018. Vol. 5. P. 105-114. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2018-5/14
  10. Zaporozhets A.O. Analiz zasobiv monitorynhu zabrudnennia povitria navkolyshnoho seredovyshcha. Naukoiemni tekhnolohii. 2017. № 3 (35). S. 242-252. https://doi.org/10.18372/2310-5461.35.11846
  11. Zaporozhets A.O. Control of Fuel Combustion in Boilers. Springer International Publishing. 2020. 123 р. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46299-4
  12. Yatsyshyn A., Zaporozhets A., Kovalenko V. Matematychni zasoby otsinky rivnia zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria vid pylinnia zoloshlakovidvaliv obiektiv teploenerhetyky. Materialy IX Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi Internet- konferentsii «Hlobalni ta rehionalni problemy informatyzatsii v suspilstvi i pryrodokorystuvanni 2021», 13-14 travnia 2021. Kyiv: NUBiP Ukrainy, 2021. S. 181-184.
  13. Zaporozhets A.O., Martyniuk I.D., Kutsenko V.O., Kovalenko O.M. Matematychni zasoby dlia otsiniuvannia vplyvu zolovidvaliv na grunty ta pidzemni vody. Materialy Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi Internet-konferentsii «Avtomatyzatsiia ta kompiuterno-intehrovani tekhnolohii u vyrobnytstvi ta osviti: stan, dosiahnennia, perspektyvy rozvytku», 11-21 bereznia 2021 r. Cherkasy: Cherkaskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Bohdana Khmelnytskoho, 2021. S. 93-97.
  14. Carta J.A., Ramirez P., Bueno C. A joint probability density function of wind speed and direction for wind energy analysis. Energy Conversion and Management. 2008. Vol. 49 (6). P. 1309-1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.01.010
  15. Zaporozhets A., Khaidurov V. Mathematical Models of Inverse Problems for Finding the Main Characteristics of Air Pollution Sources. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2020. Vol. 231 (12). P. 563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04933-z
  16. Zaporozhets A., Khaidurov V., Tsiupii T. Optimization Models of Industrial Furnaces and Methods for Obtaining Their Numerical Solution. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2021. Vol. 346. P. 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69189-9_7
  17. Zaporozhets A., Khaidurov V., Tsiupii T. Creation of High-Speed Methods for Solving Mathematical Models of Inverse Problems of Heat Power Engineering. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2022. Vol. 399. P. 41-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87675-3_3
  18. Zaporozhets A.O. Systema monitorynhu zabrudnennia povitria dlia kontroliu funktsionuvannia obiektiv enerhetyky. Zbirnyk dopovidei 9-yi Natsionalnoi naukovo-tekhnichnoi konferentsii «Neruinivnyi kontrol ta tekhnichna diahnostyka – UkrNDT-2019». Kyiv: UT NKTD, 2019. C. 107-112.
  19. Sverdlova A.D., Zaporozhets A.O., Bohachev I.V., Popov O.O., Iatsyshyn A.V., Iatsyshyn A.V. et al. Self-organizing network topology for autonomous IoT systems. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2021. Vol. 2850. P. 57-70. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2850/paper4.pdf
  20. Zaporozhets A.O., Sverdlova A.D. Rozroblennia vymiriuvalnykh moduliv iierarkhichnoi systemy diahnostuvannia enerhetychnoho obladnannia na bazi Smart Grid tekhnolohii. Zbirnyk tez XXXVI naukovo-tekhnichnoi konferentsii molodykh vchenykh ta spetsialistiv Instytutu problem modeliuvannia v enerhetytsi im. H.Ye. Pukhova NAN Ukrainy (do 100-richchia Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy), 16 travnia 2018 r. Kyiv: IPME im. H.Ye. Pukhova NAN Ukrainy, 2018. S. 65-66.
  21. Zaporozhets A.O., Sverdlova A.D., Ivaschenko T.G., Kovach V.O., Artemchuk V.O. Electronic circuits of measuring modules of air pollution monitoring system based on low-cost sensors. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022. Vol. 1049. P. 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1049/1/012016
  22. Modulna sensorna platforma: pat.149325 Ukraina, MPK G01N 27/00, G01N 27/10, G08B 25/00, F01B 25/04. / Zaporozhets, A.O., Babak, V.P., Sverdlova, A.D.; zaiavnyk ta patentovlasnyk Instytut tekhnichnoi teplofizyky NAN Ukrainy; zaiavl. 16.10.2018, opubl. 10.11.2021. Biul. № 45. 4 s.
  23. Zaporozhets A.O., Eremenko V.S., Serhiienko R.V., Ivanov S.A. Development of an intelligent system for diagnosing the technical condition of the heat power equipment. 2018 IEEE 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), 11-14 September 2018. Lviv: «Vezha i Ko», 2018. P. 48-51. http://doi.org/10.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.8526742
  24. Zaporozhets A., Eremenko V., Serhiienko R., Ivanov S. Methods and Hardware for Diagnosing Thermal Power Equipment Based on Smart Grid Technology. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2019. Vol. 871. P. 476-489. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01069-0_34
  25. Zaporozhets A.O., Sverdlova A.D., Artemchuk V.O., Kovach V.O., Kutsenko V.O. Vymiriuvalni moduli systemy monitorynhu zabrudnennia atmosfernoho povitria na bazi low-cost sensoriv. Zbirnyk tez XL naukovo-tekhnichnoi konferentsii molodykh vchenykh ta spetsialistiv Instytutu problem modeliuvannia v enerhetytsi im. H.Ye. Pukhova NAN Ukrainy, 11 travnia 2022 r. Kyiv: IPME im. H.Ye. Pukhova NAN Ukrainy, 2022. S. 112.
  26. Babak V.P., Zaporozhets A.O., Sverdlova A.D. Monitorynh zabrudnennia povitria na bazi rozpodilenykh multysensornykh merezh. Tezy III Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Mekhatronni systemy: innovatsii ta inzhynirynh», 10 zhovtnia 2019 r. Kyiv: KNUTD, 2019. S. 13-14.
  27. Zaporozhets A., Babak V., Sverdlova A., Isaienko V., Babikova K. Development of a System for Diagnosing Heat Power Equipment Based on IEEE 802.11s. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2021. Vol. 346. P. 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69189-9_8
  28. Zaporozhets A., Popov O., Artemchuk O., Kovach V., Kutsenko V. Air pollution monitoring system from energy objects based on mesh network. 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters, 24-27 May 2022. Kryvyi Rih: Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, 2022. P. 35.
  29. Gryb O., Karpaliuk I., Shvets S., Zaporozhets A. Recognition of corona discharge presence by acoustic system installed on unmanned aerial vehicle. Advances in Aerospace Technology. 2020. Vol. 85 (4). P. 46-52. https://doi.org/10.18372/2306-1472.85.15138
  30. Rezinkina M.M., Sokol Y.I., Zaporozhets A.O., Gryb O.G., Karpaliuk I.T., Shvets S.V. Monitoring of energy objects parameters with using UAVs. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2021. Vol. 359. P. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69752-5_1
  31. Rezinkina M., Rezinkin O., Zaporozhets A. UAVs Application in Power Engineering. 2021 IEEE 6th International Conference on Actual Problems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Development (APUAVD), 19-21 October 2021. Kyiv: IEEE, 2021. P. 161-164. https://doi.org/10.1109/APUAVD53804.2021.9615423
  32. Babak V., Zaporozhets A., Kovtun S., Serhiienko R. Methods and means of heat losses monitoring for heat pipelines. International Journal “NDT Days”. 2018. Vol. 2 (1). P. 213-221.
  33. Zaporozhets A.O. Dystantsiine diahnostuvannia tekhnichnoho stanu teplomerezh na bazi kvadrokopteriv. Tezy KhI Mizhnarodnoi konferentsii «Problemy teplofizyky ta teploenerhetyky», 21-22 travnia 2019 r. Kyiv: Instytut tekhnichnoi teplofizyky NAN Ukrainy, 2019.
  34. Zaporozhets A. System for Diagnosing Main Pipelines of Heat Networks Based on UAVs. International Journal “NDT Days”. 2019. Vol. 1 (2). P. 69-77.
  35. Sposib diahnostuvannia tekhnichnoho stanu mahistralnykh truboprovodiv teplovykh merezh: pat. 121084 Ukraina, MPK F17D 5/02, G01K 17/00 / Zaporozhets, A.O., Kovtun, C.I.; zaiavnyk ta patentovlasnyk Instytut tekhnichnoi teplofizyky NAN Ukrainy; zaiavl. 15.11.2018; opubl. 25.03.2020. Biul. № 6. 4 s.
  36. Yilmaz E., Hu J. CFD study of quadcopter aerodynamics at static thrust conditions. In Proceedings of the ASEE Northeast 2018 Annual Conference, West Hartford, CT, USA. 2018. P. 27-28.
  37. Yoon S., Diaz P. V., Boyd Jr D. D., Chan W. M., Theodore C. R. Computational aerodynamic modeling of small quadcopter vehicles. In American Helicopter Society (AHS) 73rd Annual Forum Fort Worth, Texas. 2017. Р. 371-386.
  38. Céspedes J. F., Lopez O. D. Simulation and validation of the aerodynamic performance of a quadcopter in hover condition using overset mesh. AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum. 2019. Р. 2824. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-2824
  39. Zaporozhets A. Overview of Quadrocopters for Energy and Ecological Monitoring. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2020. Vol. 298. P. 15-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48583-2_2
  40. Zaporozhets A.O. Bezpilotni litalni aparaty dlia system monitorynhu v enerhetytsi ta ekolohii. Zbirnyk tez XXXVIII naukovo-tekhnichnoi konferentsii molodykh vchenykh ta spetsialistiv Instytutu problem modeliuvannia v enerhetytsi im. H.Ye. Pukhova NAN Ukrainy, 15 travnia 2020 r. Kyiv: IPME im. H.Ye. Pukhova NAN Ukrainy, 2020. S. 40-42.
  41. Babak V.P., Zaporozhets A.O., Nazarenko O.O., Redko O.O. Analiz aproksymatsii rezultativ vymiriuvan teplovoho potoku bombovoho kalorymetra v nestatsionarnomu rezhymi. ScienceRise. 2017. № 37(8). S. 24-32. https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-416.2017.108935

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Post

Books Scientific monographs Ukrainian scientific book in a foreign language

Economic inequality through the lens of finance in Ukraine

Books Scientific monographs

Shevchenko and World Literature

Books Scientific monographs

Fundamentals of Evaluation and Diagnostics of Welded Structures